Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 04 Jun 2008 (Wednesday) 12:04
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Help buying MF camera

 
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Jun 07, 2008 11:03 |  #16

I'm staying away from hassy, having never tried it for any significant time.

The system is much too complex to my liking. There's a possibility of shutter failure, back leaks, backs breaking, body breaking and everything in between. I was buying some filters off a wedding photographer and he described blads as a very expensive system with high maintenance costs.

So I'm currently shooting with a yashica TLR with a red window on the back. It's slower to rewind, but it won't break.

If I do more shooting, I'll get a rollei of some sort with the same zeiss planar and shoot with that.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DrPablo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,568 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Jun 07, 2008 13:13 |  #17

I love the Hassy, no doubt about it. But if you were to get a different medium format SLR system that is handholdable, no doubt the Rollei would be right up with it. Rollei uses both Schneider and Zeiss glass, and being mostly a large format guy myself I happen to think that Schneider's lenses are second to none.

Notwithstanding your fears about Hasselblad, there IS a reason why it's been so popular and esteemed through all these years, and that is in large part because of the outstanding quality and reliability of the parts. And the good news is that it's very easy to get Hasselblads serviced, even old ones. There's a guy outside of Boston named David Odess who is extremely nice and takes orders from around the country to service (and clean / refurbish) Hasselblads. He does basically everything except the optics and electronics (of the newer systems). I've dealt with him once when I screwed up my shutter locking mechanism on the very day I bought my camera, and he guided me through the fix over the phone.


Canon 5D Mark IV, 24-105L II, 17 TS-E f/4L, MPE 65, Sigma 50 f/1.4, Sigma 85 f/1.4, 100 f/2.8L, 135 f/2L, 70-200 f/4L, 400 L
Film gear: Agfa 8x10, Cambo 4x5, Noblex 150, Hasselblad 500 C/M

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
breal101
Goldmember
2,724 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Aug 2006
     
Jun 07, 2008 13:47 |  #18

Paul, you got one sweet deal on your Hasselblad system. I have all Schneider lenses for LF and I love them but there are some very expensive alternatives that will blow your mind. To the other "doc" I used mine heavily for more than 25 years of pro shooting. I did have the lenses cleaned and reset to spec every two years, same for the backs and every three years for the bodies. In the whole time I used them I had one mainspring break in a body, one shutter leaf break in a lens, and 3 or 4 backs that I sent back for overlapping frames. All except parts were covered by the repairman's guarantee. Some of my friends with other cameras replaced their entire system 4 or 5 times in that time span. I think I got the better deal. Rollei is a great camera but it doesn't compare to Blad except IQ wise.


"Try to go out empty and let your images fill you up." Jay Maisel

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,970 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13442
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Jun 07, 2008 13:57 |  #19

DocFrankenstein wrote in post #5678460 (external link)
I'm staying away from hassy, having never tried it for any significant time.

The system is much too complex to my liking. There's a possibility of shutter failure, back leaks, backs breaking, body breaking and everything in between. I was buying some filters off a wedding photographer and he described blads as a very expensive system with high maintenance costs.

So I'm currently shooting with a yashica TLR with a red window on the back. It's slower to rewind, but it won't break.

If I do more shooting, I'll get a rollei of some sort with the same zeiss planar and shoot with that.

You'll never break a hassey 500 series body. They're machined out of one piece of metal. I've owned and shot allot with all the major medium format cameras and Blads are by far the most reliable and they have the BEST GLASS

The system 500C 500 C/M couldn't be any more simple really. All manual. Shutters in the lens so you can sync at any speed. Nothin complicated bout that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,970 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13442
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Jun 07, 2008 13:59 |  #20

DrPablo wrote in post #5678915 (external link)
I love the Hassy, no doubt about it. But if you were to get a different medium format SLR system that is handholdable, no doubt the Rollei would be right up with it. Rollei uses both Schneider and Zeiss glass, and being mostly a large format guy myself I happen to think that Schneider's lenses are second to none.

Notwithstanding your fears about Hasselblad, there IS a reason why it's been so popular and esteemed through all these years, and that is in large part because of the outstanding quality and reliability of the parts. And the good news is that it's very easy to get Hasselblads serviced, even old ones. There's a guy outside of Boston named David Odess who is extremely nice and takes orders from around the country to service (and clean / refurbish) Hasselblads. He does basically everything except the optics and electronics (of the newer systems). I've dealt with him once when I screwed up my shutter locking mechanism on the very day I bought my camera, and he guided me through the fix over the phone.

Rollei's are outstanding. I've actually been thinking about picking one up.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ C
Goldmember
1,953 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Now: N 39°36' 8.2" W 104°53' 58"; prev N 43°4' 33" W 88°13' 23"; home N 34°7' 0" W 118°16' 18"
     
Jun 07, 2008 14:19 |  #21

airfrogusmc wrote in post #5679081 (external link)
Rollei's are outstanding. I've actually been thinking about picking one up.

Rolleiflex? Or Rolleicord? :)


Gear: Kodak Brownie and homemade pin-hole cameras. Burlap sack for a bag.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Jun 07, 2008 14:45 |  #22

Karl C wrote in post #5679143 (external link)
Rolleiflex? Or Rolleicord? :)

And then there are versions of each... it's a nightmare to pick one. :D


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Jun 07, 2008 14:46 |  #23

airfrogusmc wrote in post #5679076 (external link)
You'll never break a hassey 500 series body. They're machined out of one piece of metal. I've owned and shot allot with all the major medium format cameras and Blads are by far the most reliable and they have the BEST GLASS

The system 500C 500 C/M couldn't be any more simple really. All manual. Shutters in the lens so you can sync at any speed. Nothin complicated bout that.

I'll keep that in mind.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ C
Goldmember
1,953 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Now: N 39°36' 8.2" W 104°53' 58"; prev N 43°4' 33" W 88°13' 23"; home N 34°7' 0" W 118°16' 18"
     
Jun 07, 2008 15:23 |  #24

DocFrankenstein wrote in post #5679226 (external link)
And then there are versions of each... it's a nightmare to pick one. :D

Before selling it to KEH, I used my dad's Rolleicord (Vb, I think). Great little camera however, I think the speeds were off. Or maybe it was just me screwing up the Sunny 16 rule. :lol:

I suspect the Yashica 124-G and Rolleicords are about the same. From what I know, the Rolleiflex's are very good TLR's.


Gear: Kodak Brownie and homemade pin-hole cameras. Burlap sack for a bag.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,610 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Help buying MF camera
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2821 guests, 165 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.