I took this one last summer. I think it turned out OK. Hopefully, I will get some good ones this season too.
safehaven Senior Member 536 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Second star to the right More info | Jun 05, 2008 21:41 | #1 |
RadAL Cream of the Crop 9,633 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Spanish Fort, AL More info | Jun 06, 2008 01:31 | #2 slower shutter speed and youd have a very nice shot. Equipment: Canon PowerShot A650IS (semi retired) and Canon Powershot G10 (primary) and Rebel XT 350D w/18-55mm kit lens and Quanterey 18-200mm-- www.youtube.com/alexander1485
LOG IN TO REPLY |
safehaven THREAD STARTER Senior Member 536 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Second star to the right More info | Jun 06, 2008 10:42 | #3 RadAL wrote in post #5670621 slower shutter speed and youd have a very nice shot. Thanks for the input. Honestly though, I do not feel auto X pictures should have panning blur to them. Auto x is really not about speed and much more about precision. Speeds rarely exceed what you might drive on the 2-lane back roads. Therefore, I personally do not think that it should be portrayed as a speed event. For instance, the car in this picture was probably only doing about 30 mph or less at that moment. I don't even know if panning at that speed would create blur. Maybe I will give a shot though and try the next time I am out there.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
justincase724 Goldmember 1,400 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2006 Location: San Diego, CA More info | It's not always about portraying speed, but at least portraying a sense of motion. Yeah, it looks good and sharp, but it also looks like it's parked in a parking lot with a few cones set up around it. Either way, if it's what you like best, no one can fault an opinion. It's a decent shot regardless.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JamieHolladay Cream of the Crop 21,557 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Gadsden, Alabama, USA More info | Jun 06, 2008 13:14 | #5 justincase724 wrote in post #5673004 It's not always about portraying speed, but at least portraying a sense of motion. I agree, a sense of motion would add to this photo. The Site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
safehaven THREAD STARTER Senior Member 536 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Second star to the right More info | Thanks for the input all. I will give that a try the next time I'm out.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
afviper Member 179 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2006 Location: Ellensburg, WA More info | Jun 07, 2008 11:07 | #8 Shots with a fast shutter speed work if there is something more to the photo than a car taking a corner. If you get a car picking up a wheel, or bouncing over curbs freezing motion would work, but most of the time conveying motion is better. 30D, 300D, Tokina 12-24mm, Tamron 28-75mm f2.8, 50mm f1.8, 100mm F2.0, Sigma 70-300mm APO macro, Tokina 400mm F5.6, CZ Jenna 135mm f3.5, 18-55mm,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Ballast Senior Member 266 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: London, Ontario More info | Jun 10, 2008 20:50 | #9 I often have a hard time shooting autocross because it is so hard to convey motion in it while still showing what the sport is about.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2303 guests, 136 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||