Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 05 Jun 2008 (Thursday) 22:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Really Right Stuff: new Monopod Head!

 
b.d.bop
Goldmember
Avatar
1,084 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: north central Pennsylvania
     
Jun 05, 2008 22:18 |  #1

Really Right Stuff just released their new MH-01 High Capacity Monopod Head (external link) <----click

I'm betting this will be a big seller. :D


Dr. Mark Polis 1DsIII | 7D
the Gear Arsenal | flickr (external link) | PBase galleries (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gymell
Goldmember
Avatar
3,783 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 73
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Bloomington, MN
     
Jun 06, 2008 07:55 |  #2

Yes, I just got their catalog yesterday and saw it. Looks like the perfect thing for using my 500 f/4 on my monopod. I have their pro clamp already, so I will definitely be trying out this head.


-Liz
My online gallery (external link) and Live Streaming Feeder Cam (external link)
Help native birds - discourage house sparrows! (external link)
Minnesota Master Naturalist (external link) - "Explore, Teach, Conserve"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdizzle
Darth Noink
Avatar
69,419 posts
Likes: 65
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Harvesting Nano crystals
     
Jun 06, 2008 08:54 |  #3

I saw that too. I will be purchasing one myself. =)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Double ­ Negative
*sniffles*
Avatar
10,533 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New York, USA
     
Jun 06, 2008 09:49 |  #4

That is sweet.


La Vida Leica! (external link) LitPixel Galleries (external link) -- 1V-HS, 1D Mark IIn & 5D Mark IV w/BG-E20
15mm f/2.8, 14mm f/2.8L, 24mm f/1.4L II, 35mm f/1.4L, 50mm f/1.2L, 85mm f/1.2L II, 135mm f/2.0L
16-35mm f/2.8L, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, Extender EF 1.4x II & 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jun 06, 2008 13:13 |  #5

Sure looks nice. It's also expensive... Then again, not as ridiculously priced as the one by Acratech (external link) :p


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sneakerpimp
Senior Member
Avatar
665 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2008
Location: The O.C.
     
Jun 06, 2008 20:23 as a reply to  @ René Damkot's post |  #6

yes, quite pricey for what it is, so i'll have to choose a more economical solution.


Canon EOS M | G7 X | S90

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LBaldwin
Goldmember
Avatar
4,490 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2006
Location: San Jose,CA
     
Jun 07, 2008 01:01 |  #7

sneakerpimp wrote in post #5675566 (external link)
yes, quite pricey for what it is, so i'll have to choose a more economical solution.

I don't thinks so. The Wimberley is much more expensive and that is what I had planned on getting to solve this issue!

I would like to play with one on my 400 2.8 first just to get a feel for it, but it looks like the right answer.


Les Baldwin
http://www.fotosfx.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chris1911
Member
Avatar
104 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Georgia, USA
     
Jun 07, 2008 22:17 |  #8

René Damkot wrote in post #5673267 (external link)
Sure looks nice. It's also expensive... Then again, not as ridiculously priced as the one by Acratech (external link) :p

How about this (external link)

Or this (external link):shock:


40D w/BG-E2N | EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS | EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS | EF 50mm f/1.8 | Metz 48 AF-1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jannie
Goldmember
4,936 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Jun 07, 2008 23:01 |  #9

That Acratech one looks cool, looks huge, the link above to the RRS one is only the base, you put their special plate adaptor on top, it comes with the thumbscrew or quick release and yes for even more money. http://reallyrightstuf​f.com …sMono&iTpStatus​=0&Tp=&Bc= (external link)


Ms.Jannie
"When you come to a fork in the road, take it"!
1DMKIII, 85LII, 24-70L, 100-400L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LBaldwin
Goldmember
Avatar
4,490 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2006
Location: San Jose,CA
     
Jun 08, 2008 00:16 |  #10

I looked at many of the ball heads and I just don;t like them. I want a device that locks exactly where I put it - no fade- and allows for controlled pan and tilt.


Les Baldwin
http://www.fotosfx.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jannie
Goldmember
4,936 posts
Joined Jan 2008
     
Jun 08, 2008 00:32 |  #11

My brother switched from the Acratech (which I now have) and got the largest RRS on a think a Gitzo 3550 and says it locks solid. I don't know about the vairable tension but I do that with my Acratech sometimes, what you are asking for is a fluid head and they can be iffy, I worked with them shooting motion over the years and always found the best ones were always the heaviest ones made on the heaviest tripods made. Of course the cameras were super heavy too. Even on a camera dolly I'd have the key grip make sure it was tight cause when you make the slightest change back from right to left or whatever, if it isn't tight there will be a little bump in your camera move and it'll be hell when your sitting there the next day viewing the footage.

Granted it may not be quite as critical but I know what you mean, it's one of the first things I noticed when I got reunited with still equipment last year and that is I wanted to move with the subject while on the tripod and shoot as I go just like when hand held.

You could do it but if you've ever complained about setting up a still tripod and the moments that takes get ready to slow down, you gotta plant the legs firmly, my assistant when outside would always step on each foot which has a sidebar to the spike and make sure they were embedden in the ground, maybe putting a sandbag on the foot of each leg...I could go on, stills seem like such a treat equipment wise, and the ability to use flash/strobes or extended exposures, OMGosh it's wonderful, I had so much fun today messing around with some table top shooting using window light, I felt like Rembrant back in the good old days and it was thrilling. Okay, I do go on don't I...


Ms.Jannie
"When you come to a fork in the road, take it"!
1DMKIII, 85LII, 24-70L, 100-400L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,331 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2522
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
     
Jun 08, 2008 00:59 as a reply to  @ Jannie's post |  #12

I don't use a ball head with a monopod...

I have in the past tried ball heads on a monopod and I gave up that idea.

I like a ball head for my tripod IF I am not following action.

I use the Kirk MPA-1 (which is basically a Manfrotto monopod head with a Kirk Arca Compatible Q.R.) for a lot of my stuff on a monopod. It is light and handy and does what I want to do with it. I like the Arca Com[patible quick release because I believe that there is no better way to mount a camera to a tripod than the Really Right Stuff L-Plate.

However, if I specifically know that I will be following action such as following a hydroplane; I will use the Manfrotto 3421 long lens support. I use this support with my 400mm f/5.6L lens on a Manfrotto 681 monopod or a Giottos MT-8180 tripod. The 3421 works well on both the tripod and on the monopod.

http://www.nikonians.o​rg …/manfrotto_393/​393_1.html (external link)


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dbdors
Goldmember
Avatar
1,002 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Houston, Texas USA
     
Jun 08, 2008 01:09 |  #13

Yes, very expensive, $150 plus you still need a clamp!! I prefer the Kirk MPA-1. Or put together your own kit, you can get the Manfrotto/Bogen swivel used on Ebay and even a used clamp. But $91 ain't all that bad.


Darrell
My SmugMug Nature/Landscape Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,143 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Really Right Stuff: new Monopod Head!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2867 guests, 184 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.