Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 06 Jun 2008 (Friday) 03:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

ir assist with flash off ?

 
road ­ warrior
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Jun 06, 2008 03:16 |  #1

I photograph live bands, its always dark of course, whilst available light is always a problem, my main problem is focusing, is there a way of using the ir assist on the 430ex without setting off the flash. I dont want to use flash as it washes out the stage colours. Another problem is that ir assist is only available on full auto mode, and on the various idiot modes on my 400d and 300d, and as it is full auto, it takes away my asa1600 because it sets off the flash and therefore doesnt need asa1600. double jepardy. I know canon makes a very expensive ir assist for wireless flash, but there mush be a cheaper way..
i hope that all makes sense. basically i need ir without flash going off.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lotto
Goldmember
Avatar
2,750 posts
Likes: 192
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Southern California
     
Jun 06, 2008 03:27 |  #2

Don't think the XT bodies has a custom function to turn off the flash. You can alway put the 430 to manual mode and lowest power, and turn the flash head straight up or backward.


5D, 24-105L, 70-200L IS, 85mm Art, Godox

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
road ­ warrior
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Jun 06, 2008 10:03 |  #3

Lotto wrote in post #5670905 (external link)
Don't think the XT bodies has a custom function to turn off the flash. You can alway put the 430 to manual mode and lowest power, and turn the flash head straight up or backward.

yes they have, but that is not my problem. tried all that, any activity of the flash automatically sets the exposure for flash, and remember i am standing with people around me, the flash in their faces will antaganise them.
i want the flash function on, i just dont want the gun to actually flash, i just want a better autofocus, and so i only want the ir assist, not the flash.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Jun 06, 2008 10:23 |  #4

Have you checked custom function 5 on the camera?


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nadtz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,483 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jun 06, 2008 10:41 |  #5

IR assist shouldn't be available in the auto modes only. Ive done exactly what Lotto mentioned in manual modes on both camera and flash with my metz.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jun 06, 2008 12:16 |  #6

road warrior wrote in post #5672209 (external link)
yes they have, but that is not my problem. tried all that, any activity of the flash automatically sets the exposure for flash, and remember i am standing with people around me, the flash in their faces will antaganise them.
i want the flash function on, i just dont want the gun to actually flash, i just want a better autofocus, and so i only want the ir assist, not the flash.

Unfortunately, with the 400D and the 300D, there is no option to disable the firing of the flash like there is with the xxD cameras (even the 1D series cameras didn't have it until the Mark III came along). And the disabling of the flash is one function that can't be set via the flash either, like it can be for the enabling/disabling of the IR assist beam.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DeCeccoNET
Senior Member
Avatar
757 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Eastchester, New York
     
Jun 06, 2008 12:25 |  #7

Have you tried setting the flash for manual mode at the lowest setting so your camera's exposure settings remain indipendant, and then using somthing like an omnibounce filter painted black (or stuffed with black paper)?

In my opinion this should alow you to indipendantly set the camera, and the flash which will fire regardless, but the light will be compleatly phyisically blocked, and the IR funtion should remain enabled for focusing....

The other more expensive option would be a ST-E2 transmitter, which I have used quite a bit to provide focus assist without need for a flash. I think they are going for around $220 these days. I also seem to recall the 580ex can easilly fit your bill as well if you set it as a master but assign it to a group that you will not be using when you actually take the picture. Focus asist will definitly be enabled in this situation.


Sold all my gear (again) to re-focus on enjoying time with my family
Most recently owned: EOS R5, RF 35 1.8 IS Macro, RF 50 1.8, RF 70-200 2.8 IS L, EF 50 1.8, EF 100 2.8 IS L Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nadtz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,483 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jun 06, 2008 13:00 |  #8

Well first he should figure out why the flash isn't working properly outside of the magic modes, that at least should be working. As for blinding people around you, cover the flash head, you don't need it for assist, just the red emitter on the front of the flash.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Xerox
Member
83 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Jun 06, 2008 13:08 |  #9

Manual focus. Problem solved. :)


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nadtz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,483 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jun 06, 2008 16:43 |  #10

AF is very useful when shooting shows and the like, with the lights and movement it can be hard to tell if youhave it right in manual (specially with my bad eyes).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Jun 06, 2008 17:13 |  #11

I would think it shouldn't be necessary to disable one function (and a useful one) to enable another.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
road ­ warrior
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Jun 13, 2008 02:42 as a reply to  @ Titus213's post |  #12

thank you fellas for your replies, I am somewhat confused as, for no reason at all, the ir has started to work on all modes, which is worrying as it would indicate either something is wrong, or was wrong.
can anybody say for sure, (either way) whether it should - or should not work in all modes on my 400d, or indeed if the problem lies in the 430ex, or even the off camera cable which I use permanantly. Ok I can eliminate the cable by putting it on shoe, but any ideas would be helpful.
Anyway, for now, I have discovered a work-around, use flat batteries.... the ir works fine as it doesnt need much power, but the flash has to recycle and so i can get 10 shots in before it powers back up.
The flaw in the "cover the head up" system, is that when the camera senses the flash is powered on, it makes the exposure based on that, so when no light is emitted the photo is underexposed big time, but when the batteries are tired, the flash gun doesnt flag the camera and say "i am ready" and so the correct exposure is made by the camera, so ir but no flash..result.. (sort of)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jrsforums
Goldmember
1,249 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Cary (Raleigh), NC, USA
     
Jun 13, 2008 03:34 |  #13

road warrior wrote in post #5713815 (external link)
thank you fellas for your replies, I am somewhat confused as, for no reason at all, the ir has started to work on all modes, which is worrying as it would indicate either something is wrong, or was wrong.
can anybody say for sure, (either way) whether it should - or should not work in all modes on my 400d, or indeed if the problem lies in the 430ex, or even the off camera cable which I use permanantly. Ok I can eliminate the cable by putting it on shoe, but any ideas would be helpful.
Anyway, for now, I have discovered a work-around, use flat batteries.... the ir works fine as it doesnt need much power, but the flash has to recycle and so i can get 10 shots in before it powers back up.
The flaw in the "cover the head up" system, is that when the camera senses the flash is powered on, it makes the exposure based on that, so when no light is emitted the photo is underexposed big time, but when the batteries are tired, the flash gun doesnt flag the camera and say "i am ready" and so the correct exposure is made by the camera, so ir but no flash..result.. (sort of)

I believe that the AF assist is only emitted when needed. I am not sure if it is only below a certain EC level or if the camera "requests" it when AF cannot also be achieved due to low contrast.


John

Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S-Man
Goldmember
2,008 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2007
     
Jun 17, 2008 16:25 as a reply to  @ jrsforums's post |  #14

I was having the same problem when I was shooting a wedding last week.
I was using a 70-200 IS and was having major problems autofocusing. I was shooting in manual mode, and was using bounce-flash. I was getting very upset that the AF Assist beam was not firing on my 430. It would have helped immensely and I would not have missed some shots.
Why does the AF assist beam not fire when in manual mode? I really need to use it!
Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jun 17, 2008 16:42 |  #15

S-Man wrote in post #5740070 (external link)
I was having the same problem when I was shooting a wedding last week.
I was using a 70-200 IS and was having major problems autofocusing. I was shooting in manual mode, and was using bounce-flash. I was getting very upset that the AF Assist beam was not firing on my 430. It would have helped immensely and I would not have missed some shots.
Why does the AF assist beam not fire when in manual mode? I really need to use it!
Thanks

The purpose of the AF assist beam is to help the camera in auto focusing in dim lighting. When you switch the lens to manual focus mode, the camera no longer has to auto focus the lens so it doesn't need to have the AF assist beam emitted from the flash. That's how it was designed.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,979 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
ir assist with flash off ?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2768 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.