Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Thread started 06 Jun 2008 (Friday) 06:28
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Canon EF 20-35mm f/2.8L

 
Proctorr
Member
185 posts
Joined Nov 2006
     
Jun 06, 2008 06:28 |  #1

I haven't seen one in the sticky of the lens archives, so will this be the start of it? :)

I have one waiting for me to use, but I haven't used it yet. The Canon rep said it was a true hidden gem.


1D Mark II | 70-200mm F2.8L | 17-40mm F4.0L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
SeattleSpeedster
Goldmember
Avatar
2,881 posts
Gallery: 296 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 2414
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
     
Jun 06, 2008 09:22 |  #2

yeah i would love to see some examples...


Fuji GFX50s and A7R II | Zeiss 85mm f1.4 Otus | Zeiss 28mm f1.4 Otus | Zeiss 55mm f1.8 | Canon 200mm f1.8 | Zeiss 100-300mm | Zeiss 16-35mm f4 | Zeiss 135mm f2 | Voigtlander 10mm f5.6 | Zeiss 50mm f1.4 http://www.mikereidpho​tography.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photobitz
PlatinumMeasure​baiter
Avatar
6,499 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Wollongong, NSW, Australia
     
Jun 06, 2008 09:51 |  #3

It was supposed to be pretty good except it uses the old style AFD autofocus motor so noisy, slow and no FTM :(


Dan

My gear | Me on Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jacobsen1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,629 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Mt View, RI
     
Jun 23, 2009 12:10 as a reply to  @ photobitz's post |  #4

I had this lens for a few months while contemplating a 2.8 UWA zoom. Basically it was cheap enough I could keep it AND the 17-40 -vs- a 16-35I. It's a great lens, rock solid and nice and compact (but not light). I loved it, but ultimately I needed both wide (for lanscapes) and fast (for inside baby shots) so I had to upgrade. but if 20mm is wide enough for you and the AF noise doesn't bug you it's one hell of a lens....

IMAGE: http://gear.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/canon-20-35/img_2466.jpg

IMAGE: http://gear.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/canon-20-35/img_2468.jpg

and a size comparison:
IMAGE: http://gear.benjacobsenphoto.com/wp-content/gallery/canon-20-35/img_2452.jpg

My Gear List

my sites:
benjacobsenphoto.com (external link) | newschoolofphotography​.com (external link)
GND buyers FAQ

FOR SALE: 5Dii RRS L-bracket, 430II, 12mm macro tube PM ME!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photobitz
PlatinumMeasure​baiter
Avatar
6,499 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Wollongong, NSW, Australia
     
Jun 23, 2009 23:27 |  #5

Great colours! Seems quite sharp too compared to the 17-35L that (kind of) replaced it.


Dan

My gear | Me on Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bazz8
Senior Member
Avatar
385 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 31
Joined Oct 2003
Location: South Australia,Pt.Willunga
     
Apr 25, 2010 04:43 |  #6

photobitz wrote in post #8163757 (external link)
Great colours! Seems quite sharp too compared to the 17-35L that (kind of) replaced it.

Old old thread but having only today tested the difference between my 20-35 2.8L and the new for me 17-40 f4.0 L while doing some hospital waiting, I was parked near a clmn anD decided to check the difference between the 2 lenses. the 20-35 is sharper colour etc not sure checK for yourself I was also shooting through a dirty windscreen s and both shots are available light on my 1DMK3 hand held.
1668 :20-35 f2.8L
1669: 17-40 f4L
My solution keep both paid $1200 for the 20-35 over 10 yrs ago and as a carry round lens it,s great


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Gear List : SLR BODIES: Eos 5, Eos 3, D30 ( GIFT TO SON INLAW) 40D( SOLD) 1DMK3 ( Current Body)
LENSES : 28-105 USM ( WENT WITH D30) 50MM1.8 , 20-35MM F 2.8 L , 17-40MM F 4.0 L , 90MM MACRO F 2.8 TAMRON 75-300 F4-5.6 USM , 200MM MK11 2.8 L , 400mm 5.6L
TRYPOD: MANFROTTO 190 WITH MEDIUM FORMAT 3WAY HEAD, MANFROTTO MONOPOD LARGE SIZE.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cinemafia
Member
Avatar
160 posts
Joined May 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
May 27, 2010 18:01 as a reply to  @ Bazz8's post |  #7

I've rented the 16-35L II for gigs several times and I love it, but like many, I couldn't afford to own it just yet. So, I bought the cheapest alternative, the 20-35L. I would say the color and sharpness are equal. Of course, with the 16-35L II you get 4mm wider view, USM, FTM, weather-sealing and a much closer MFD (that's the only thing that really bugs me!).

And, just to add to the thread, here's a couple random examples from very different settings (both were shot on my 1D MkII):

20mm, iso 160, f3.2:

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4052/4635380781_9ae9d1f0ed.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …a_photography/4​635380781/  (external link)

35mm, iso 500, f7.1:
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4066/4526376912_f5c1b133fe.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …a_photography/4​526376912/  (external link)

1D MkII / 20:2.8 / 24-105L / 50:1.4
portfolio (external link) / flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Morani
Hatchling
8 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Rome, Italy
     
Aug 01, 2010 18:02 |  #8

I bought this lens last week...
I think that this 20 years old lens is still quite good in terms of sharpness and overall IQ

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4126/4847965976_fdbe63128c_b.jpg

5d+ 20-35 @ 20mm, iso 400 f8
:D



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zacmac2112
Member
48 posts
Joined Jan 2010
     
Aug 16, 2010 22:25 |  #9

On Film (Rebel 2000 - provia 160 iso & drugstore negative scan)

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4138/4891346109_4e818cd94a_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/adammcdowell/4​891346109/  (external link)
Blacktail path by TheMcDowell's, on Flickr (external link)

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4139/4891941734_984ed99ae2_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/adammcdowell/4​891941734/  (external link)
Mammoth! by TheMcDowell's, on Flickr (external link)

And on a 30D
IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4094/4867178261_296c343a49_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/adammcdowell/4​867178261/  (external link)
another creek brownie by TheMcDowell's, on Flickr (external link)

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4098/4867801012_43aacd3568_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/adammcdowell/4​867801012/  (external link)
Paradise Valley Grill by TheMcDowell's, on Flickr (external link)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
niwooe
Senior Member
362 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2009
     
Aug 21, 2010 12:30 |  #10

got myself a deal on the ancient Canon EF20-35mm f2.8L today, pretty sharp albeit the old age!

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4115/4913070495_4a2140fdbd_z.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4117/4913668876_f74b7c3f66_z.jpg

I know I'm late haha :D

Canon 5D | 24L | 50L | 85L | 135L
My Flickr (external link)
My webpage (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
niwooe
Senior Member
362 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2009
     
Aug 28, 2010 10:49 |  #11

looks like I'll be the only one updating this thread ;)

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4136/4932888592_2e3a6d8d0e_z.jpg

Canon 5D | 24L | 50L | 85L | 135L
My Flickr (external link)
My webpage (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cinemafia
Member
Avatar
160 posts
Joined May 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Aug 31, 2010 15:36 as a reply to  @ niwooe's post |  #12

I ended up selling mine because I didn't like how long the MFD was, bought a 20mm f2.8 USM instead (which has half the MFD).


1D MkII / 20:2.8 / 24-105L / 50:1.4
portfolio (external link) / flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photobitz
PlatinumMeasure​baiter
Avatar
6,499 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Wollongong, NSW, Australia
     
Sep 06, 2010 00:22 |  #13

cinemafia wrote in post #10824654 (external link)
I ended up selling mine because I didn't like how long the MFD was, bought a 20mm f2.8 USM instead (which has half the MFD).

Yeah, the 20/2.8USM is so underrated. I don't think it has the great colour reproduction that the 20-35 seems to have though.


Dan

My gear | Me on Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cinemafia
Member
Avatar
160 posts
Joined May 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Sep 06, 2010 22:48 |  #14

photobitz wrote in post #10857227 (external link)
Yeah, the 20/2.8USM is so underrated. I don't think it has the great colour reproduction that the 20-35 seems to have though.

I dunno, so far I can't really tell the difference. Heck, even if I could, I'd still stick with the 20mm USM.


1D MkII / 20:2.8 / 24-105L / 50:1.4
portfolio (external link) / flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
niwooe
Senior Member
362 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2009
     
Sep 07, 2010 12:00 |  #15

the MFD of this lens may be long but it's one heck of a lens!

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4138/4934604251_05627779d9_z.jpg

Canon 5D | 24L | 50L | 85L | 135L
My Flickr (external link)
My webpage (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

62,483 views & 46 likes for this thread
Canon EF 20-35mm f/2.8L
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is nmbugs
712 guests, 332 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.