Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras 
Thread started 25 Dec 2004 (Saturday) 16:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Speedlite 220EX vs. Sunpak PZ40X

 
Superbaldguy
Senior Member
355 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: New Germany, N.S.
     
Dec 25, 2004 16:45 |  #1

I'd like to get an external flash for my G6, but the 420EX and 550EX are simply too big and cumbersome. The G6 is the ultimate available-light digicam (with its fast f/2~f/3 aperture) and I rarely have use for a flash, anyway, except for fill work at close distances. If I have anything really important to shoot with a bigger bounce flash, I'll use my EOS film system and 540 EZ.

So, I'd like a smaller, throw-in-the-bag unit for those times when I'd like something morso than the dinky built-in flash. I like the 220EX as it will work with the Off-Camera Shoe Cord (I have two of those!), meaning I can get it off the camera, but it can't bounce; the Sunpak PZ40X has bounce.

What would you suggest? These flashes are about the same in cost. I assume you can dial in the flash exposure compensation with the 220EX.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Superbaldguy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
355 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: New Germany, N.S.
     
Dec 27, 2004 16:14 |  #2

Another related issue is whether or not the Sunpak could be adjusted by the flash exposure compensation on the G6 (I doubt it). If not, I will stick with the Canon flash as this feature is invaluable for fill-in situations which is the main reason for having the smaller flash unit.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Superbaldguy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
355 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: New Germany, N.S.
     
Dec 30, 2004 03:09 as a reply to  @ Superbaldguy's post |  #3

Opinions are in short supply on the Sunpak, anywhere, so I decided to get the 220EX. I didn't need a super-powerful flash unit, just one that could supplant the built-in one and provide adequate fill-in coverage at close distances.

I already have the 540EZ for my EOS film camera system, where I certainly need a unit with more power and flexibility




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pradeep1
Goldmember
Avatar
2,365 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 42
Joined Sep 2003
Location: USA
     
Dec 30, 2004 07:57 as a reply to  @ Superbaldguy's post |  #4

Sorry SuperBaldGuy, I thought this was the same post as before where I could only offer you a meager opinion on battery and capacity.

I second your choice of using the 220EX for your stated purpose. I'd check the 540EZ out at this link if you have not already:

http://www.botzilla.co​m/photo/strobeVolts.ht​ml (external link)

But I don't think the 220EX will be able to use the G6's FEC, so that may be an issue for you. Check out this link:

http://eosdoc.com/manu​als/flash/ETTLDx/ (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Superbaldguy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
355 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: New Germany, N.S.
     
Dec 30, 2004 13:24 as a reply to  @ pradeep1's post |  #5

No problem.

Too bad the 540EZ couldn't work on a digital camera.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
figueira
Member
33 posts
Joined Nov 2004
     
Dec 31, 2004 06:36 |  #6

Superbaldguy wrote:
I like the 220EX as it will work with the Off-Camera Shoe Cord (I have two of those!), meaning I can get it off the camera, but it can't bounce; the Sunpak PZ40X has bounce.

Ok, it has no bounce... but you can bounce it if you are holding it off-camera with your hands or with a proper arm... and point it to the ceiling, walls, whatever....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Superbaldguy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
355 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: New Germany, N.S.
     
Dec 31, 2004 09:52 as a reply to  @ figueira's post |  #7

Yes, I could do that although its modest power would mean using higher ISO's.

The nice thing about the Canon Speedlites are the little touches - like auto power shutdown after 90 seconds and instant on if you touch the shutter release........




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,338 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Speedlite 220EX vs. Sunpak PZ40X
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2130 guests, 127 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.