Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 08 Jun 2008 (Sunday) 22:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Time to buy a flash..

 
ShotByTom
Goldmember
Avatar
3,050 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 136
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Indianapolis
     
Jun 08, 2008 22:39 |  #1

I was ready to buy two Sunpak 383's today, even had them in the shopping cart and pulled the walled out to enter the credit card info...then I started to think, and cancelled it..

I've searched and have found plenty of info on these flashes, but I'm wanting some feedback from people who have used the following flashes.

My choices are:

Buy 2 Sunpak 383's and use them with my Studio Strobe, and to take with me on locations, fired with cactus triggers.

OR..

Buy a Canon 430ex now, and save for a 580ex II later and get a STE-2 transmitter to fire them.

My question is...are the Canon's worth the extra $600 to $700?

I'm having a hard time justifying it...but then I went thru this with my lenses too, and now that I've spent a thousand dollars on a lens, I think it was well worth it..

The main reason I'm leaning toward the Canon flashes is because I like the idea of having a 580 to use on-camera rather than the Sunpak. Also, the Canon's have a lot more power than the other flashes that I've looked at (Sigma, Vivitar and Sunpak..).

Any suggestions or comments would be appreciated!


Gear
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 08, 2008 23:35 |  #2

The Canon wireless system is much much quicker to set up and use than a manual system. The downsides are they don't work well in bright light, and your master must have a direct line of sight to the slaves. It triggers most of the time inside, and if you have two flashes outside it will sometimes only trigger if the master is pointed at the slave with the flash head zoomed. If you have one light on each side of the camera you don't have much chance of getting them both slaves to fire on a bright day.

A manual system with a reliable slave system (skyports) will take longer to set up and use when you first start, but you'll get pretty quick with it with some practice. It'll work under just about any conditions.

A manual system with GI/Cactus triggers will misfire and frustrate you.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jadam
Senior Member
278 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Jun 09, 2008 01:05 |  #3

Pocket wizards. I have both PW and the STE-2. Once I got my PWs I never used the STE-2 again. The range on it isn't very good, and it requires a direct line of site from the flashes to the transmitter which become inconvenient at times.


http://www.JadamPhotog​raphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsaber
I have no idea what's going on
Avatar
3,536 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Jun 09, 2008 03:17 |  #4

Skyports are a cheaper alternative to the Pocket Wizards. Definitely worth looking into in my opinion.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Jun 09, 2008 03:46 |  #5

Sunpak 383s and Skyports. That is what I use, and pick it over my 580EX for off-camera use every time! One benefit of the Sunpaks is that they give me better coverage over the whole 43" Westcott umbrellas where the 580EX, even zoomed out to the 24mm position, won't cover the whole thing (the Sunpaks are supposed to cover 35mm, but it looks like they cover even wider than that!). I even prefer the manual controls on the Sunpaks over the multiple button presses on the 580EX. The only area where the 580EX is better is that it goes down to 1/128 of the power, where the Sunpak will only go down to 1/16. Not an issue most of the time, and the Sunpaks are better in all the other situations, IMO, so that is why I prefer them.


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ShotByTom
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,050 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 136
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Indianapolis
     
Jun 09, 2008 12:30 |  #6

Wow, great information! Thank you for the feedback!


Gear
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Jun 09, 2008 21:28 |  #7

Here is a link to my comments regarding light coverage differences between the Sunpak 383 and the Canon 580EX, using 43" umbrellas:

https://photography-on-the.net …hp?p=5689336&po​stcount=22


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Flying ­ Turtle
Member
59 posts
Joined Jul 2007
     
Jun 10, 2008 12:33 |  #8

Why are you planning on buying a 580exII and STE-2? Why not just another 430 and an STE-2?


40D, 17-55IS, 70-200 f4 IS, 430ex, 580exII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ShotByTom
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,050 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 136
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Indianapolis
     
Jun 10, 2008 21:47 |  #9

The Flying Turtle wrote in post #5696456 (external link)
Why are you planning on buying a 580exII and STE-2? Why not just another 430 and an STE-2?

Really just for the power. I have young kids and we go to 2 or 3 parties a month for them and in the summer the parties are outside and usually mid-day. So I want a flash that will be powerful enough to fill in the strong shadows caused by the mid-day sun. Good question though, maybe I don't really need to spend the extra $150 for the 580. I've never used either of these flashes, so I don't know how they perfrom. I've always thought the 430ex was about the same as my Sigma EF 500 DG Super, and I would like to have more power than that flash offered.


Gear
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 10, 2008 22:13 |  #10

The 580 is only about one stop more powerful than the 430. The only time I fire the 580 at full power is in summer when the background is in full sun and the subjects are in full shade.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,192 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Time to buy a flash..
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2775 guests, 162 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.