Taking pictures of scantily clad woman sounds like a nightmare to me, specially, if my wife hears about it.
Ovi
OviV Goldmember 1,129 posts Joined Oct 2003 Location: Miami, FL More info | Taking pictures of scantily clad woman sounds like a nightmare to me, specially, if my wife hears about it. 5D, 40D, Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 EX, Sigma 15MM Fisheye,17-40 L, 24-105 L, 50 1.8, Tamron 28-75 2.8, Sigma 70-200 2.8, 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS, 100-400 L, 300 F4 L, 580 ex, Sigma 500 Super DG Flash x 2, too much other stuff to list.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OneManArmy Member 212 posts Joined Dec 2004 More info | Permanent bancharles complimented my shots today - I'm on a high!! Sorry to hijack. (2) MkII's, 24-70L, 70-200L, 300 2.8, 400 2.8, Oops! I fell asleep at work again!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
IndyJeff Goldmember 1,892 posts Likes: 9 Joined Oct 2003 Location: Indianapolis, IN More info | Bloo one time, and one time only a lady I knew asked if I could take some pictures for her, as a present to her husband. They would be shot at their house in the afternoon. So I agreed....little did I know. On shooting sports...If you see it happen then you didn't get it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
charlesu Goldmember 4,320 posts Likes: 121 Joined Jan 2003 Location: Midwest More info | Bloo Dog wrote: "CharlesU probably won't ever admit it, but nude model photography isn't all t*tt*es and beer either." --- Bloo Dog, former wedding photographer Let's hear from another species of photographer: the Glamour Photographer. What's it like? What's the worst part of it? How did you get started? Do you EVER want it to end? What was your WORST shoot? Talk about your disasters. (No name dropping, please). Come on. We know who you are. You're the guys walking around with shoe prints on your tongues. We have ways of making you talk... What's it like? Just like portrait work except the subject is often nude or in lingerie, sexy clothes, swimwear, etc. Well, ok, this is an oversimplification. But it's really not far off from the truth. Thanks for stopping in and having a look.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
charlesu Goldmember 4,320 posts Likes: 121 Joined Jan 2003 Location: Midwest More info | Answers inline.... Bloo Dog wrote: Charles, What I've seen of your work is nothing short of gorgeous. Is there much (if any) fee negotiation involved when a potential client approaches you? When I gained a certain market penetration in my wedding photography and my fees reflected industry standards, there were fewer prospective clients who even attempted to negotiate fees. What has been your experience? It's always a negotiation process. I still have people approach me for portraits expecting 51 prints for $9.95 like Walmart's Portrait Shop. They don't understand a sitting fee and they choke on print prices. For a VERY short time, I worked with models and had a few experiences in which their 'agents' (read:'boyfriends') got involved in the pre-shoot interview and as well as afterward and tried to get the negatives away from me through coercion. Did you have similar experiences when you started out? I am sure that being connected to talent agencies helps to filter most of these types out, but probably not all. Boyfriends rarely mix with glamour photography. I try to avoid working with models whose boyfriends insist on being involved. Frankly, it's a trust issue that needs to be worked out between them and I don't need to be in the middle. Also, I'm wondering about your experiences with labs. Until I got out of having to supply prints and began photographing with transparency film exclusively, I had nothing but problems with labs. It seemed that no amount of money could buy a properly printed image. I'd pay twenty-five bucks for a 5x7 (not a wedding reprint!) and there'd still be a dust spot or two. What do you give to your clients? Files? Prints? If prints, are you producing them yourself? Output? Depends on the job. There are good labs where I am so quality prints are easy to obtain. These questions are for all glamour photographers. I am addressing Charles because, well, he's here. (And he's my recently-discovered boyhood hero!) Everyone else is encouraged to join in. Thanks but I'd like to hear from some others too!!! Thanks for stopping in and having a look.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OneManArmy Member 212 posts Joined Dec 2004 More info | Permanent banIndyJeff wrote: I avoided her from then on because I think she wanted to see my long lens ROFL! (2) MkII's, 24-70L, 70-200L, 300 2.8, 400 2.8, Oops! I fell asleep at work again!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cricket Member 149 posts Joined Dec 2004 More info | From a female perspective: There is nothing worse than a brilliant image of a fuzzy concept. - Ansel Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mills Goldmember 4,105 posts Joined Jul 2003 Location: Chicago, Illinois More info | This Is A New Twist From The Ordinary. Mills
LOG IN TO REPLY |
charlesu Goldmember 4,320 posts Likes: 121 Joined Jan 2003 Location: Midwest More info | cricket wrote: From a female perspective: I had a guy who was supposedly modeling for Nike, and Wilson (Tennis) and he had an array of outfits he brought to the studio. I thought I had done a great job and showed them to a girlfriend. She turned red and puffed up her cheeks trying not to laugh, but she exploded! I wasn't sure why, but when she pointed to a proof and asked me if I thought he'd had a good time I could have died. His 'self' was poking out of the Speedos, and because I was so busy being "professional" and focusing on his eyes, I didn't even notice his um, excitement at the session. UGH! I felt pretty dumb! Then there was the guy who supposedly only was dressing up as a woman for Halloween... Good Lord!
Thanks for stopping in and having a look.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
IndyJeff wrote: I don't think I would ever agree to do anything like that again. When I got to the car, I was sweating! Can you imagine if her husband walked in on you guys in the bedroom? You'd've had to become Indy-Flaming-Jeff to get out of that one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KennyG Goldmember 2,252 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2003 Location: Leeds, UK More info | charlesu wrote: There are several things but one stands out. This needs no further comment. Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomW Canon Fanosapien 12,749 posts Likes: 30 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee More info | IndyJeff wrote: ... I avoided her from then on because I think she wanted to see my long lens and wasn't just interested in giving her husband pictures for a present.... Are you sure she wasn't looking at your 50 mm "standard" lens through 10D eyes? Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
J.A.F.Doorhof Goldmember 3,274 posts Likes: 14 Joined Jul 2003 Location: Emmeloord, The Netherlands More info | I have waited a long time with nudes or topless or glamour, first I wanted to have the basic in good order. www.frankdoorhof.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Ogrt48 Goldmember 1,316 posts Joined May 2004 Location: Fairfield TWP, Ohio More info |
J.A.F.Doorhof Goldmember 3,274 posts Likes: 14 Joined Jul 2003 Location: Emmeloord, The Netherlands More info | Why ? www.frankdoorhof.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1205 guests, 163 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||