Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 11 Jun 2008 (Wednesday) 09:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Decent lens for an IR converted XT camera?

 
ClickClick
Senior Member
801 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2006
     
Jun 11, 2008 09:52 |  #1

Hello all,

I am going to be sending in my XT to be IR converted.

I will need a decent - QUALITY - and nicely priced lens to use on this camera body as my current lens collection is on the list of "trouble lens" that has been noted.

Sig 10-20
Tam 17-50
Canon 70-300 IS
kit lens 18-55

I will mostly be doing outdoor landscape shots. In strong light.
Any recommendations?

thanks


A camera.
Trinkets galore.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowbox
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
     
Jun 11, 2008 09:57 |  #2

This is a pretty good link: http://www.lensplay.co​m/lenses/lens_infra_re​d_IR.html (external link)

Your 70-300 looks to be on the "good" list, but for landscape you might lean towards the EF-S 10-22 or 17-40 depending on your budget.

Glenn

Anxiously awaiting the arrival of my LifePixel converted XT as well.


2 RebelXT's with BG-E3 (one stock, one with LifePixel IR mod)
EF 50mm f/1.8 II - EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
EF 17-40mm f/4L USM - EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM - 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ClickClick
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
801 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2006
     
Jun 11, 2008 10:25 |  #3

Shadowbox wrote in post #5701856 (external link)
This is a pretty good link: http://www.lensplay.co​m/lenses/lens_infra_re​d_IR.html (external link)

Your 70-300 looks to be on the "good" list, but for landscape you might lean towards the EF-S 10-22 or 17-40 depending on your budget.

Glenn

Anxiously awaiting the arrival of my LifePixel converted XT as well.

Well my budget is very limited right now. I was going to purchase a Sig 18-200 OS as a general purpose walk around lens, but that isn't on the good list either.


A camera.
Trinkets galore.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott_Quier
Senior Member
888 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Newport News, VA
     
Jun 11, 2008 11:42 |  #4

I have found that the following all work well on my MaxMax converted 20D:

  • EF 50 f/1.4
  • EF-S 17-55
  • EF 24-105 f/4L
  • EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS

but only if I keep the aperture f/5.6 or wider. Stopping down smaller than that I get what I call "IR Bloom" in the center of the image.

Scott
Operation: Love Reunited (external link)
Check out my blog (external link) Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,330 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2521
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
     
Jun 11, 2008 12:02 as a reply to  @ Scott_Quier's post |  #5

Ask the conversion facility...

I would pose this question to the facility that is converting the camera. There are some facilities whose conversions are designed for specific lenses. You pick from a listing of lenses and they will convert the camera specifically for that lens. I had my D60 DSLR converted by digitalguy.com and he stated that just about any lens can be used but that I should keep my aperture at f/11 or smaller to compensate for the different focus points of the IR.

There are some lenses which are not generally recommended for IR work, such as the 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6, because of hotspots but, I am told by Dave at digitalguy.com that these hotspots are an easy fix with Photoshop.

These images were shot as a test using my 12-24mm Tokina.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wnelson
Member
Avatar
99 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Wirral, UK
     
Jun 11, 2008 17:41 |  #6

Gosh there is a big divergence of opinions here ;)

You most certainly shouldn't have to stop down to f11 and smaller to achieve focus. If this is the case then the conversion hasn't been done properly. Diffaction kicks in earlier with IR so stopping down is not the solution (if there are hot spots it will also make these more apparent).

It is more difficult to find an UWA lens for IR - the EF-S 10-22 does require a different focus calibration. A good lens for you may be the EF-S 17-85. It is a reasonable price and performs well in IR.

Wayne




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,375 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Decent lens for an IR converted XT camera?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1243 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.