I'm quite confused on which picture quality settings to use. Are there significant differences between the fine and superfine settings?
Superbaldguy Senior Member 355 posts Joined Sep 2004 Location: New Germany, N.S. More info | Dec 28, 2004 05:14 | #2 I always use the Superfine setting but many have reported that you can get good results with the Fine; I'd think that would be ideal for travelling as you'd get more images from your card and still maintain good quality.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cadenza Senior Member 440 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2003 Location: SF Bay More info | If quality is important, I'd shoot RAW first. If you're
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Generally you want to shoot in the highest quality setting unless space is limited on your media.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joeyjoeyjoey Senior Member 350 posts Joined May 2004 More info | Cadenza wrote: If quality is important, I'd shoot RAW first. This is the only way to shoot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RJSorensen Goldmember 1,706 posts Joined Sep 2004 Location: Near Tin Cup, Wyoming, USA More info | Dec 30, 2004 09:46 | #6 One can never 'add' pixels back . . . but you can throw away the shots you do not like. If you have the room on your card, shoot in super fine. Card prices have come way down in the past few years and if you are tight for space, it would make a nice addition to your ability to take and 'keep' those good shots, IMO. "With Some Practice . . . I Am Able to Believe Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast!"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
b Member 32 posts Joined Mar 2004 Location: copenhagen, denmark More info | Jan 01, 2005 22:29 | #7 When I was traveling with my G2, I set different settings for the different modes so if I wanted a quick shot I knew I wasn't printing, I would switch it to Auto for example. However, when I knew there was a possibility of printing a shot, I went to full auto which was superfine and full resolution. While I know RAW does have advantages, I hate doing post processing so I am only shooting JPG. A larger file also allows you to crop things out as others said. So you can take candid shots a bit better at a higher resolution and full optical zoom. Just crop out all the extra junk you don't want and the shot becomes a little more zoomed in. get your rogue on!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thankls for the advice. 5D MK II | 300D | 24-105L f/4 IS | 50 f/1.4 | 70-200L f/2.8 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Alnath Senior Member 333 posts Joined Dec 2003 Location: Yorkshire More info | I always use superfine, i find the differences in quality between this and RAW are minimal and the benefits of the smaller file size out weigh the tiny quality increase from RAW.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2187 guests, 129 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||