I am wondering if I should buy the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 with a 1.4 teleconvertor or go straight for a Sigma 100-300 f/4 without a teleconvertor. I shoot mainly softball and baseball, if the helps any. Thanks,
allstar25 Member 52 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | Jun 12, 2008 12:47 | #1 I am wondering if I should buy the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 with a 1.4 teleconvertor or go straight for a Sigma 100-300 f/4 without a teleconvertor. I shoot mainly softball and baseball, if the helps any. Thanks, I'm 16 . . . Give Me a Break
LOG IN TO REPLY |
05Xrunner Goldmember, Flipflopper.  More info | Jun 12, 2008 13:05 | #2 id go for the 100-300 if its mainly all daytime games. My gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is AlainPre 1579 guests, 164 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
