After I buy the 70-200 f/2.8 lens for use when shooting mainly sports, what lens do you recommend I buy next for sports. I want it to be under $1000. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
allstar25 Member 52 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | Jun 12, 2008 13:02 | #1 After I buy the 70-200 f/2.8 lens for use when shooting mainly sports, what lens do you recommend I buy next for sports. I want it to be under $1000. Any suggestions? I'm 16 . . . Give Me a Break
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JAcosta Goldmember  1,522 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Korea More info | Jun 12, 2008 13:07 | #2 I would look for a used 300f/4, maybe a 1.4x teleconverter. Like any of the photos Ive posted?flickr flickr flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DoubleNegative *sniffles*  10,533 posts Likes: 11 Joined Mar 2006 Location: New York, USA More info | Jun 12, 2008 14:08 | #3 The 300mm f/4L IS would be a good choice. So would the 400mm f/5.6L but that might be getting a bit dark, and lacks IS (which isn't so important for sports anyway - use a monopod). The 100-400mm is also a good choice, but again, a little dark. La Vida Leica!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben_r_ -POTN's Three legged Support-  15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Jun 12, 2008 15:10 | #4 I would also suggest the 300 f/4 IS. [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is AlainPre 1583 guests, 164 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
