Taken with the 70-200 f/4L...he let me get pretty close...
C&C Please...
PMatthes Senior Member 598 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Chicago-ish, IL More info | Jun 13, 2008 20:10 | #1 Taken with the 70-200 f/4L...he let me get pretty close... -Pete
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Robert_Lay Cream of the Crop 7,546 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA More info | Jun 13, 2008 20:27 | #2 Pretty good for back-lighting - does wonders for his ears, but doesn't do much for the rest of him. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Robert165 Member 163 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | Jun 14, 2008 00:36 | #3 A+ http://www.flickr.com/photos/24800109@N05/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BillBoehme Enjoy being spanked More info | I like the lighted ears. The rabbit appears the way that they are usually seen in the wild -- darkly blending in with their surroundings -- protective coloration has a way of doing that. And at the same time, he has been caught in a perfectly lighted bright silhouette -- not an easy trick. Atmospheric haze in images? Click for Tutorial to Reduce Atmospheric Haze with Photoshop.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks for the comments, guys! -Pete
LOG IN TO REPLY |
midnitejam Senior Member 806 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Parma Ohio More info | Jun 14, 2008 17:15 | #6 --Ditto-- Midnitejam--The happiness in your life depends on the quality of your thoughts.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DrFil Senior Member 513 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Los Angeles More info | Jun 14, 2008 20:27 | #7 i like how he looks very tense. however, i must say that i'm part of the majority that doesn't really like such bright, featureless backgrounds. also, his back end looks out of focus. i would try to get his whole body in focus.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 14, 2008 21:36 | #8 DrFil wrote in post #5722946 i like how he looks very tense. however, i must say that i'm part of the majority that doesn't really like such bright, featureless backgrounds. I agree with the background, however, not much I could have done, seeing as the sun was setting behind him. DrFil wrote in post #5722946 his back end looks out of focus. i would try to get his whole body in focus. Re: the focus, it's a problem that I don't know how to address... I wanted to make sure his eyes and ears were in focus, and didn't really think his back end would have been OOF a bit. Was shooting at f/4, so I don't think this is a problem caused by a shallow DOF, especially because the foreground has bokeh, but not the ground near him. -Pete
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Stocky Senior Member 731 posts Joined Feb 2008 Location: Ann Arbor, MI More info | Jun 14, 2008 23:22 | #9 I love the lighting, and I think you nailed the exposure, but the back end of the bunny is the wrong kind of soft. Always happy to hear some critique
LOG IN TO REPLY |
midnitejam Senior Member 806 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Parma Ohio More info | Jun 15, 2008 09:58 | #10 PMatthes wrote in post #5723215 However, the ground right near his back end does appear in focus, so maybe he was either moving, or it's just an illusion that's caused by the texture of his fur...that's all I can come up with... She's a disco rabbit--she was just shaking her booty Midnitejam--The happiness in your life depends on the quality of your thoughts.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2774 guests, 160 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||