Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 15 Jun 2008 (Sunday) 06:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Stacking question.

 
u8myufo
Senior Member
Avatar
277 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2007
Location: UK
     
Jun 15, 2008 06:07 |  #1

I read with interest the method of stacking photographs to achieve close up but totaly in focus shots. I am confused somewhat as to the method mentioned though. It suggests moving the camera slightly whilst taking up to 30 shots, and to avoid twisting the lens either to the left or right. Would it not make more sense considering the shallow dof, to set the camera up from the subject at a fixed distance but allowing enough leeway to focus each time manualy on a different part of the subject, surely that way the perspective of the subject stays the same in each shot. Any tips on stacking would be appreciated.


Computers are not intelligent.
They just think they are.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
racketman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
21,935 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 2473
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Richmond Surrey
     
Jun 15, 2008 06:09 |  #2

moving the camera in without manually focusing seems to work better - I wouldn't try more than 4 shots to begin with.


Toby
Canon EOS R7, 100 L macro, MP-E65, RF 100-400
Olympus EM-1 MKII/MKIII, 60 macro, 90 macro, 12-40 PRO

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LordV
Macro Photo-Lord of the Year 2006
Avatar
62,297 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 6868
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Worthing UK
     
Jun 15, 2008 06:13 |  #3

u8myufo wrote in post #5724633 (external link)
I read with interest the method of stacking photographs to achieve close up but totaly in focus shots. I am confused somewhat as to the method mentioned though. It suggests moving the camera slightly whilst taking up to 30 shots, and to avoid twisting the lens either to the left or right. Would it not make more sense considering the shallow dof, to set the camera up from the subject at a fixed distance but allowing enough leeway to focus each time manualy on a different part of the subject, surely that way the perspective of the subject stays the same in each shot. Any tips on stacking would be appreciated.

Whichever method you use - fixed focus move camera (either manually or on a tripod with macro stage) or fix camera move focus, you will get a slightly changing FOV and perspective. Stacking software allows for this a bit by realigning and resizing each picture before trying to stack them. Oddly some of the very big stacks are done using a fixed camera,fixed focus and move the subject.
Tutorial here on how I do mine
http://www.wonderfulph​otos.com …les/macro/focus​_stacking/ (external link)

brian V.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/lordv/ (external link)
http://www.lordv.smugm​ug.com/ (external link)
Macro Hints and tips
Canon 600D, 40D, 5D mk2, 7D, Tamron 90mm macro, Sigma 105mm OS, Canon MPE-65,18-55 kit lens X2, canon 200mm F2.8 L, Tamron 28-70mm xrdi, Other assorted bits

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonloader
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
52,911 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 135
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Behind A Camera
     
Jun 15, 2008 06:58 |  #4

surely that way the perspective of the subject stays the same in each shot.

It actually changes a small amount that you don't see till you stack them. I did not know the program allowed for that. There is still a lot I don't know about the program though. :)


Mitch- ____...^.^...____
Gear List, My You Tube (external link)
War is not about who's right, it's about who's left.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
u8myufo
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
277 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2007
Location: UK
     
Jun 15, 2008 07:03 as a reply to  @ canonloader's post |  #5

Thanks guys, I was looking at using CZm for stacking, and I must admit I did not realise it made slight allowances for aligning the pictures.


Computers are not intelligent.
They just think they are.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Plant ­ McCloud
Member
85 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jun 16, 2008 05:39 as a reply to  @ u8myufo's post |  #6

Would somebody be kind enough to make some recommendations about which stacking software to use, both free and $ ?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

953 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Stacking question.
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1370 guests, 172 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.