Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Critique Corner 
Thread started 15 Jun 2008 (Sunday) 18:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Quicksilver -- time exposure shot

 
Bill634
Member
193 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Quebec, Canada
     
Jun 15, 2008 18:44 |  #1

I used a tripod and time exposure to take this extreme low light ( almost dark) shot shortly after I first bought my EOS 30D. I thought it turned out well but it hasn't gotten much response anytime I've entered it in photo contests. I'd like to hear some constructive criticism because this type of photography really appeals to me.

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://i282.photobucke​t.com …634/Quicksilver​Stream.jpg (external link)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
thebeatnut
Member
196 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jun 17, 2008 15:23 |  #2

Your other option could be a much longer exposure. A friend of mine took a shot in the dark of water rather like this and left it on bulb for 15 minutes. It really brought the colours out.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
luigis
Goldmember
Avatar
1,399 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
     
Jun 17, 2008 15:33 |  #3

Hi Bill, this is also the kind of pictures that I love to make so nice to find a friend.
I like your picture a lot, it is a very nice long exposure shot, I like the cold temperature original more than the warmer edit.
I think that from very good to great the picture is missing either a subject like a big rock or something in the middle of the stream or to go the other extreme a more featureless background to make it more pure and smooth.
Just my 2 cents it is a high scoring picture to me.

Luigi


www.luisargerich.com (external link)
Landscape Photography & Astrophotography
Follow me on Twitter (external link)
My Awesome Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
griptape
Goldmember
2,037 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Home
     
Jun 17, 2008 16:45 |  #4

luigis wrote in post #5739719 (external link)
I think that from very good to great the picture is missing either a subject like a big rock or something in the middle of the stream or to go the other extreme a more featureless background to make it more pure and smooth.
Luigi

I completely agree. You simply don't have a subject (or at the very least contrast against your subject so you can tell what your subject is and isn't). Water and rocks aren't very interesting. We've all seen water and rocks. I'm not trying to be harsh, but it looks like a dirty, muddy looking place that I would try to avoid stepping in rather than something I'd go out of my way to look at.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill634
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
193 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Quebec, Canada
     
Jun 17, 2008 20:06 |  #5

I appreciate the input from all of you, thanks. This particular spot appeals to me because of the distinctive geological formations in the rock. Far from being dirty or muddy the water is absolutely crystal clear. The edit by 'LeuceDeuce' brightens the image and brings out more detail but the actual rock color is more accurate in the original. I guess that's why I wanted to shoot the scene at nightfall...to try and get that sort of surreal water quality while maintaining the deep colors in the rock. I originally entered the photo in a contest with the name 'Warlock Brook' since I was aiming for a slightly spooky feel. It definitely doesn't work for everyone. A semi-pro friend immediately 'dissed' it as too dark also. As for lack of a clear subject, I have trouble with that at times. I tend to think of it as a mini-landscape where the sum of the parts is the subject. I plan to shoot it again with my new 17-55 F2.8 lens. This was done the 17-85.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeuceDeuce
Goldmember
Avatar
2,362 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
     
Jun 17, 2008 20:10 as a reply to  @ Bill634's post |  #6

Well if anything, at least editing it got people to talk about it :)

Since you've elected to remove your original I'll remove the edit. I guess you're done with feedback.


my website: Light & Shadow (external link)
my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill634
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
193 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Quebec, Canada
     
Jun 18, 2008 14:14 as a reply to  @ LeuceDeuce's post |  #7

Since you've elected to remove your original I'll remove the edit. I guess you're done with feedback.

Huh? Not at all LeuceDeuce, I didn't remove the original. It's showing up fine on my PC. I welcome your edit and anyone else's. The changes you made don't quite match what I had in mind when I shot the image but you took time to work on it and I am grateful for the input.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeuceDeuce
Goldmember
Avatar
2,362 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
     
Jun 18, 2008 15:15 |  #8

Bill634 wrote in post #5746564 (external link)
Huh? Not at all LeuceDeuce, I didn't remove the original. It's showing up fine on my PC. I welcome your edit and anyone else's. The changes you made don't quite match what I had in mind when I shot the image but you took time to work on it and I am grateful for the input.

Yeah I just saw that. Last night I was getting the red X, and assumed you took it off your host site.


my website: Light & Shadow (external link)
my flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

893 views & 0 likes for this thread
Quicksilver -- time exposure shot
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is phot-awe
881 guests, 385 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.