marjnap Goldmember  1,508 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Florida More info | Jun 15, 2008 18:59 | #1 I'm trying different ways to get stronger pictures with different compositions, by using natural framing, etc. I got quite a few pictures when I was visiting family. Please tell me what you think and how I could have improved the shoot. Thank you in advance.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Marjorie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 15, 2008 19:02 | #2 A couple more.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Marjorie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GR8FULDAD Member  50 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Sycamore, IL More info | I like your effect with the waterfall and smoothing the water. I'm guessing your shutter speed was about 1 sec.? Nice images, I like #4.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 15, 2008 21:21 | #4 The first one was 2 sec, second one was 3.2 sec and the last two were five sec. It was dark when I was closer to the falls and I was using my tripod w/kit lens. Marjorie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Robert165 Member  163 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | Jun 15, 2008 23:32 | #5 like number 3 the best http://www.flickr.com/photos/24800109@N05/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DrFil Senior Member  513 posts Joined May 2008 Location: Los Angeles More info | Jun 16, 2008 01:59 | #6 i like #3. i probably would've went up and gotten all the random branches out of the waterfalls.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 18, 2008 09:46 | #7 Robert165 wrote in post #5728773  like number 3 the best number 1 is my second choice both seem more "compact" Robert - Thank you for your comments. I'm starting to think that with waterfalls, it has more of a dramatic effect when you fill the frame. I better get a wide angle for Niagara! Marjorie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 18, 2008 09:51 | #8 DrFil wrote in post #5729177 i like #3. i probably would've went up and gotten all the random branches out of the waterfalls. DrFil - Thank you for your comment. I agree, I noticed the branch, but didn't think it would be so distracting. It really bothers me now. I'm not sure if I will go in and take a chance busting my butt, but I can always send my hubby in. Marjorie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
penodr Senior Member  484 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Centreville, VA More info | Jun 18, 2008 13:11 | #9 #3 is a winner for me, very nice photo. The branches don't bother me too much, but I guess it would be better without them. My Gear: Canon 50D with grip, XTi with grip and kit lens, Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L, Canon 70-200mm F2.8 IS II USM, Canon 50mm f/1.8 II, Canon 100mm F 2.8 IS USM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
supaphly42 Mostly Lurking  19 posts Joined Jun 2008 Location: Buffalo, NY More info | Jun 18, 2008 13:18 | #10 I like the idea behind number 1, but the branches are a little overwhelming and take away from the waterfall a bit, especially the ones on the lower left that are brighter.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 18, 2008 22:38 | #11 Dave - thank you for the complement. Marjorie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2774 guests, 160 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
