Show off,
"shooting with the 300mm f/2.8L IS over the weekend chasing egrets"
Kidding brother, that's my dream lens
thatkatmat Cream of the Crop  9,342 posts Gallery: 41 photos Likes: 205 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Seattle, don't move here, it's wet and cold More info | Jun 16, 2008 14:48 | #16 Show off, My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 16, 2008 16:31 | #17 Double Negative wrote in post #5731988  I decided to bite the bullet and go with real Canon NP-E3 batteries. I don't trust third-party batteries to provide the weathersealing that I rely on. That's honestly the only reason I would go with the Canon batteries as well. From a power standpoint, my non-Canon battery is at least as good as my Canon battery, but I wouldn't trust the weather sealing. If I shoot in the rain, I make sure the Canon battery is fully charged and in use. John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lowner "I'm the original idiot"  12,924 posts Likes: 18 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Salisbury, UK. More info | Dan, Richard
LOG IN TO REPLY |
05Xrunner Goldmember, Flipflopper.  More info | but what you posted has NO useful information for a 1 series camera at all. So really I think your the only one who knew what you where talking about. My gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dpastern Cream of the Crop 13,765 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2005 Location: Ipswich, Queensland, Australia More info | Jun 16, 2008 20:34 | #20  Permanent banI've never gotten good performance from the np-e3's even with the Mark IIn I get only around 300 odd shots. By all accounts, that's cos I don't shoot a 1000 shots in a day, but rather shoot with the battery over a period of 3 or 4 weeks. I believe it goes flat by itself over time, hence my low rating.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
05Xrunner Goldmember, Flipflopper. More info | Jun 16, 2008 20:35 | #21 dpastern wrote in post #5734131 I've never gotten good performance from the np-e3's even with the Mark IIn I get only around 300 odd shots. By all accounts, that's cos I don't shoot a 1000 shots in a day, but rather shoot with the battery over a period of 3 or 4 weeks. I believe it goes flat by itself over time, hence my low rating. Dave sounds like we have the same results. I shoot the same way. My gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me  34,092 posts Likes: 48 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Jun 16, 2008 20:37 | #22 05Xrunner wrote in post #5730447 http://www.mydigitaldiscount.com …--800000ED-1179840777.jsp man they went up $10 in price in the past 2months it seems I got about 900+ RAW on one of those without the first dinker dropping. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2661 guests, 167 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
