Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 16 Jun 2008 (Monday) 21:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Flowers

 
Tubbed440
Member
213 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Thomasville, NC
     
Jun 16, 2008 21:18 |  #1

Canon 20D, kit lens, circular polarizer on the dandelion shot.

I think I might have had this camera 3 days when I shot this. (I'm a newb to DSLR). Comments and suggestions welcome.:D

IMAGE: http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q234/tubbed440/Random035_e.jpg

IMAGE: http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q234/tubbed440/Flowers/IMG_5721.jpg

IMAGE: http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q234/tubbed440/Flowers/IMG_5767.jpg

IMAGE: http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q234/tubbed440/Flowers/IMG_5720.jpg

Canon 7D, 17-40F4L, 70-200 F4L
http://jonsmithphoto.c​om/tubbed440/pics/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Jun 16, 2008 21:23 |  #2

All except #3 are much too centered. Too "centered" is usually considered as less than ideal in composition because it is "static". When you have balance between objects of different weight in different areas of the image the eye will ping-pong around in a loop taking it all in. When the composition is too static the eye lands on the center and has a tendency to stay there - at least that's what they taught me in Composition 101:lol:

#3 is also too centered, but it's busy enough to get you going!

Very nice colors, exposures and color balance. Depth of focus is also good in each.

Very nice!

Welcome to the roughest corner of the POTN.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
Jun 17, 2008 15:18 as a reply to  @ Robert_Lay's post |  #3

Agree with Bob..the detail in the first flower is fabulous!


you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
midnitejam
Senior Member
806 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Parma Ohio
     
Jun 17, 2008 15:28 as a reply to  @ Flo's post |  #4

While I agree with Bob and Flo, I'm not really bothered by centrally placed flower shots as much as most photographers.

I like #1, #3, and #4 very much. #2 not so much. #1 is my favorite even if it is centered. It is very strong technically.


Midnitejam--The happiness in your life depends on the quality of your thoughts.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joedlh
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,515 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 688
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Long Island, NY, N. America, Sol III, Orion Spur, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Cluster, Laniakea.
     
Jun 17, 2008 15:38 |  #5

Where's the dandelion? The first one is a daisy. Then there are two roses and a lily.


Joe
Gear: Kodak Instamatic, Polaroid Swinger. Oh you meant gear now. :rolleyes:
http://photo.joedlh.ne​t (external link)
Editing ok

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tubbed440
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
213 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Thomasville, NC
     
Jun 17, 2008 19:13 |  #6

joedlh wrote in post #5739758 (external link)
Where's the dandelion? The first one is a daisy. Then there are two roses and a lily.

Ooops.:oops:

I'm a car guy - so this shouldn't surprise you, lol.


Canon 7D, 17-40F4L, 70-200 F4L
http://jonsmithphoto.c​om/tubbed440/pics/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DAMphyne
"the more I post, the less accurate..."
Avatar
2,157 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 34
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Northern Indiana, USA
     
Jun 17, 2008 21:09 |  #7

These are all nice flower shots, the background hurts all of them.
If it doesn't "Present" the subject, it needs to disappear.
Good start, try using some dark construction paper to isolate your flowers.


David
Digital set me free
"Welcome Seeker! Now, don't feel alone here in the New Age, because there's a seeker born every minute.";)
www.damphyne.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tubbed440
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
213 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Thomasville, NC
     
Jun 18, 2008 05:16 |  #8

DAMphyne wrote in post #5741742 (external link)
These are all nice flower shots, the background hurts all of them.
If it doesn't "Present" the subject, it needs to disappear.
Good start, try using some dark construction paper to isolate your flowers.

Interesting approach. I'll have to give that a try next time. :)


Canon 7D, 17-40F4L, 70-200 F4L
http://jonsmithphoto.c​om/tubbed440/pics/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Walczak ­ Photo
Goldmember
1,034 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Jun 18, 2008 10:27 |  #9

The first shot is by far the best. I think the one thing I would change there is I would simply crop it in a bit more using either a 4x6 or 5x7 format, etc. (depending on if and how you intend to print). Rather than explain it, lemme just show ya...

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


Doing it this way follows the rule of thirds and (IMHO) makes for a better composition. Here's another take on the same image...


IMAGE: http://img501.imageshack.us/img501/402/random035e2ni0.jpg

Again this follows the rule of thirds and works just as well as the portrait format. While I used 4x6 to demonstrate here, If you were going to print this you could do the same with 5x7, 8x10, etc..

Now as to the other shots, first 2,3, and 4 all seem a little dark on my monitor...I'd check your levels adjustments at the very least. On #2, I think a tighter crop such as I just demonstrated would help but I think a fuller bud would have helped even more. #3 is interesting but the focus looks off to me. I think more DOF would have been in order here. #4, I really don't care for the angle of the flower in this shot. Here it looks as though you were standing right over the top of the flower shooting down at it. I think shooting it at an angle similar to your first shot would have worked much better.

As DAMphyne said, it's a good start. Looks to me like you are going in the right direction and as with all things, practice makes perfect.

Peace,
Jim

"It is horrifying that we have to fight our own government to save the environment. " - Ansel Adams
Walczak Photography - www.walczakphoto.izfre​e.com (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tubbed440
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
213 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Thomasville, NC
     
Jun 18, 2008 12:41 |  #10

Walczak Photo wrote in post #5745266 (external link)
The first shot is by far the best. I think the one thing I would change there is I would simply crop it in a bit more using either a 4x6 or 5x7 format, etc. (depending on if and how you intend to print). Rather than explain it, lemme just show ya...

Doing it this way follows the rule of thirds and (IMHO) makes for a better composition. Here's another take on the same image...

Again this follows the rule of thirds and works just as well as the portrait format. While I used 4x6 to demonstrate here, If you were going to print this you could do the same with 5x7, 8x10, etc..

Now as to the other shots, first 2,3, and 4 all seem a little dark on my monitor...I'd check your levels adjustments at the very least. On #2, I think a tighter crop such as I just demonstrated would help but I think a fuller bud would have helped even more. #3 is interesting but the focus looks off to me. I think more DOF would have been in order here. #4, I really don't care for the angle of the flower in this shot. Here it looks as though you were standing right over the top of the flower shooting down at it. I think shooting it at an angle similar to your first shot would have worked much better.

As DAMphyne said, it's a good start. Looks to me like you are going in the right direction and as with all things, practice makes perfect.

Peace,
Jim

Thanks for the tips!:D On the second pic, I had the aperture wide open and only one of the "stamens?" were in focus. If I would have backed off a little, maye 6 more inches, closed up the F stop some - I think it would have made a better pic.


Canon 7D, 17-40F4L, 70-200 F4L
http://jonsmithphoto.c​om/tubbed440/pics/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,045 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Flowers
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2780 guests, 160 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.