Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 17 Jun 2008 (Tuesday) 00:13
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Getting burnt out from shooting & editing

 
Bosscat
Goldmember
1,892 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Ontario Canada
     
Jun 17, 2008 08:18 |  #16

During snowcross season I was cranking off roughly 2500 shots a weekend, and this went on for 6 straight weeks. It was a full time job to drive to each race, shoot, edit, print and catalog each image for sale. I was really pooped out by the time the last race weekend came up, that I slept for 12 straight hours beforehand, but when I saw the way people reacted to the images and my book, I realized why I did it.

To see the look of shock and amazement on someones face when they are stunned by a shot of themseleves, is what really keeps me from burnout.

I find that what keeps me going physically and mentally is proper eating and alot of Rockstar energy drinks.


Your camera is alot smarter than the "M" Zealots would have you believe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jun 17, 2008 08:24 |  #17

Learn to automate. Batch certain things, create actions with stops for things you can't batch so you only have to be proactive about the editing when required, save the curves you find yourself repeatedly applying & create actions out of them; if you use Lightroom take advantage of the Presets feature and create one for each thing you keep doing over and over. If there's something you do to ALL your photos, apply it upon importing, etc.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeeSC
Senior Member
Avatar
816 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Camden, South Carolina
     
Jun 17, 2008 09:07 as a reply to  @ cdifoto's post |  #18

Quite honestly, why are you processing all 2000 shots? Lightroom has been a lifesaver for me as it allows me to sort and decide which images I want to PP and which ones can go in the trash.

An example would be my daughter's recent 2nd birthday. I had a total of 250ish shots. I went through LR and decided on the best shots of various "events" of the party. I PP a total of 54 images.

Be honest with yourself, if you pop off 2K shots are month, are they all really worth spending your time PP?


GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ryant35
Goldmember
Avatar
4,389 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 459
Joined May 2007
Location: Cypress, CA
     
Jun 17, 2008 09:11 |  #19

I find even better than Lightroom is AcdSee Pro, full screen previews as fast as I can view them and move on to the next one. There isn't even a delay from the thumbnail to the full screen preview. It is really easy to go through a couple thousand images when you can do it this fast. Also there is single key tag, then I sort my tagged images to the top.



5DMK4, 7DMK2, 24-104mm f/4 L, 70-200mm f/2.8 IS II, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 IS MK2, 17-40mm f/4, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 35mm f/1.4,1.4X & 2X TC III 580EXII
www.ryantorresphotogra​phy.com (external link)Photography Facebook Fan Page (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pixelharmony
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
857 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
     
Jun 17, 2008 10:27 |  #20

Sorry to clarify a little better here's my workflow process

I use Lightroom and what I do is break down Catalogs by events.

I filter through them and flag the ones I keep to PP

Usually at that point depending on what I want I usually have a 25% retention in photos I like.

I PP those. From the wedding though my brother did half the shooting and he did run amuck and have a lot of bad images, lots of duplicates as well. Same thing with me. When I was shooting pre anticipation to capture a moment I let the shutter go. So out of a series of 8, 1 or 2 might be a keeper. And this is narrowing the field of 25% of the keepers. So of the 2000 pictures if I have 200 viable photos I'll be happy. Right now I'm sitting at 150 and still have the "getting ready" photos to look over.

Again if this was a paid gig it might be complete different :)

Thanks all for chiming in, oddly enough it was encouraging. I can Definately agree to how the more you shoot the less you shoot. As the day progressed I shot less and shot what counted. I just didn't want to miss anything in the beginning.

If I can get away from an all day event with 800 photos I think that'll be perfect. I guess I just need to be more familiar and shoot conservative.


Eugene Kim
5D Mark II . Sigma 50mm f1.4
R.I.P - D700, D300, D200, 40D, D50

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jun 17, 2008 10:30 |  #21

pixelharmony wrote in post #5737804 (external link)
If I can get away from an all day event with 800 photos I think that'll be perfect.

I do about 1000-1200 on a 7-8 hour shoot (wedding), with quite a few being "safety duplicates" and some being shooting through a moment.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,485 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4580
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jun 17, 2008 12:02 |  #22

Consider this...In the days of film SLRs, people shot with much more discrimination than they do now, because it cost real money for film and processing, so you did not want to waste shots. A single day of shooting might result in one or two 36-exp rolls of film to process and edit for keepers. And if you were a large format shooter, that might only be a few shots of 4x5, each one the equivalent cost of a full roll of 35mm to process! I have come back with a SINGLE 4x5 shot, or even none! Too much shooting is NOT good. Shooting with a specific goal in mind is good, because it exercises the brain before it exercises the shutter. Some of the most creatively expanding shooting outings have been when going to a deadly boring locale for a half day, and forcing yourself to 'see' in ways which you never otherwise would have seen (in a too-photogenic locale).


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ryant35
Goldmember
Avatar
4,389 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 459
Joined May 2007
Location: Cypress, CA
     
Jun 17, 2008 12:07 |  #23

I shoot a lot because I have 27, 900 horsepower offroad race trucks making a 50-60', 180 degree circle around me at close to 60 mph, 3 wide and making contact. I shoot a lot to catch the action and fiberglass body panels flying off. It's not excessive, it's necessary to capture the action.

Also there are a lot of other competitors in other classes, and I need to get close to 40 or so shots of each driver for sales, and possible sales.



5DMK4, 7DMK2, 24-104mm f/4 L, 70-200mm f/2.8 IS II, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 IS MK2, 17-40mm f/4, 100mm f/2.8 Macro, 35mm f/1.4,1.4X & 2X TC III 580EXII
www.ryantorresphotogra​phy.com (external link)Photography Facebook Fan Page (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HuskiesD1
Senior Member
Avatar
431 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Brooklyn Center, MN
     
Jun 17, 2008 16:31 as a reply to  @ ryant35's post |  #24

My biggest shoot that required editing was the Minnesota State High School Boys Hockey Tournament in March. 3000 photos in two days, thankfully didn't have to edit ALL of them, but it was an amazing experience.

The second day had the biggest attendance for a hockey game on the state of Minnesota - somewhere around 19,500 packed the 18,000 seat XCEL.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,029 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
Getting burnt out from shooting & editing
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2852 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.