Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 17 Jun 2008 (Tuesday) 07:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Why couldn't I go faster than 1/250?

 
John ­ E
Goldmember
Avatar
1,025 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: Amarillo, TX
     
Jun 17, 2008 07:40 |  #1

I was at an outdoor ceremony on flag day. It was sunny, mid-day. I had my 30d set to "P." Was using my 17-85 f/4-5.6 lens. My 580 EX II flash was turned on to prevent harsh shadows from the sun. ISO 100. Exposure compensation was +1/3 (I shouldn't have done this as many pictures were too bright.) I had the high speed sync turned on.

Turning on the high speed sync on the flash I assumed I could get faster flash speeds than 1/250. However, I noticed that it would not exceed 1/250. Instead the aperture would increase.

I did not want to use "manual" outside as I didn't have time to adjust for each shot. Would using "Tv" or "Av" work to get faster shutter speeds?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


John Elser
Canon 5D MK II; 30D; EF 85 f/1.8; EF 70-200L f/2.8 IS II; EF 24-105L f/4; EF 135L f/2; EF 24-70L; Canon 580 EX II(x3).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hommedars
Member
Avatar
235 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2003
Location: PA USA
     
Jun 17, 2008 07:56 |  #2

John E wrote in post #5736906 (external link)
Would using "Tv" or "Av" work to get faster shutter speeds?

Yes. In auto, the camera is always going to try to adjust exposure at the standard sync speed, but by using Tv, or Av would be preferred in your situation, the camera will use the appropriate shutter speed and HS sync will result.

BTW, it is relatively easy to do some quick tests around the house to prove that it works.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mlav
Goldmember
Avatar
1,227 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Detroit, USA
     
Jun 17, 2008 08:22 |  #3

"P"? What is that? :)

+1/3 on a bright sunny day? The results would be obvious.


http://mlav.com (external link)http://www.flickr.com/​photos/mlavander/sets/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jun 17, 2008 08:58 |  #4

No.
Av would have given images overexposed by ambient if "Safety shift (a CFn) is not enabled.
Tv would not have allowed a shutterspeed faster then sync speed either.

The only way to get higher shutterspeeds would have been to use HSS, or turn off the flash.

edit: Okay, and then use Av or Tv instead of P.
I missed the part that you already had enabled HSS... :oops:


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
egordon99
Cream of the Crop
10,247 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philly 'burbs
     
Jun 17, 2008 09:07 as a reply to  @ René Damkot's post |  #5

Outdoors using flash as fill = Av mode. You select the aperture and ISO, camera will select shutter speed to get a nice ambient exposure. Flash will output enough power to fill in shadows. Use EC to adjust ambient exposure (which would adjust SS), and FEC to adjust the flash exposure (how much fill you want). The trick is balancing the two exposures (as it always is using flash)

P mode, never used it. :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,725 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Maryland
     
Jun 17, 2008 09:17 |  #6

To answer the question, It is a technical reason why you cant go faster than 250. At some point where the second shutter starts to close, before the first one is all the way open you get sync problems. High speed sync makes a flash for as long as the shutter is open. Because the flash went off but part of the sensor was covered and did not get exposed the same. So it flashes again. High speed sync makes the flash fire several times, to the eye it is still one flash. Light has to travel to the subject and back. So if you go too fast there is not time for it to make the trip.

This may show you a bit better....The first row is a slow shutter. The second is a faster shutter. As you can see slow shutters have a point where they are fully open. Perfect for flash. The high speed shutter is never fully open. Bad for flash.

IMAGE: http://dptnt.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/high_low.jpg

Here is where i got the image. I suggest you read it.
http://dptnt.com/2007/​10/flash-sync-speed/ (external link)

As technology improves I'm sure sync speed will increase.

www.darkslisemag.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Jun 17, 2008 09:23 |  #7

Mark1 wrote in post #5737384 (external link)
To answer the question, You cant go faster than 250 because the flash is not that fast. High speed sync makes the flash fire several times, to the eye it is still one flash. It basically runs the capacitor out of power. At some point where the second shutter starts to close, before the first one is all the way open you get sync problems. Because the flash went off but part of the sensor was covered and did not get exposed the same. High speed sync makes a flash for as long as the shutter is open. Technical and physical limitations are what is limiting it to 250

This may show you a bit better....The first row is a slow shutter. The second is a faster shutter. As you can see slow shutters have a point where they are fully open. Perfect for flash. The high speed shutter is never fully open. Bad for flash.
QUOTED IMAGE

As technology improves I'm sure sync speed will increase.

actually, no :rolleyes:

the original 1d has a sync speed of 1/500, yet the 1dmkii had only 1/250, and 1dmkiii has 1/320. kind of sad isn't it?

if you want fast sync speeds, get yourself a leaf shutter type camera


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,725 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Maryland
     
Jun 17, 2008 09:54 |  #8

Every camera is different. The 250 is for the OP's camera. I didnt think I needed to make a list of every camera and their sync speed. As he didnt ask for that. However my explination is accurate.


www.darkslisemag.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,790 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2382
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Jun 17, 2008 10:58 |  #9

WIth HSS enabled on your flash, it can synch faster than 1/250th, but in P mode the camera assumes the flash is the primary source of light. I haven't checked the EOS Flash Bible, but I suspect because of this the camera thus limits the the flash to the max synch speed regardless of whether HSS is enabled or not.

Had you chose AV or TV, then the flash would have properly acted as fill and your shutter speeds above 1/250th would have been enabled.


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Twitter (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jun 17, 2008 12:23 |  #10

basroil wrote in post #5737439 (external link)
the original 1d has a sync speed of 1/500,

Actually, the shutter had nothing to do with that: The shutterspeeds faster then 1/125s (IIRC) were taken care of by switching the CCD on and off. Apparently, this cannot be done with a CMOS sensor...

I don't think flash sync will get much higher then that: That woud require shutter blades to travel a lot faster, giving a much shorter life span.

ISTR reading somewhere that stopping a shutter blade at the end of it's travel is like crashing your bike into a brick wall ;)


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Technophile
Senior Member
Avatar
298 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Gilroy / Santa Cruz, CA
     
Jun 17, 2008 14:16 |  #11

Mark1 wrote in post #5737384 (external link)
To answer the question, It is a technical reason why you cant go faster than 250. At some point where the second shutter starts to close, before the first one is all the way open you get sync problems. High speed sync makes a flash for as long as the shutter is open. Because the flash went off but part of the sensor was covered and did not get exposed the same. So it flashes again. High speed sync makes the flash fire several times, to the eye it is still one flash. Light has to travel to the subject and back. So if you go too fast there is not time for it to make the trip.

the bolded text threw me off...light travels at approx. 300million meters/second. if, for example, the subject is 2 meters away, light would be able to make nearly 10,000 round trips even with a 1/8000 second shutter speed. maybe you meant to phrase this differently?


5D Mark II | Canon 16-35mm f2.8 L |Canon 24-70 f2.8 L | Canon 35 f1.4 L | Canon 70-200 f2.8 L IS | Canon 135 f2.0 L | Canon 400 f5.6 L | Speedlite 430EX
Flickr Pics (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Jun 17, 2008 15:16 |  #12

Mark1 wrote in post #5737621 (external link)
Every camera is different. The 250 is for the OP's camera. I didnt think I needed to make a list of every camera and their sync speed. As he didnt ask for that. However my explination is accurate.

i didn't mean that your thing was wrong, it's perfectly accurate. however, sync speeds aren't going to get much better, as rene said

René Damkot wrote in post #5738587 (external link)
Actually, the shutter had nothing to do with that: The shutterspeeds faster then 1/125s (IIRC) were taken care of by switching the CCD on and off. Apparently, this cannot be done with a CMOS sensor...

I don't think flash sync will get much higher then that: That woud require shutter blades to travel a lot faster, giving a much shorter life span.

ISTR reading somewhere that stopping a shutter blade at the end of it's travel is like crashing your bike into a brick wall ;)

sync speed is sync speed regardless of how it's done isn't it;)

P&S cameras can have ridiculous sync speeds due to that. though few manufacturers actually take advantage of that..

edit:

Technophile wrote in post #5739224 (external link)
the bolded text threw me off...light travels at approx. 300million meters/second. if, for example, the subject is 2 meters away, light would be able to make nearly 10,000 round trips even with a 1/8000 second shutter speed. maybe you meant to phrase this differently?

you mean 3 million meters/s in vacuum, slower in the atmosphere (in the center of the sun going outwards, fractions of an inch a second) ;)


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,725 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Maryland
     
Jun 17, 2008 17:52 |  #13

Never say never. Im sure sooner then we think flashes will be able to be used at every speed. I have no doubt they are already working on it.


www.darkslisemag.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nadtz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,483 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jun 17, 2008 18:22 |  #14

Mark1 wrote in post #5740575 (external link)
Never say never. Im sure sooner then we think flashes will be able to be used at every speed. I have no doubt they are already working on it.

They did already, its called HSS or ccd sensors =D That might change for CMOS but not with current CMOS technology. A leaf shutter wont get you much faster either, you rarely see shutter speeds above 1/500. SO there are options, just that none of them are quite ideal yet.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ E
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,025 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2006
Location: Amarillo, TX
     
Jun 17, 2008 18:32 |  #15

Thanks guys! You're obviously a whole lot smarter than I am. I'll try "Av" or "Tv" next time I need fill flash outdoors with high speed sync.


John Elser
Canon 5D MK II; 30D; EF 85 f/1.8; EF 70-200L f/2.8 IS II; EF 24-105L f/4; EF 135L f/2; EF 24-70L; Canon 580 EX II(x3).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,843 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Why couldn't I go faster than 1/250?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
500 guests, 126 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.