Mark1 wrote in post #5737621
Every camera is different. The 250 is for the OP's camera. I didnt think I needed to make a list of every camera and their sync speed. As he didnt ask for that. However my explination is accurate.
i didn't mean that your thing was wrong, it's perfectly accurate. however, sync speeds aren't going to get much better, as rene said
René Damkot wrote in post #5738587
Actually, the shutter had nothing to do with that: The shutterspeeds faster then 1/125s (IIRC) were taken care of by switching the CCD on and off. Apparently, this cannot be done with a CMOS sensor...
I don't think flash sync will get much higher then that: That woud require shutter blades to travel a lot faster, giving a much shorter life span.
ISTR reading somewhere that stopping a shutter blade at the end of it's travel is like crashing your bike into a brick wall

sync speed is sync speed regardless of how it's done isn't it
P&S cameras can have ridiculous sync speeds due to that. though few manufacturers actually take advantage of that..
edit:
Technophile wrote in post #5739224
the bolded text threw me off...light travels at approx. 300million meters/second. if, for example, the subject is 2 meters away, light would be able to make nearly 10,000 round trips even with a 1/8000 second shutter speed. maybe you meant to phrase this differently?
you mean 3 million meters/s in vacuum, slower in the atmosphere (in the center of the sun going outwards, fractions of an inch a second) 
I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List