The title says it all. I'd be grateful to hear from anyone who knows definitely! Thanks.
RoyMathers I am Spartacus! 43,847 posts Likes: 2908 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom More info | Jun 19, 2008 08:15 | #1 The title says it all. I'd be grateful to hear from anyone who knows definitely! Thanks.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Jun 19, 2008 09:13 | #2 Roy Mathers wrote in post #5751511 The title says it all. I'd be grateful to hear from anyone who knows definitely! Thanks. I believe the H-10 is smaller than the H-14. The H-14 will hold the 40D and a lens, but not a 40D with a grip and a lens very easily without bag mods. If you plan on a grip in the future, you may want to look at the H-16. That will fit the 40D w/ a grip and a telephoto lens. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyMathers THREAD STARTER I am Spartacus! 43,847 posts Likes: 2908 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom More info | Jun 19, 2008 09:28 | #3 Thanks for your help TeamSpeed. I was looking for the smallest one possible. I already have a Lowe Slingshot 200AW for my stuff, but I wanted a smaller 'walk-around' bag just for the camera and, possibly, flash. It seems that the H-14 would be a little bit too big and not a great benefit over the Slingshot. Thanks for the link though - I now have some measuring to do.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Shahid Senior Member 270 posts Likes: 23 Joined May 2008 Location: Toronto, Ontario CANADA More info | Jun 19, 2008 16:08 | #4 You would have to go with the H-14. I had the H-12 and it wouldn't fit the 40D with a 28-135 lens properly. I did manage to get it in the bag, but the fit was VERY tight. Try the LowePro line of bags (Topload Zoom series, maybe something like the 75AW). 5DMK3 Gripped. Sony a6000. 24-105 f4L | 40 f2.8 | 50 f1.8 | 85 f1.8 | 70-200 f4L |1000-300 f4.5-5.6 | Sigma 24-60 f2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyMathers THREAD STARTER I am Spartacus! 43,847 posts Likes: 2908 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom More info | Jun 19, 2008 16:47 | #5 Thanks Shahid, I shall have a look at the LowePro. Is the 28-135 bigger than the 24-105?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Shahid Senior Member 270 posts Likes: 23 Joined May 2008 Location: Toronto, Ontario CANADA More info | Jun 19, 2008 16:54 | #6 Roy Mathers wrote in post #5754472 Thanks Shahid, I shall have a look at the LowePro. Is the 28-135 bigger than the 24-105?
5DMK3 Gripped. Sony a6000. 24-105 f4L | 40 f2.8 | 50 f1.8 | 85 f1.8 | 70-200 f4L |1000-300 f4.5-5.6 | Sigma 24-60 f2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1607 guests, 140 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||