Just looking for an approx. number of RAW, L, and RAW+L files on a 40D? I know it will vary by ISO, conditions, etc, so just an approx. would be grateful. Need it to determine what size cards I should get. Thanks
Jun 19, 2008 14:14 | #1 Just looking for an approx. number of RAW, L, and RAW+L files on a 40D? I know it will vary by ISO, conditions, etc, so just an approx. would be grateful. Need it to determine what size cards I should get. Thanks Current Gear: Sony RX1RII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
20DNewbie "don't listen to me, I'm an idiot" 2,733 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Massachusetts More info | Jun 19, 2008 14:18 | #2 |
Thanks. I guess I'll pick up 2-4 4GB cards then. No need to carry around 400+ RAW+L files, 200 or so should suffice. I don't plan on taking more then 200 pictures at a time. Current Gear: Sony RX1RII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Skids Senior Member 330 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2004 Location: Northampton, United Kingdom More info | Jun 20, 2008 15:48 | #4 TMaG82 wrote in post #5753669 Thanks. I guess I'll pick up 2-4 4GB cards then. No need to carry around 400+ RAW+L files, 200 or so should suffice. I don't plan on taking more then 200 pictures at a time. You say that now but wait until you start pressing that shutter button.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tumeg Goldmember 1,823 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: Orange County, California More info | Jun 20, 2008 15:52 | #5 Skids wrote in post #5760653 You say that now but wait until you start pressing that shutter button. I had to switch from RAW to JPG at a show I went to as I had took 1300 pictures over the two days! I have now got 3 4Gb cards and another on the way. They are so cheap nowadays.
| Canon 5D Mk II | Canon 17-40MM F/4L | Canon 50MM F/1.4 | Canon 85MM F/1.8 | Canon 580EX II |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ccookdo Senior Member 391 posts Joined Sep 2005 More info | Jun 20, 2008 15:55 | #6 When 8 GB compact flash is easily bought for under $50, getting a small card is simply not an option.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | Jun 20, 2008 16:33 | #7 ccookdo wrote in post #5760688 When 8 GB compact flash is easily bought for under $50, getting a small card is simply not an option. i don't buy cards under 8 gig. with rebate sandisk extreme IIIs are under 50 bucks. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
20DNewbie "don't listen to me, I'm an idiot" 2,733 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Massachusetts More info |
AdeH Senior Member 598 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Wiltshire (U.K.) More info | When 8 GB is easily bought for under $50, getting a small card is simply not an option. I wish they were that cheap in this country. We pay about that amount (around £25) for 133x 4GB cards. Most 8GBs seem to be about £45 and upwards.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aram535 Goldmember 1,915 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Long Island, NY More info | Jun 20, 2008 22:00 | #10 TMaG82 wrote in post #5753669 Thanks. I guess I'll pick up 2-4 4GB cards then. No need to carry around 400+ RAW+L files, 200 or so should suffice. I don't plan on taking more then 200 pictures at a time. What's the point of RAW+JPEG? One less step in your PP? I don't think the savings are worth the loss of disk space. Gear List * www.tranquilphotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jimmer411 Thank god Im green. 866 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Pacific, WA More info | Jun 21, 2008 03:52 | #11 aram535 wrote in post #5762189 What's the point of RAW+JPEG? One less step in your PP? I don't think the savings are worth the loss of disk space. Its convienient if you want something you can quickly show. I was taking pics with my family last weekend and decided to do raw+jpg since they wanted copys of them. That way I had something that I could tinker with and I didnt feel rushed to do it. 5D3 | Sigma 30mm f/1.4 HSM | EF 85mm f/1.8 USM | EF 24-70 f/2.8L II | EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | 430EX | YN-568EX II | YN-622c | YN-622-TX |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 21, 2008 07:46 | #12 Jimmer411 wrote in post #5763254 Its convienient if you want something you can quickly show. I was taking pics with my family last weekend and decided to do raw+jpg since they wanted copys of them. That way I had something that I could tinker with and I didnt feel rushed to do it. But for anything else where I wont be sharing with the family its either RAW only or JPG only, as currently I have 2 CF cards. 8gb for raw, and 2gb for JPG. Tho I rarely use up the 8gb, even doing raw+jpg on my XTi. Exactly. There are times when I'm busy with work and going out where I don't have much time to do any editing of any sort. Or when I take pictures the people that I end up going with are really antsy to get them right away. A few weeks ago I ended up going to the water park with my cousin and his wife watned me to upload all the pictures that I took of her son that night. Current Gear: Sony RX1RII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aram535 Goldmember 1,915 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Long Island, NY More info | It still seems like a waste to me, unless your computer is from 1986 converting RAW to jpeg should take you all of 3 seconds per picture. That's all of 25 minutes for 500 pictures. Gear List * www.tranquilphotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 1122 guests, 173 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||