Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 19 Jun 2008 (Thursday) 20:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Custom White balance - a test

 
symby
Member
134 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Halifax, NS
     
Jun 19, 2008 20:34 |  #1

Another night out on the deck and thought I'd give an impromptu grey card a test. I think what came out is pretty cool, so I thought I'd share. I am interested to know how many people use a CWB a lot of the time.

Anyway, on to the pictures. They're not overly sharp, but I guess IS can't save me all the time. :)

All tree pictures are at:
ISO 1600
1/3 second
f/4.0
127mm

Impromptu CWB picture:
ISO 1600
1/2 second
f/4.0
106mm

Top Photo is with Tungsten White Balance
Bottom Photo is with Auto White Balance


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon 50D | Canon XTi | Canon 50 f/1.8 | Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 | Canon 70-200 f/4L IS | Sigma 10-20 | Canon 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
symby
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
134 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Halifax, NS
     
Jun 19, 2008 20:36 |  #2

Top Photo Below me is my impromptu CWB picture. Its one of my lawn chairs, but obviously falls under the same light. The chair was white but has turned a little grey over its life.
Bottom Photo Below is the tree again with the custom white balance set.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon 50D | Canon XTi | Canon 50 f/1.8 | Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 | Canon 70-200 f/4L IS | Sigma 10-20 | Canon 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigBlueDodge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,726 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Lonestar State
     
Jun 19, 2008 20:42 |  #3

If you are a JPG shooter, it is a must to get your white balance right, because it will be hard to change in post processing. I shoot raw, so don't worry too much about WB as it is very easy to change in post processing.


David (aka BigBlueDodge)
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
symby
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
134 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Halifax, NS
     
Jun 20, 2008 07:01 |  #4

I guess I didn't realize how much of a difference a custom white balance could make. I mean the outcome isn't perfect, but a quick PP trial and its rather awkward to get that kind of green from the auto white balance picture. Methinks I need a grey card now.


Canon 50D | Canon XTi | Canon 50 f/1.8 | Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 | Canon 70-200 f/4L IS | Sigma 10-20 | Canon 430EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Samanax
Goldmember
Avatar
1,703 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Kaneohe, Hawaii
     
Jun 20, 2008 13:05 as a reply to  @ symby's post |  #5

Wow, that's quite a difference...really shows the importance of getting the white balance correct.

I've been thinking about picking up an ExpoDisc (external link) to help me get custom white balance settings.

:) Samanax


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/samanax/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigBlueDodge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,726 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Lonestar State
     
Jun 20, 2008 15:02 |  #6

This really only matters if you don't shoot raw. If you shoot raw, then you can change the white balance very easily in DPP or Adobe Camera Raw by simply selecting the desired white balance from a drop down menue. While you can change white balance for JPG, it is a bit of a hassle when compared to RAW.


David (aka BigBlueDodge)
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
prime80
Goldmember
Avatar
2,394 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 83
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Harmony, FL
     
Jun 20, 2008 15:07 |  #7

This definitely ought to pique the jpeg shooters' interest..Nice job!


John
R6, EF 100-400 L IS II, EF 24-70 L II, EF 85 f/1.8
Full Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hughps
Member
Avatar
165 posts
Joined Feb 2008
     
Jun 20, 2008 15:09 |  #8

Changing WB in post on a JPEG results in a lot of lost information. If you shoot JPEG, you MUST get the WB right in camera. For me, the ability to adjust WB in post is the biggest reason to shoot RAW.


Hugh

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,976 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Custom White balance - a test
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1223 guests, 171 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.