Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 19 Jun 2008 (Thursday) 23:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

View Through The Viewfinder

 
Pierre81385
Member
130 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: New York City
     
Jun 19, 2008 23:45 |  #1

I thought it would be interesting to have a photo look as though it were taken through the viewfinder. Give it a bit of a different perspective. What does everyone think of this one? Comments, criticism, suggestions?

IMAGE: http://fc03.deviantart.com/fs29/i/2008/171/c/3/My_View_Too_by_Pierre81385.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete
I was "Prime Mover" many years back....
Avatar
38,631 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Berkshire, UK
     
Jun 20, 2008 07:28 |  #2

It's a nice shot.

Keep the vignette, lose the AF points and you got yourself a nice retro looking shot.


Pete
UK SE Catch of the Day

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Jun 20, 2008 07:41 |  #3

I would keep the AF points - they make it more certain that it is taken through the viewfinder.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
qtaran111
Senior Member
Avatar
530 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: London
     
Jun 20, 2008 07:57 as a reply to  @ Robert_Lay's post |  #4

Can't be a 400D/XTi viewfinder, it's way too bright ;)


Camden Photographic (external link) | Smugmug (external link)[COLOR=black] | CompuTrekker AW Review (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pierre81385
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
130 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: New York City
     
Jun 20, 2008 09:09 |  #5

Robert_Lay wrote in post #5758103 (external link)
I would keep the AF points - they make it more certain that it is taken through the viewfinder.

I like the AF points in the shot too, but only for the reason that it gives a sense of looking through the viewfinder. Though it's dawned on me that those particular AF markings look awfly digital and not too vintage. I think I'd get a better effect using the AF screen of an older camera. Something simpler and less like some high tech target.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Walczak ­ Photo
Goldmember
1,034 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Jun 20, 2008 10:10 |  #6

I really like the concept and I have to agree with Bob that I would keep the auto focus points, but I'm not crazy about the subject matter. You really did capture that "thru the viewfinder" feel but to me (and this is just my humble opinion as always) the subject matter looks like what I see when I'm looking for the picture...and maybe clicked the shutter by accident. I think if the girl on the bike and the traffic had of been moving towards you instead of away from you it might have worked better.

In fact now that I think about it a bit...this seems like a "test shot" where you may have just been trying to see if it would work, so the composition really wasn't that important. I would definitely encourage you to try it again as it's a very cool concept, with a little more effort put into the composition itself.

Just my $.02,
Jim


"It is horrifying that we have to fight our own government to save the environment. " - Ansel Adams
Walczak Photography - www.walczakphoto.izfre​e.com (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pierre81385
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
130 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: New York City
     
Jun 20, 2008 10:52 |  #7

Walczak Photo wrote in post #5758819 (external link)
I really like the concept and I have to agree with Bob that I would keep the auto focus points, but I'm not crazy about the subject matter. You really did capture that "thru the viewfinder" feel but to me (and this is just my humble opinion as always) the subject matter looks like what I see when I'm looking for the picture...and maybe clicked the shutter by accident. I think if the girl on the bike and the traffic had of been moving towards you instead of away from you it might have worked better.

In fact now that I think about it a bit...this seems like a "test shot" where you may have just been trying to see if it would work, so the composition really wasn't that important. I would definitely encourage you to try it again as it's a very cool concept, with a little more effort put into the composition itself.

Just my $.02,
Jim

Thanks Jim. As a matter of fact the shot I used for this photo was an old test shot from practicing panning. At the moment I was simply testing the concept on a number of existing photos I had. Hopefully soon I will be able to post an example taken expressly for this concept. Thanks for your $.02 as always!

Perhaps you would like my other example better: HERE (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Walczak ­ Photo
Goldmember
1,034 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Jun 20, 2008 21:35 |  #8

Perhaps you would like my other example better: HERE

Again, I like the concept but not crazy about the composition...in fact I like the first composition better. However, please take that comment as being a bit subjective as I'm not crazy about "fishing shots" to begin with. I live about a mile from Lake Erie and I see people fishing alllllllllll the time (especially while I'm shooting herons), so it's just not something I can get terribly excited about.

Peace,
Jim


"It is horrifying that we have to fight our own government to save the environment. " - Ansel Adams
Walczak Photography - www.walczakphoto.izfre​e.com (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neumanns
Goldmember
Avatar
1,465 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2007
Location: North Centeral Minnesota
     
Jun 21, 2008 07:30 |  #9

I love the concept...


7D, Sigma 8-16, 17-55, 70-200 2.8 IS, 580ExII, ........Searching for Talent & Skill; Will settle for Blind Luck!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Right ­ Cranium ­ Imaging
Senior Member
Avatar
416 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Seattle
     
Jun 21, 2008 11:13 |  #10

Um stalker! j/k I like the idea, nice work, reminds me of the same effect they use in the movies when they show pictures being taken by a P.I. or when looking through binoculars.


(Insert Over Used Photography Quote Here)
Canon Equipment - Mac Computers

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
griptape
Goldmember
2,037 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Home
     
Jun 21, 2008 12:54 |  #11

There are actually several groups on Flickr dedicated to taking old cameras and taking pictures through the viewfinder. They're not like this where the focus points and such are show, but here's a few: http://www.flickr.com …20viewfinder&w=​all&m=tags (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pierre81385
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
130 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: New York City
     
Jun 21, 2008 13:36 as a reply to  @ griptape's post |  #12

Thanks for all the great feedback everyone.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pierre81385
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
130 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: New York City
     
Jun 21, 2008 13:56 |  #13

griptape wrote in post #5765077 (external link)
There are actually several groups on Flickr dedicated to taking old cameras and taking pictures through the viewfinder. They're not like this where the focus points and such are show, but here's a few: http://www.flickr.com …20viewfinder&w=​all&m=tags (external link)

Thanks for the link! I have seen these before but not having an old camera I haven't been able to try the real thing yet. Do you know what those cameras are called, cost, and where to get one???




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
griptape
Goldmember
2,037 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Home
     
Jun 21, 2008 17:00 |  #14

Pierre81385 wrote in post #5765328 (external link)
Do you know what those cameras are called, cost, and where to get one???

The majority of TLR (twin lens reflex) cameras have sufficiently large viewfinders. They're kind of dinosaurs, so they can be had easily on ebay for $10 or so. Argoflex, Yashica.... Yashica is probably the big one. I'm sure a search for TLR camera would give you a few hits.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,513 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
View Through The Viewfinder
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2806 guests, 151 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.