Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 21 Jun 2008 (Saturday) 21:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

That Tri-X Look

 
yogestee
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
Jun 21, 2008 21:31 |  #1

I don't want to dwell on the past but I've been playing around in CS2 trying to get a Tri-X look..I used a heap of Tri-X when shooting film and still love the look..

You have seen this image before but with a few changes..


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Jun 22, 2008 01:02 |  #2

Nice shot, great expression, but I can't see past the posterization in the background bokeh.

Rad


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Jun 22, 2008 08:21 |  #3

Yes, the posterization in the one without grain is more noticeable than the posterization in the one with the film-grain effect.

In my opinion, the real problem, though, is that the grain in the filmgrain effect is not sharp.

In my old Tri-X prints the grain is very sharp. In this filmgrain effect the grain is soft and looks more like reticulation. All of which is probably due to the low resolution we are seeing in the downsized images. In other words, if we were looking at the full resolution image or at an 11" x 14" print of the filmgrain rendition, we would probably get a better Tri-X effect.

P.S. - I thought he was "Wanted Dead and Alive"


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
powerslave
Goldmember
1,643 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 18
Joined Feb 2008
     
Jun 22, 2008 09:38 |  #4

Something I tried out recently: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=523440


flickr photostream (external link)
DP2 Merrill | 6D | TS-E24LII | EF24-105L | Fuji X-M1 | XC 16-50

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cheiri
Senior Member
Avatar
689 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jun 22, 2008 09:50 |  #5

Without noise, it's a really spectacular shot!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
studiom
Member
69 posts
Joined Mar 2007
     
Jun 23, 2008 01:04 |  #6

You should check out Alien Skin Exposure 2. It does a killer job of emulating film.


http://flickr.com/phot​os/studiom2008/ (external link)
Canon EOS 1D MkIII, Canon EF 17-40f/4, Canon EF 70-200 f/4L IS, Canon EF 50 f/1.4, Canon EF 28 f/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yogestee
THREAD ­ STARTER
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
Jun 23, 2008 09:09 |  #7

Cheiri wrote in post #5769431 (external link)
Without noise, it's a really spectacular shot!

Cheiri,,here is the original..


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,179 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
That Tri-X Look
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2806 guests, 151 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.