Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 22 Jun 2008 (Sunday) 06:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Slide Scanners?

 
Tyreman
Goldmember
1,085 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Cambridge,Ontario,Canada
     
Jun 22, 2008 06:16 |  #1

Can anyone provide the model or two of high quality, reasonably priced slide scanners.
Much thanks in advance


Cambridge, ON.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JWright
Planes, trains and ham radio...
Avatar
18,399 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Dec 2004
     
Jun 22, 2008 11:16 |  #2

You may find that "high quality" and "reasonably priced" are mutually exclusive.

Try searching for Minolta and *gasp* Nikon slide scanners...


John

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Jun 22, 2008 11:46 |  #3

If you can find a good used Canon FS4000US, you'll find a very high quality output at a reasonable price.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HankScorpio
Goldmember
Avatar
2,700 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: England, baby!
     
Jun 22, 2008 11:54 |  #4

I have a Plustek OpticFilm 7200 Film Scanner. It does 35mm negs and slides and is very good quality (7200dpi optical)for a decent price.


My collection of boxes with holes (external link)
EXIF semper intacta.
Gort! Klaatu barada nikto.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jun 22, 2008 12:11 |  #5

Just did a quick Google and found this PC Mag write up on the Plustek very rapidly,
"If you have lots of slides and 35-mm negatives to digitize, the Plustek OpticFilm 7200 probably sounds like the scanner you've been waiting for. This low-cost film scanner ($199 direct) claims a resolution of 7,200 pixels per inch (ppi), theoretically enough to turn a 35-mm slide into a high-quality poster-size photo. Unfortunately, it doesn't quite deliver all it promises.

The Plustek OpticFilm 7200 claims a 7,200-pixels-per-inch (ppi) optical resolution, but it doesn't truly deliver. High-resolution scans are marred by artifacts similar to pixelization. And the overall quality and acceptability of each scan depends on what's in the photo."

The Canon outperformed Epson or HP scanners tested at the same time.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HankScorpio
Goldmember
Avatar
2,700 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: England, baby!
     
Jun 22, 2008 12:28 |  #6

I think they must have reviewed a dodgy one, mine has been flawless, the only artefacts have been where I scratched the negs in storage or development.


My collection of boxes with holes (external link)
EXIF semper intacta.
Gort! Klaatu barada nikto.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jun 23, 2008 13:50 |  #7

Nikon Coolscan.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ralph ­ Merlino
Goldmember
1,645 posts
Likes: 31
Joined Apr 2008
     
Jun 23, 2008 14:12 as a reply to  @ René Damkot's post |  #8

I have a Nikon Coolscan and it is top of the line, however it is not cheap.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Jun 23, 2008 15:13 |  #9

I have a Canon FS4000US which has given me very good results. Whichever one you decide on it is VERY important it can do 2-Pass, the second being IR which software can use to remove dust spots. Do not underestimate the value of this. You will never be able to get a negative or scan perfecgtly dust free and it will take forever to PP a bunch of scans. Hamrick's Viewscan is the software to use, imo, for any scanner.

If you are interested in it, I'm done with mine and would sell it since I don't need it anymore. I bougth it about 5 years ago to digitize all my negative/slides.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob ­ D.
Member
141 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: NJ, USA
     
Jun 23, 2008 17:24 |  #10

Ralph Merlino wrote in post #5776837 (external link)
I have a Nikon Coolscan and it is top of the line, however it is not cheap.

Which Nikon, the model V or the 5000 or a earlier version? I have been looking this past week as I have about 1000 slides out of 10K I would like to digitize. I also have a number of 2-1/4 slides but alas the scanners for these are too much for the volume I have. I'll just send them out I guess.

I have been thinking hard about the Coolscan V (~$500), doesn't seem to be too much for under $400 that is decent from reviews I have read. I'd like to know if the Coolscan V is truly worth the price.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Jun 23, 2008 17:49 |  #11

I have the Epson Perfection and it's a good scanner for slides.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Junior's ­ G7
Member
Avatar
164 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Peoria, AZ
     
Jun 23, 2008 17:56 |  #12

On average, how long does it take to scan, say 4 slides at a time?

I would love to see something that you can just feed them in and spit them out, but if the wait time is more than a minute, I think I'd have to do them selectively, not globally, so to speak - and I've got books and books of slides...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DDCSD
GIVIN' GOOD KARMA
Avatar
13,313 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2007
Location: South Dakota
     
Jun 23, 2008 18:10 |  #13

If you are simply archiving your old photos, you could pick up a used high quality Nikon Coolscan and simply sell it when you are done with it. I'd bet you'd be out almost nothing, probably just shipping. Pretty cheap long term rental. It would stink to get a cheap one, have something happen to your slides and have a bunch of cruddy scans of your priceless memories.

If it was for permanent use, it would be nice to know your idea of "reasonably priced". ;)


Derek
Bucketman Karma Fund
https://photography-on-the.net …php?p=9903477#p​ost9903477
POTN FF L2 MadTown Birds


Full Gear List & Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ef2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,135 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
     
Jun 23, 2008 18:12 |  #14

This may be offtopic, but would these scanners work for medium format film? I've recently come into possession of a Mamiya 645J, and I'm interested in playing with it, but there are very few places around here that still process medium format.


5D Mk III
Canon 580EX
Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L | 24mm f/3.5L | 50mm f/1.4 | 100mm f/2.0 | 100mm f/2.8 Macro | 135mm f/2.8 SF | 70-200mm [COLOR=black]f/2.8L IS | 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ralph ­ Merlino
Goldmember
1,645 posts
Likes: 31
Joined Apr 2008
     
Jun 23, 2008 18:23 as a reply to  @ ef2's post |  #15

Bob D,

My Coolscan was one of the first versions. I remember paying $1500.00
for it. I just recently gave it to a friend of mine.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,409 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Slide Scanners?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1032 guests, 109 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.