Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 24 Jun 2008 (Tuesday) 19:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

which head

 
beep
Member
Avatar
189 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
Jun 24, 2008 19:03 |  #1

i just got a manfrotto 390rc2 with my manfrotto o55xprob, should i get the Manfrotto 488RC2 ball head instead, is a ball head better then a 3 way head???


Canon XTI, kit lens 18-55, Canon 50 1.8, Sigma 18-125, Canon 55-250 f4/5.6 IS, Sigma Super 500, Manfrotto 055XPROB

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,331 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2522
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
     
Jun 24, 2008 19:14 |  #2

Yes - ball heads usually better than 3-way heads...

For most applications, a good ball head will allow you greater control than a three way head.

However, the very best ball heads incorporate Arca Swiss Compatible quick release systems. IMO, these are the best, although the most expensive, way to support a camera.

Another way to go is to use the 488 ball head and add a RRS or Kirk Arca Compatible quick release to the 488. Using an Arca Compatible QR, you can mount your camera with an L-plate.

I am a great fan of the L-plate system such as produced by Really Right Stuff.

http://reallyrightstuf​f.com/QR/05.html (external link)


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beep
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
189 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
     
Jun 24, 2008 19:35 as a reply to  @ RPCrowe's post |  #3

just not sure if i should take back the cheaper head and get a ball head or not, or is the head i got good enough


Canon XTI, kit lens 18-55, Canon 50 1.8, Sigma 18-125, Canon 55-250 f4/5.6 IS, Sigma Super 500, Manfrotto 055XPROB

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Jun 25, 2008 06:10 |  #4

You will probably find that the 488RC2 is a lot sturdier than the 390RC2. You may not notice the difference with lightweight camera/lens rigs and with shorter focal lengths. However, with longer focal lengths and heavier equipment you will easily notice the difference in rigidity.

In addition, a ball head is often a lot easier to use than a 3-way head for everyday still photography.

If you have a lightweight movie camera or video camera, then keep the 3-way head for that - assuming it moves smoothly when you loosen the controls for panning.

I use the Manfrotto RC2 quick release system almost exclusively and have not had any problems that would make me spend a lot more money for the Arca-Swiss style QR system.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Jun 25, 2008 12:08 |  #5

If you are going to use it to shoot "still" subjects like landscapes, portraits or macro, where precise framing is required then a good 3 way head such as geared one is the way to go.

The less expensive ball heads, anything less than an RSS etc. or similar will move it's position on final tightening, up or down (depending on the head), or the whole rig will droop slightly when you let go requiring reframing. I have neveer tried the 488 but I imagine it behaves like what I described. Anyonwe can chime in if I am wrong.

On the other hand, if you are tracking moving subjects, any ballhead is probably better than a 3 way head, imo.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Jun 25, 2008 12:43 |  #6

I had a 3-way at first, really found it too slow to adjust. Go with the 488, its what most here have and its a great head!


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

989 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
which head
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2833 guests, 160 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.