Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 25 Jun 2008 (Wednesday) 11:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Crappy prints from lab - the paper or printer?

 
musicmaster
Saw the Light
853 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Denver, CO
     
Jun 25, 2008 11:45 |  #1

I ordered a few prints from Economy Prints not because of low prices, but because they didn't rip off on shipping (for an order of 4x6's shipping was under $2, while other places will charge $5-7).

The prints I got were disappointing. The colors were dull and the pictures were all soft, when they looked fine on my PC.

They were printed on Kodak Royal paper. They had a slightly more expensive Kodak Supra. Would switching papers help?


Gripped 70D, Sigma F/2.8 OS, 70-200L F/2.8, 300L F/4 IS, EOS M5, 18-150, 22 2.0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alexajlex
Goldmember
1,292 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Munciana, Indiana
     
Jun 25, 2008 11:49 |  #2

Can you post one of the pics you sent to them?

I assume that you ordered 4x6s, correct?

I don't think switching the paper fix the issue (there may be a very slight improvement but that is about it).

I'm guessing that they might have resized the pics or ran them through some proprietary noise removal bath process which ended up softening them up.

Is the system you viewed them on calibrated (even just for brightens)?


Gear: 40D | XTi gripped | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 | Sigma 20 1.8 | Canon 55-250 IS | Tamron 17-50 2.8 | Canon WD-58 WA Converter | 580EX II | Sunpak 383

"Amateurs worry about equipment, pros worry about money, masters worry about light..."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
musicmaster
THREAD ­ STARTER
Saw the Light
853 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Denver, CO
     
Jun 25, 2008 11:57 |  #3

A few I posted on facebook which I printed (note facebook is not high res. I have the dvd with the original photos at home). They turned out fine when I reprinted them at costco

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Gripped 70D, Sigma F/2.8 OS, 70-200L F/2.8, 300L F/4 IS, EOS M5, 18-150, 22 2.0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alexajlex
Goldmember
1,292 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Munciana, Indiana
     
Jun 25, 2008 14:11 |  #4

The pics you posted look good (natural skin tones and overall colors).

Had to be the lab.


Gear: 40D | XTi gripped | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 | Sigma 20 1.8 | Canon 55-250 IS | Tamron 17-50 2.8 | Canon WD-58 WA Converter | 580EX II | Sunpak 383

"Amateurs worry about equipment, pros worry about money, masters worry about light..."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aram535
Goldmember
Avatar
1,915 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Jun 25, 2008 14:13 as a reply to  @ musicmaster's post |  #5

Crappy printer/link is a crappy printer/link, changing the paper won't help much.

Its like putting super duper gas with cleaning power instead of regular in a 1978 chevelle.


Gear List * www.tranquilphotos.com (external link) * My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jun 25, 2008 16:35 |  #6

What do you expect from economy prints? Pay for proper prints or use a different lab.

Remember when you're paying for shipping you're not just paying for the postage, you're paying for:
- The materials to package your order
- The time it takes someone to do the packaging
- The cost of postage

$2 is insanely cheap. $7 is cheap. I charge $15 shipping per order to cover materials, shipping, and my time.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jun 25, 2008 22:43 |  #7

They turned out fine when I reprinted them at costco

Stick with what works?


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sports_Dude
Goldmember
1,112 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2008
Location: California
     
Jun 25, 2008 22:53 |  #8

I do 95% of my printing at Costco (well, until the updated their photo website...now it's junk). I adjust the colors at home and send the pictures to Costco with color correction turned off.


Sports_Dude
7D Gripped | 17-55 f/2.8 IS | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS II | 580EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Jun 26, 2008 07:08 |  #9

Its the processing that stinks. NOT the paper :)
Some lab have BAD QC...


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aram535
Goldmember
Avatar
1,915 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Jun 26, 2008 08:43 |  #10

Sports_Dude wrote in post #5793649 (external link)
I do 95% of my printing at Costco (well, until the updated their photo website...now it's junk). I adjust the colors at home and send the pictures to Costco with color correction turned off.

I have had no issues with the new site. Damn good job for me, even on the large 20x30 prints that I got from them.


Gear List * www.tranquilphotos.com (external link) * My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
musicmaster
THREAD ­ STARTER
Saw the Light
853 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Denver, CO
     
Jul 01, 2008 15:51 |  #11

Well just for kicks and giggles, I ordered some for myself - half with the regular paper, half with the endura paper... and wow, what a difference. They must use a better printer for the more expensive prints because I couldn't tell a difference between those and the ones I got at costco (which I think are great)


Gripped 70D, Sigma F/2.8 OS, 70-200L F/2.8, 300L F/4 IS, EOS M5, 18-150, 22 2.0

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sports_Dude
Goldmember
1,112 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2008
Location: California
     
Jul 01, 2008 20:30 |  #12

aram535 wrote in post #5795658 (external link)
I have had no issues with the new site. Damn good job for me, even on the large 20x30 prints that I got from them.

Finally got through to the Costco Photo Customer Service Phone Line. Appraently the issue that they are having is that any image files embeded with a specific printer profile is not completing the upload process. Files with sRGB profiles upload fine.


Sports_Dude
7D Gripped | 17-55 f/2.8 IS | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS II | 580EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aram535
Goldmember
Avatar
1,915 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Jul 02, 2008 10:13 as a reply to  @ Sports_Dude's post |  #13

Where you include the Fugi printer profile they use or something else? It does say on their "support" site that you should color match the file to the screen profile and not the printer profile.


Gear List * www.tranquilphotos.com (external link) * My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sports_Dude
Goldmember
1,112 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2008
Location: California
     
Jul 02, 2008 19:18 |  #14

aram535 wrote in post #5834600 (external link)
Where you include the Fugi printer profile they use or something else? It does say on their "support" site that you should color match the file to the screen profile and not the printer profile.

Check out dry creek photo:

http://www.drycreekpho​to.com …sing_printer_pr​ofiles.htm (external link)


Sports_Dude
7D Gripped | 17-55 f/2.8 IS | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS II | 580EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,460 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Crappy prints from lab - the paper or printer?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2495 guests, 106 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.