Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 26 Jun 2008 (Thursday) 12:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Portaits

 
Alexajlex
Goldmember
1,292 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Munciana, Indiana
     
Jun 26, 2008 12:41 |  #1

CC welcome

First real go at it with the LiteDome XS softbox.

[IMAGES removed to be reedited]


Gear: 40D | XTi gripped | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 | Sigma 20 1.8 | Canon 55-250 IS | Tamron 17-50 2.8 | Canon WD-58 WA Converter | 580EX II | Sunpak 383

"Amateurs worry about equipment, pros worry about money, masters worry about light..."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alexajlex
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,292 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Munciana, Indiana
     
Jun 26, 2008 21:52 |  #2

That bad, eh?

At least on the other forum I got a few comments

:)


Gear: 40D | XTi gripped | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 | Sigma 20 1.8 | Canon 55-250 IS | Tamron 17-50 2.8 | Canon WD-58 WA Converter | 580EX II | Sunpak 383

"Amateurs worry about equipment, pros worry about money, masters worry about light..."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
soadrocksever
Member
Avatar
189 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Lafayette, LA
     
Jun 26, 2008 22:23 |  #3

i like the lighting, but the hand looks kinda weird, lol and the background dosen't do so well, perhaps a colored background would do better?


Rebel T2| 28-90mm f/4-5.6 III(kit)|
Rebel XT | 18-55 F/3.5-5.6 II
50mm f/1.8
flickr (external link)</div>

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
soadrocksever
Member
Avatar
189 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Lafayette, LA
     
Jun 26, 2008 22:30 |  #4

edited


Rebel T2| 28-90mm f/4-5.6 III(kit)|
Rebel XT | 18-55 F/3.5-5.6 II
50mm f/1.8
flickr (external link)</div>

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alexajlex
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,292 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Munciana, Indiana
     
Jun 27, 2008 07:22 |  #5

Thanks soadrocksever

I see what you mean

I will try your idea.

Could you please take down your version because I want to rework it and try it again.

Thanks

:)

As far as the hand it like that because of the DOF (it was at f4 or so).

I also did a really bad job at masking the fingers.


Gear: 40D | XTi gripped | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 | Sigma 20 1.8 | Canon 55-250 IS | Tamron 17-50 2.8 | Canon WD-58 WA Converter | 580EX II | Sunpak 383

"Amateurs worry about equipment, pros worry about money, masters worry about light..."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Jun 27, 2008 09:44 |  #6

He looks happy...

The white background, combined with the lighting has made a rather harsh image I think. The hand out in front doesn't help. The light on the face also looks a bit flat.

I also know that 17mm is generally way to wide for people portraits - unless you are trying for the funky look of no ears, big nose, etc.....:lol:


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
natjag
Member
38 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: London, UK
     
Jun 27, 2008 09:58 |  #7

I agree with some of the above comments. It's a great image, But the hand does look like its been cut out.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alexajlex
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,292 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Munciana, Indiana
     
Jun 27, 2008 11:53 |  #8

I got it.

I was thinking people were commenting on the fact that the hand was not on the focus plane and not about the bad masking job I did :)

The background is fake (used color replace in PS).

As far as the 17mm part I think that is true if you have a high angle and are bringing the lens real close to subject (less than 1 ft). This was taken at ~4 ft distance to subject and the camera was level with the subject.

Forgot to mention it is a self portrait.

(I guess that would explain a few things :) )

I had to go 17mm wide to make really sure I got my hand in the frame.

I also went with f 5.6 on the AP and prefocused on the closet door.


Gear: 40D | XTi gripped | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 | Sigma 20 1.8 | Canon 55-250 IS | Tamron 17-50 2.8 | Canon WD-58 WA Converter | 580EX II | Sunpak 383

"Amateurs worry about equipment, pros worry about money, masters worry about light..."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alexajlex
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,292 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Munciana, Indiana
     
Jun 27, 2008 11:57 |  #9

Here are the first self portraits I did the other day

This is my first experience working with sofboxes.

[IMAGES removed to be reedited]


Gear: 40D | XTi gripped | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 | Sigma 20 1.8 | Canon 55-250 IS | Tamron 17-50 2.8 | Canon WD-58 WA Converter | 580EX II | Sunpak 383

"Amateurs worry about equipment, pros worry about money, masters worry about light..."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattograph
"God bless the new meds"
Avatar
7,693 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
     
Jun 27, 2008 12:00 |  #10

I like the 2nd set better. The high key feels more pure.


This space for rent.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alexajlex
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,292 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Munciana, Indiana
     
Jun 27, 2008 12:18 |  #11

mattograph wrote in post #5803594 (external link)
I like the 2nd set better. The high key feels more pure.


Thanks man.

I feel the same way. I really like them.

I felt the same way but then some people suggested that I do a more traditional one where there is less shadow so it does not cover half the face.


Gear: 40D | XTi gripped | 85 1.8 | 50 1.8 | Sigma 20 1.8 | Canon 55-250 IS | Tamron 17-50 2.8 | Canon WD-58 WA Converter | 580EX II | Sunpak 383

"Amateurs worry about equipment, pros worry about money, masters worry about light..."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattograph
"God bless the new meds"
Avatar
7,693 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
     
Jun 27, 2008 12:33 |  #12

Alexajlex wrote in post #5803691 (external link)
Thanks man.

I feel the same way. I really like them.

I felt the same way but then some people suggested that I do a more traditional one where there is less shadow so it does not cover half the face.

I don't agree with that. I don't think facial modeling on a man can be done "wrong" -- it's all about the mood you're looking to create. Now, I would feel differently if you were a woman, but then I guess you would feel differently too!:)


This space for rent.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,798 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Portaits
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1502 guests, 132 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.