Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 27 Jun 2008 (Friday) 23:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Backgounds getting blown out! Help!

 
big_apple_ken
Goldmember
Avatar
1,838 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Hong Kong
     
Jun 27, 2008 23:56 |  #1

I would like some help technique wise on how to not have blown out backgrounds in my photos (e.g. during sunny days outside). When taking pictures of people or smaller subjects I usually:

1) Frame the photo tighter around the subject so the background (if blown out) is not as obvious
2) Underexpose based on the camera's exposure meter and use a fill flash to make sure the subjects in the foreground are properly exposed.

So my question is (assuming you only have a flash attached to the hot shoe): if you have larger objects (such as buildings) in the foreground or you have to stand further away (therefore can't use hot shoe fill flash) how do you make sure both the foreground and background is properly exposed if it is sunny out?


Canon 5D3 | Canon 5D2 | Canon 5D | 15mm (fisheye) | 35L | 50L | 85L | 100L | 135L |16-35L | 24-70L | 70-200L IS | MP-E 65 |
My Flickr (external link) / Facebook / (external link)Model Mayhem (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
doidinho
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Kenmore, Washington
     
Jun 28, 2008 00:02 |  #2

For large subjects like a building you either don't include the sky or wait until the sky is not so bright (sunrise, sunset, dusk, frontlit building on a clear day). Also you can forget using a flash to illuminate a building, it's way to big.


Robert McCadden
My Flickr (external link)
MM (external link)
5DMKII, Rebel xti, 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 17-40.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jun 28, 2008 07:42 |  #3

Merge exposures in PS ;)


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
big_apple_ken
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,838 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Hong Kong
     
Jun 28, 2008 08:44 |  #4

René Damkot wrote in post #5808282 (external link)
Merge exposures in PS ;)

So is that like taking 2 shots? One with the background properly exposed then another with the foreground properly exposed then merge in PS? If this is the case how do you (without a tripod) shoot 2 shots that will perfectly merge. When you change the settings chances are there will be slight differences in the positioning of the frame.


Canon 5D3 | Canon 5D2 | Canon 5D | 15mm (fisheye) | 35L | 50L | 85L | 100L | 135L |16-35L | 24-70L | 70-200L IS | MP-E 65 |
My Flickr (external link) / Facebook / (external link)Model Mayhem (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elysium
"full of stupid banter"
Avatar
11,619 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Harrow/London/UK/GB/That Part Of The World/Next To France
     
Jun 28, 2008 08:47 |  #5

Ken this was shot underexposed. Well depends on cloud coverage.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


Underexposed by 2/3. Same I use when taking shots of people out doors in strong light. Usually from about 2pm onwards. Weather dependent, I try not to shoot between 11am-1pm. This method works well with people also, use centre weighted metering and allow the camera to meter for the sky and allow fill flash, usually +1/3 FEC to fill in.

Everyday, a programmer finds a way of creating an idiotproof program. Everyday, the universe spits out another idiot.....So far, the universe if winning

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jun 28, 2008 10:03 |  #6

So is that like taking 2 shots?

I shoot RAW & that allows me to process 2 images at different "exposures" & blend them in PS.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
superstes
Goldmember
Avatar
1,376 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2007
Location: Southern France
     
Jun 28, 2008 15:43 |  #7

PhotosGuy wrote in post #5808814 (external link)
I shoot RAW & that allows me to process 2 images at different "exposures" & blend them in PS.

Sounds like a plan.

Steve




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jun 30, 2008 09:56 |  #8

big_apple_ken wrote in post #5808479 (external link)
So is that like taking 2 shots? One with the background properly exposed then another with the foreground properly exposed then merge in PS? If this is the case how do you (without a tripod) shoot 2 shots that will perfectly merge. When you change the settings chances are there will be slight differences in the positioning of the frame.

Without a tripod you're going to have to line the images up afterward. Can work okay, and PSCS3 makes this a lot easier, but it still is a pain in the behind in PSCS2.

Using two "exposures" from one Raw works, but has a more limited range.

Tripods are your friend ;)


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,738 posts
Likes: 4072
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Jun 30, 2008 10:12 |  #9

Every picture you take will have a different technique that would best manage blown backgrounds. Some will benefit most from two merged pics, others may need to be bracketed at the time you took the pic and in many cases using a circular polarizer can go far to help with blown backgrounds depending on the conditions. It’s probably best if you post an example of a picture that went bad.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

899 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Backgounds getting blown out! Help!
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2629 guests, 154 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.