I just started my new retouching business website, and I wanted to choose only one picture with the "Before/After" effect.
I chose this one, I would like to get some feedback on it. Did I make a good choice?
Yogue Member 105 posts Likes: 34 Joined Jun 2007 Location: Drummondville Quebec Canada More info | Jun 28, 2008 14:48 | #1 I just started my new retouching business website, and I wanted to choose only one picture with the "Before/After" effect.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fashioneyes Senior Member 562 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Surrey, United Kingdom More info | Jun 28, 2008 14:51 | #2 In my humble opinion the after is a little too much. 1D4, 7D, 5D2 + L lenses Links: Jepson Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kevin_c Cream of the Crop 5,745 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Devon, England More info | Jun 28, 2008 14:53 | #3 Sorry, but the 'after' shot looks like a plastic shop window mannequin. -- K e v i n --
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yogue THREAD STARTER Member 105 posts Likes: 34 Joined Jun 2007 Location: Drummondville Quebec Canada More info | thank you for the comments. I did it a bit on purpose to show how a bad/almost bad photo can be worked out.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AndreaBFS Goldmember 1,345 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2007 More info | Jun 28, 2008 15:39 | #5 I guess it really depends on your intended client base. I'd have to agree with the mannequin assessment. That's actually what I thought when I first saw it. To me, the original looks pretty good. It's just a bit underexposed and could use a bit of sharpening.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
swimchic Goldmember 1,378 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2007 Location: Austin TX More info | I have to agree - I think it is way overdone -Jeni
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RyanW Senior Member 287 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Newport South Wales More info | Jun 28, 2008 15:44 | #7 I think it's a fantastic example and if this is what your business is about then it's very good Canon 400D (XTi), Sigma 24-70 2.8 (LOVE IT!), 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 kit lens, 50mm f/1.8 Nifty 50, 90-300 mm cheapo! And a new Metz AF-4C Flashgun Woooo.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
markblanchard13 Senior Member 534 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: The Shire More info | Jun 28, 2008 15:50 | #8 I'd have to agree on the overdone, but just a little bit markBLANCHARD Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark1 Cream of the Crop 6,725 posts Likes: 7 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Maryland More info | Jun 28, 2008 15:54 | #9 IT is over done, but it is also an ad. They are always a bit over done. Such as does drinking a Pepsi really make it better when the bank is taking your house?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Phil.hearing Senior Member 741 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | Jun 28, 2008 16:17 | #10 i think it is always a thin line........... Canon 5D MK1 | Holga 120s | EF 24-105mm f/4.0 L IS USM | EF 16 - 35mm f/2.8 L | EF 70 - 200MM F/2.8 USM IS L | Speedlite 580EX II |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
elysium "full of stupid banter" 11,619 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Harrow/London/UK/GB/That Part Of The World/Next To France More info | Jun 28, 2008 16:23 | #11 Yogue wrote in post #5809960 thank you for the comments. I did it a bit on purpose to show how a bad/almost bad photo can be worked out. The skin texture is still there, it's just hard to see at this resolution. Exactly the problem. You have to remember, potential clients are not all going to have high rest monitors, ideally I would optimise sample processed photos and websites to a res of 1024x768. Sounds a bit backwards in this day and age but from what I can see as a user, your edit would not want me to give you money for services. They eyes look great though. Everyday, a programmer finds a way of creating an idiotproof program. Everyday, the universe spits out another idiot.....So far, the universe if winning
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark1 Cream of the Crop 6,725 posts Likes: 7 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Maryland More info | Jun 28, 2008 16:37 | #12 Very True!!! Now that I think about it. Most monitors at businesses are the cheapest they can buy. Unless it is a graphic business. That has to be kept in mind!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yogue THREAD STARTER Member 105 posts Likes: 34 Joined Jun 2007 Location: Drummondville Quebec Canada More info | Jun 28, 2008 16:49 | #13 elysium wrote in post #5810408 Exactly the problem. You have to remember, potential clients are not all going to have high rest monitors, ideally I would optimise sample processed photos and websites to a res of 1024x768. Sounds a bit backwards in this day and age but from what I can see as a user, your edit would not want me to give you money for services. They eyes look great though. Thank you very much for your very useful comment. It is pretty hard to give that real sense of difference for web while not doing too much.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
elysium "full of stupid banter" 11,619 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Harrow/London/UK/GB/That Part Of The World/Next To France More info | Jun 28, 2008 17:28 | #14 Yogue wrote in post #5810544 Thank you very much for your very useful comment. It is pretty hard to give that real sense of difference for web while not doing too much. Not to worry. I have made the mistake on a larger scale back in college building websites for projects and always left my res at 1920x1080 so all sites were totally unusable for everyday PC users. Everyday, a programmer finds a way of creating an idiotproof program. Everyday, the universe spits out another idiot.....So far, the universe if winning
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sandpiper Cream of the Crop More info | Whilst I also feel that the skin is overdone and plasticky, for the tastes of other photographers, and don't like it myself, the question is "who are you aiming the service at?"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1678 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||