Hi Guys
Comparing the 70-200 f2.8L IS USM and the 100-400 5.6L IS USM
I notice the 70-200 has a slightly higher noise level from the IS. If anyone has both lenses could you comment please.
Many thanks
Regards
Ray.Petri I’m full of useless facts  More info | Jun 28, 2008 14:59 | #1 Hi Guys Ray-P
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word"  More info | Jun 28, 2008 15:03 | #2 Ray.Petri wrote in post #5809989  Hi Guys Comparing the 70-200 f2.8L IS USM and the 100-400 5.6L IS USM I notice the 70-200 has a slightly higher noise level from the IS. If anyone has both lenses could you comment please. Many thanks Regards i have owned five IS lenses and they all sounded different http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
engsetr1 Senior Member  439 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Central, NJ More info | Jun 28, 2008 15:06 | #3 My 70-200 is much louder then the 100-400. gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 28, 2008 15:13 | #4 Thanks for the prompt reassurance lads - I've just bought the 70-200 f2.8L IS and was getting worried - fact is - I have never noticed a noise from my 24-105L. Ray-P
LOG IN TO REPLY |
philthejuggler Goldmember  2,300 posts Likes: 7 Joined Dec 2007 Location: Northants, United Kingdom More info | Jun 28, 2008 15:59 | #5 Noisy IS? Try the 300 F4.... Blog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 968 guests, 134 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
.