Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 29 Jun 2008 (Sunday) 07:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Rolling Bag/Case

 
camlew2
Member
Avatar
181 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jun 29, 2008 07:43 |  #1

Hi All,
Looking at buying a rolling camera bag (Pretty large in size). Personally I dont really want to be paying $400 AUS (About 380 USD) for a bag. I was talking to my friends about it and I come up with the idea of buying like a travel case and fitting that out inside etc and they laughed and said it was a rather stupid idea. They both look the same from the outside except for a "Lowepro" or brand badge but do they do the job the same?

Any help would be great :)


Kind Regards
Cameron L.

My Gear | My Flickr

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Jun 29, 2008 14:03 |  #2

If you are traveling by plane, any luggage too large for carry-on is not recommended. Gear gets stolen or damaged in checked in luggage all the time. I have the very nice Pelican 1510, which is not big, but fits the dimensions for carry-on and it's around $160. If you want something very nice, yes, you have to pay for the Lowepro or the Airport bags. I have the Airport International bag and it's $359 US and it's very nice. I fly several times a year and it's well worth it.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jhom
Goldmember
Avatar
1,320 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Jun 29, 2008 15:42 |  #3

I second the Think Tank rollers. Yep, they are expensive but the features and quality can not be beat.


Jim

My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fishfoto
-Krazy Glue-
Avatar
840 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Live: HVN Work: The World
     
Jun 30, 2008 23:10 |  #4

While I love my Pelican 1514 and my Think Tank Airport Addicted has flown more than 300,000 miles (or around there), depending on your needs I just started using the Mountainsmith Correspondent bag. In to months I tool this bag around the world and schlepped it to assignments on three continents and found out I loved it!

The Mountainsmith Correspondent, unlike the Think Tank rollers, has an internal slot of a laptop (up to 17"), a large front pocket you can use for clothes if you choose not to use it for papers, laptop,magazine, etc, and a unique interior you can set up for gear, or 1/2 gear & 1/2 clothes for quick trips, etc.

I detailed the Correspondent, with text and photos, on my site for flying photogs, Flying With Fish (external link). You can read the entry at:
http://flyingwithfish.​blogspot.com …respondent-versatile.html (external link)

......at 200,000+ miles flown per year shooting photo assignments and projects (and around 1,000,000 miles since 2005 , when I started paying attention to my miles) the Correspondent is the most versatile roller I have used. It's not for photogs who use big glass (I have a separate case for my 400f2.8 ), but for general use it is fantastic!

ETA: You can pack a 300f2.8 if you do it properly & 300f4 / 400f5.6 lenses are no problem for those who worry about slower long glass.


- Fish
http://www.instagram.c​om/flyingwithfish (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eaton ­ Photos
Senior Member
Avatar
996 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Kentucky
     
Jul 01, 2008 01:12 |  #5

The Airport International is an awesome/ versatile roller bag. I am not sure if Think Tank is available in Australia though. The Pelican 1500 series cases are another excellent option though. For the gear you have listed though, my recommendation of the International, may be too big for you.


JamesFacebook Profile  (external link)| Facebook Page (external link)
My Images (external link)
| My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fishfoto
-Krazy Glue-
Avatar
840 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Live: HVN Work: The World
     
Jul 01, 2008 01:24 |  #6

The Airport International is a scaled down version of the Airport Security.

What makes the Airport International interesting is that while the Airport Security technically meets all carry on guidelines,the Airport International meets some of the more 'obscure' airline carry on guidelines. Also the smaller bag can still be heavily packed to the gills for nearly any pros or amateur needs.......while still looking small enough to evade the dreaded 'at-the-gate-weighing' which some airlines are starting to do on a more frequent basis.

The closest Think Tank dealer to Oz is Lacklands (www.lacklands.co.nz (external link)) in Auckland, NZ

Mountainsmith does not currently have a dealer I can find in Oz either, however like Think Tank, they have dealers that ship worldwide such as Adorama and B&H.


- Fish
http://www.instagram.c​om/flyingwithfish (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Jul 01, 2008 07:09 |  #7

The fact that the airlines are limiting carry-on weight doesn't bother me a bit. I would easily pay $25 to have my camera gear with me instead of with the checked luggage. I have flown on small planes where my Airport International ended up in the stow away area under, but I don't mind that as I watch it go on and watch it come off.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
engsetr1
Senior Member
Avatar
439 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Central, NJ
     
Jul 01, 2008 07:16 |  #8

I bought a small piece of rolling luggage and my camera backpack fits in it perfectly and that is what I am planning on using on my next trip. I would want my backpack with me when I get to my location anyway, so I think it will work out perfect! The dimensions on the bag seem to comply with what the airlines say you can bring on, it will be my only item carrying on since everything will fit in it.


gear

http://debramckee.zenf​olio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Jul 01, 2008 07:40 |  #9

That's funny because I bought a Samsonite rolling bag from WalMart for around $40 and it fits my Domke and Velocity bags if I don't want to carry them through the airport. Also can fit my laptop in that bag. Now that I have so many real camera rollers, I don't do that anymore, but if I had 3 people traveling with me, I'd probably do it again.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fishfoto
-Krazy Glue-
Avatar
840 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Live: HVN Work: The World
     
Jul 01, 2008 10:15 |  #10

SuzyView wrote in post #5826545 (external link)
The fact that the airlines are limiting carry-on weight doesn't bother me a bit. I would easily pay $25 to have my camera gear with me instead of with the checked luggage.


The problem is you CANNOT pay any fee to bring excess weight on board as carry on. Excess weight fees ONLY apply to checked baggage.


- Fish
http://www.instagram.c​om/flyingwithfish (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Jul 01, 2008 11:48 |  #11

That is correct, so the lighter the carry-on, fit as much as possible into it, leaving all clothes etc. in the checked luggage is the way. I have never been asked to weigh my carry on because the Think Tank is smaller than most large carry ons. It is heavy, so I ask someone to help me get it into the overhead.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
32,094 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 129
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Northern VA
     
Jul 01, 2008 11:50 |  #12

And I separate the cords, and other accessories into the luggage, leaving only the essentials in the carry ons. I usually travel with my sons so I have plenty of options.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
RF6 Mii, 5DIV, SONY a7iii, 7D2, G12, 6 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children and grandchildren are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,209 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Rolling Bag/Case
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2859 guests, 154 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.