Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 30 Jun 2008 (Monday) 00:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Why no smiles?

 
thekid24
pro-zack-lee
Avatar
8,547 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Oklahoma City,OK
     
Jun 30, 2008 00:21 |  #1

So a thought hit me.

In old photos, why are the subjects not smiling? So stoic looking.

http://mysticplanet.co​m/ALBUM/DyarFamily.jpg (external link)

There is a link to an example of what Im talking about.

I somewhat remember reading somewhere that the reason they didnt smile was because the time it took for the photog to compose the shot, light the flash powder, and for it to go off was so long that they couldnt hold the smile that long.

I dunno why the thought was in my head, I was just curious.

Id like to hear what yall think

(im banking on more jokes than answers):p


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ZeroOne86
Senior Member
Avatar
580 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Virginia
     
Jun 30, 2008 00:33 |  #2

I was always curious of that myself. Never quite understood what they had against smiling and why it needed to a mugshot.


Canon Rebel XTi 18-55mm, 50mm f1.8, 430 EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
deadpass
Goldmember
Avatar
3,353 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: phoenix, az
     
Jun 30, 2008 00:42 |  #3

From what I understand it was the exposure time needed and holding a smile as the OP said. Try and hold the same smile for more than 10 seconds, not just sit there wipped, you can do that all day.


a camera
http://www.deadpass.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Jun 30, 2008 06:53 |  #4

Yep - try taking a long exposure self-portrait while holding a grimace on your face. Easier to press lips firmly together and look dour. That's why the Mona Lisa's a better painting than American Gothic. :{)#


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woolburr
Rest in peace old friend.
Avatar
66,487 posts
Gallery: 115 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 143
Joined Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
     
Jun 30, 2008 07:25 |  #5

There was also the issue of dentistry in those days...the lack of good oral hygiene led to some pretty ratty looking smiles.


People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book, (external link) Refrigerator Art (external link) and What I Really Think About (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cricketboy75
Senior Member
665 posts
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jun 30, 2008 07:30 |  #6

yeah, i think it's cos they had to take very long exposure back in the days when they used daguerrotype film...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Darsk47
Goldmember
Avatar
4,261 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 9
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Goals: 4,417 Crossbars: 1,742
     
Jun 30, 2008 08:00 |  #7

Woolburr wrote in post #5819739 (external link)
There was also the issue of dentistry in those days...the lack of good oral hygiene led to some pretty ratty looking smiles.

I second this.

I heard this theory from a tour guide in an castle/museum a couple of years ago when she was explaining all the life-size paintings of the royalty who used to live there. No one smile or opened their mouth because their teeth were horrible.


Darcy
5DIII, 7D, 30D, 24-70 2.8IIL, 85MM 1.2 II
L; 70-200 2.8L IS; 580EX II; a hearty laugh;
Pair of AB 800s & lots of other stuff 'n' junk.
POTN Fantasy Football; aka Wide Right (charter member & perennial also ran)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cricketboy75
Senior Member
665 posts
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jun 30, 2008 08:02 |  #8

wow, i've never heard that one before, but it makes sense!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
codex0
"Scut Farkus"
Avatar
1,062 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
     
Jun 30, 2008 08:43 |  #9

I agree with most of the above theories. Having done wet-plate and daguerreotypy, there is also the fact that the processes are only blue-sensitive. This tends to exaggerate any wrinkles in the face, and as one modern daguerreotypist said, "removes 4/7 of any smile." I've had some people smile and it almost always ends up looking like an angry grimace.

It could also be a cultural thing - prior to photography, there were painted portraits. How many of those have a big cheesy grin on them? When you're just looking at someone normally in everyday life do they have a huge smile on their face? Though I agree that there are a number of reasons why people didn't smile, I think to some extent the smile in picture hadn't yet been "invented."


Cody Goddard
[/U] Thanks in advance for comments and criticism.
CAMERAS! I USE CAMERAS!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Darsk47
Goldmember
Avatar
4,261 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 9
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Goals: 4,417 Crossbars: 1,742
     
Jun 30, 2008 08:53 |  #10

codex0 wrote in post #5820140 (external link)
When you're just looking at someone normally in everyday life do they have a huge smile on their face?

Which is why passport photos cannot have the subject smiling (for a Canadian passport anyway - I assume it's the same elsewhere)

The authorities want you in a 'normal' look because you're on camera so many times in an airport....looking normal.

Unless you're the miniscule portion of the population that walks around like Carol Brady with a giant grin all day long. :D


Darcy
5DIII, 7D, 30D, 24-70 2.8IIL, 85MM 1.2 II
L; 70-200 2.8L IS; 580EX II; a hearty laugh;
Pair of AB 800s & lots of other stuff 'n' junk.
POTN Fantasy Football; aka Wide Right (charter member & perennial also ran)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
20droger
Cream of the Crop
14,685 posts
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jun 30, 2008 09:54 as a reply to  @ Darsk47's post |  #11

Besides, your passport photo serves as a timer. As the late Erma Bombeck once said, when you start to look like your passport photo, it's time to go home.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yogestee
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
Jun 30, 2008 10:03 as a reply to  @ 20droger's post |  #12

Its more to do with the long exposures needed to expose the film..In most studios the subject had to be strapped or braced to stop any subject movement.. Remember in those days cameras didn't have shutters.. The film was loaded, the subject set up and the lens cap removed,,the lens cap acted as the shutter.. Apertures of F/16 and 12ISO was common.. I heard a story where a photographer would estimate his exposure by removing his lens cap and drinking a luke warm cup of tea..


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thekid24
THREAD ­ STARTER
pro-zack-lee
Avatar
8,547 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Oklahoma City,OK
     
Jun 30, 2008 11:50 |  #13

Woolburr wrote in post #5819739 (external link)
There was also the issue of dentistry in those days...the lack of good oral hygiene led to some pretty ratty looking smiles.

A very good point. Thanks.

codex0 wrote in post #5820140 (external link)
I agree with most of the above theories. Having done wet-plate and daguerreotypy, there is also the fact that the processes are only blue-sensitive. This tends to exaggerate any wrinkles in the face, and as one modern daguerreotypist said, "removes 4/7 of any smile." I've had some people smile and it almost always ends up looking like an angry grimace.

It could also be a cultural thing - prior to photography, there were painted portraits. How many of those have a big cheesy grin on them? When you're just looking at someone normally in everyday life do they have a huge smile on their face? Though I agree that there are a number of reasons why people didn't smile, I think to some extent the smile in picture hadn't yet been "invented."

I didnt know that. And could see why noone wanted to smile if that were the case. Thanks for that explanation.

Darsk47 wrote in post #5820182 (external link)
Which is why passport photos cannot have the subject smiling (for a Canadian passport anyway - I assume it's the same elsewhere)

The authorities want you in a 'normal' look because you're on camera so many times in an airport....looking normal.

Unless you're the miniscule portion of the population that walks around like Carol Brady with a giant grin all day long. :D

I smiled in mine, well maybe it was a strong grin, but nonetheless, I was never told not to...hmm. I dunno.

yogestee wrote in post #5820506 (external link)
Its more to do with the long exposures needed to expose the film..In most studios the subject had to be strapped or braced to stop any subject movement.. Remember in those days cameras didn't have shutters.. The film was loaded, the subject set up and the lens cap removed,,the lens cap acted as the shutter.. Apertures of F/16 and 12ISO was common.. I heard a story where a photographer would estimate his exposure by removing his lens cap and drinking a luke warm cup of tea..

Lens cap as a shutter, never thought of that either.

Wow a random thought that popped into my head last night had so many variables in answers.

Thanks all.


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BillsBayou
In trouble with my wife
Avatar
5,025 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Mar 2006
Location: New Orleans, La. USA! Favorite Cheese: Caciocavallo Invention: Incendiary Spit-Bomb Wait. What?
     
Jun 30, 2008 13:46 |  #14

thekid24 wrote in post #5818522 (external link)
So a thought hit me.

In old photos, why are the subjects not smiling? So stoic looking.

Nothing was in color. Color wasn't invented until much later. The sky was gray. The grass was gray. Flowers were gray. Then when color was invented, everyone was happy.


Take only pictures, leave only footprints...
"Cameras don't shoot people. Photographers shoot people." - Me
I must not break rule GN.4, Please help me un-see that photo, I must not break rule GN.4...
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MattMoore
Goldmember
Avatar
1,839 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, TX - USA
     
Jun 30, 2008 13:48 |  #15

Not smiling in photos gives you street creds.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,496 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
Why no smiles?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1588 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.