Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 30 Jun 2008 (Monday) 07:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best way to wirelessly trigger 3 flashes?

 
Orlandoech
Senior Member
Avatar
667 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
     
Jun 30, 2008 07:19 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

What would be the best way to wirelessly trigger 3 Canon 430ex Flashes?

Option;

1. Canon ST-E2
2. PW Plus II
3. Cactus Trigger

Price isnt really a factor unless its a $600 solution lol. I currently have 3 Canon 430ex flashes, would it be better to sell 1 of them and buy a Canon 580ex to assist/trigger the other 2 Canon 430ex's to flash?

I primarily do Automotive photography and may need to shot the car from close, while the flashes may need to be slightly behind me (so not directly in front of me), where this may be an issue for the Canon ST-E2. Im also going to be using a flash in a Softbox (http://www.adorama.com​/WEARF.html (external link)) so I will need the trigger to be able to trigger the flash thats in the SB.

Thanks for all your help.


Orlandoech Automotive Photography - www.Orlandoech.com (external link) - My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jun 30, 2008 07:41 |  #2

If you're going to be shooting indoors, the ST-E2 shouldn't be a problem even if the slaves are placed behind you or in a softbox because the command signal will reflect off the cars and be seen by the slaves. The signal should even make it through the softbox, too.

Of course, outdoors under bright daylight, the ST-E2 may give you a problems so the other two options may be the better alternatives if you're not going to be tied to only using ETTL (i.e. you'll need to set the flash in manual mode for these).


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Orlandoech
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
667 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
     
Jun 30, 2008 07:57 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

PacAce wrote in post #5819829 (external link)
If you're going to be shooting indoors, the ST-E2 shouldn't be a problem even if the slaves are placed behind you or in a softbox because the command signal will reflect off the cars and be seen by the slaves. The signal should even make it through the softbox, too.

Of course, outdoors under bright daylight, the ST-E2 may give you a problems so the other two options may be the better alternatives if you're not going to be tied to only using ETTL (i.e. you'll need to set the flash in manual mode for these).

Ill almost never be doing indoor photography. Cars will always be outside, whether during the day or night. People shots will be outside as well and VERY rarely indoors.

So really, Im looking for the best universal way to trigger 3 flashes.


Orlandoech Automotive Photography - www.Orlandoech.com (external link) - My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jun 30, 2008 08:14 |  #4

Orlandoech wrote in post #5819911 (external link)
Ill almost never be doing indoor photography. Cars will always be outside, whether during the day or night. People shots will be outside as well and VERY rarely indoors.

So really, Im looking for the best universal way to trigger 3 flashes.

Out of the three, the PocketWizards would be my choice if I were making it. :)

And the Elinchrom SkyPorts as a second choice even though you didn't list them.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Orlandoech
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
667 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
     
Jun 30, 2008 08:17 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

PacAce wrote in post #5820006 (external link)
Out of the three, the PocketWizards would be my choice if I were making it. :)

thanks. could you possibly explain why for me? Im a newb and i apologize lol.

Would you use the PW-II to trigger 3x 430ex's, or would you sell 1 430ex and get a 580ex?


Orlandoech Automotive Photography - www.Orlandoech.com (external link) - My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sgt.
Senior Member
Avatar
914 posts
Gallery: 56 photos
Likes: 671
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Cambridge,Ontario
     
Jun 30, 2008 08:21 as a reply to  @ Orlandoech's post |  #6

Go for the skyports!


Iain
7D MKII
Another minion in the Pondrader fan club

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Jun 30, 2008 08:22 |  #7

Orlandoech wrote in post #5820012 (external link)
thanks. could you possibly explain why for me? Im a newb and i apologize lol.

Would you use the PW-II to trigger 3x 430ex's, or would you sell 1 430ex and get a 580ex?

Except for about a stop increase in light output from the 580EX, it really doesn't offer anything more over the 430EX in the setup you are talking about. If the 430EX is coming up just a tad short as the main light, then, yes, I would exchange one of the 430EX for the 580EX.

BTW, yes, I would get a PW unit for each flash even with a 580EX in the mix.

The reason I'd go with the PW (or the Skyports) over the Cactus is because I know the PW units are very robust and reliable. Although I've never worked with the Cactus units, I've read of other Cactus owners having issues with their units.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Village_Idiot
GREATEST POTN MEMBER EVER
Avatar
3,695 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Durt Burg, WV
     
Jun 30, 2008 08:25 |  #8

The only advantage of selling a 430 for a 580 if you're using PW's is a very slight increase in power. Not worth it imo. Since you're shooting in Manual mode and lose ETTL, you lose all the advantages of the features of the expensive flashes. At that point, a fully manual $80 Sunpak 383 becomes the exact same thing as a Canon 580EX II.

The PW (or other reliable radio triggers) are going to be your best bet because they communicate with a radio frequency that can fire (supposedly) up to 1600' with some units. Using something like the ST-E2 controls the other flashes optically. That means if there's another bright source of light (like the sun) then it might interfere with the operation of the unit and misfires can occur.

Short of sticking the car in a dome of concrete and trying to get the lights to work from the outside, a reliable radio trigger shouldn't fail you.


My village called. I was told that they missed me.

Speedotron users, untie!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Orlandoech
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
667 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
     
Jun 30, 2008 08:35 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

Village_Idiot wrote in post #5820052 (external link)
The only advantage of selling a 430 for a 580 if you're using PW's is a very slight increase in power. Not worth it imo. Since you're shooting in Manual mode and lose ETTL, you lose all the advantages of the features of the expensive flashes. At that point, a fully manual $80 Sunpak 383 becomes the exact same thing as a Canon 580EX II.

The PW (or other reliable radio triggers) are going to be your best bet because they communicate with a radio frequency that can fire (supposedly) up to 1600' with some units. Using something like the ST-E2 controls the other flashes optically. That means if there's another bright source of light (like the sun) then it might interfere with the operation of the unit and misfires can occur.

Short of sticking the car in a dome of concrete and trying to get the lights to work from the outside, a reliable radio trigger shouldn't fail you.

Thanks!

Would all would I need for a PW-II setup? 1 kit plus 2 additional receivers, any brackets, or extra cables?


Orlandoech Automotive Photography - www.Orlandoech.com (external link) - My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Village_Idiot
GREATEST POTN MEMBER EVER
Avatar
3,695 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Durt Burg, WV
     
Jun 30, 2008 08:39 |  #10

Orlandoech wrote in post #5820101 (external link)
Thanks!

Would all would I need for a PW-II setup? 1 kit plus 2 additional receivers, any brackets, or extra cables?

You would need 4 PW PII's to trigger all three of your flashes at once and three 3.5mm miniphone to hotshoe cables.


My village called. I was told that they missed me.

Speedotron users, untie!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shimmishim
Goldmember
1,602 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
     
Jun 30, 2008 08:46 |  #11

But getting 4 PW II definitely puts you way out of the $600 budge you had previously mentioned. Each units is a little shy of $200.

Assuming you don't need the 1600' range, the skyports should serve you well. I plan on getting these instead of the PW II's.


Call me John | JSP Blog (external link) | flickr (external link) |facebook (external link) | twitter (external link)
Canon 5D Mark III + a few L lenses
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=654812

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Orlandoech
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
667 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
     
Jun 30, 2008 08:47 |  #12
bannedPermanent ban

Village_Idiot wrote in post #5820125 (external link)
You would need 4 PW PII's to trigger all three of your flashes at once and three 3.5mm miniphone to hotshoe cables.

Wow, expensive lol. Would I need any brackets to mount the PW to or do they come with them?


Orlandoech Automotive Photography - www.Orlandoech.com (external link) - My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Orlandoech
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
667 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
     
Jun 30, 2008 08:50 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

Sgt. wrote in post #5820029 (external link)
Go for the skyports!

Can you provide a link for me?


Orlandoech Automotive Photography - www.Orlandoech.com (external link) - My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Village_Idiot
GREATEST POTN MEMBER EVER
Avatar
3,695 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Durt Burg, WV
     
Jun 30, 2008 08:59 |  #14

Orlandoech wrote in post #5820159 (external link)
Wow, expensive lol. Would I need any brackets to mount the PW to or do they come with them?

No brackets. Some one makes a case that attaches to the PW's that you can attach to the light stand. I just use 10' ball bungees to attach the PW to the flash.


My village called. I was told that they missed me.

Speedotron users, untie!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,725 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Maryland
     
Jun 30, 2008 09:00 |  #15

Just wonering why it HAS to be wireless? Your description does not sound like you will have the lights very far apart. I think I would look at wired options as well. They are 100% reliable and not really restrictive.


www.darkslisemag.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,564 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Best way to wirelessly trigger 3 flashes?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2536 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.