Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 30 Jun 2008 (Monday) 19:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Newborn studio portraits

 
TTGator
Senior Member
Avatar
649 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: High Point, NC
     
Jun 30, 2008 19:58 |  #1

Did a newborn shoot yesterday. Please supply your normal dose of C&C :)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


5DII & 5DIII | 85 F1.8 | 100mm F2.8 Macro | 16-35 II L | 35L | 24-105 F4L [COLOR=black]| 70-200 F2.8 IS L | Speedlite 540EX | AB800(x4) | Manfrotto 561BHDV Monopod |
Radiopopper JrX | Newton Di100FR2 | Sekonic L-358 | Lastolite TriGrip | A long Christmas list
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TTGator
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
649 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: High Point, NC
     
Jun 30, 2008 19:59 |  #2

more


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


5DII & 5DIII | 85 F1.8 | 100mm F2.8 Macro | 16-35 II L | 35L | 24-105 F4L [COLOR=black]| 70-200 F2.8 IS L | Speedlite 540EX | AB800(x4) | Manfrotto 561BHDV Monopod |
Radiopopper JrX | Newton Di100FR2 | Sekonic L-358 | Lastolite TriGrip | A long Christmas list
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TTGator
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
649 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: High Point, NC
     
Jun 30, 2008 20:01 |  #3

and one more


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


5DII & 5DIII | 85 F1.8 | 100mm F2.8 Macro | 16-35 II L | 35L | 24-105 F4L [COLOR=black]| 70-200 F2.8 IS L | Speedlite 540EX | AB800(x4) | Manfrotto 561BHDV Monopod |
Radiopopper JrX | Newton Di100FR2 | Sekonic L-358 | Lastolite TriGrip | A long Christmas list
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sevillafox
I'm good with pathetic! Really, I am.
Avatar
25,223 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Southwest Wisconsin
     
Jun 30, 2008 20:51 |  #4

These are cute but I wish you hadn't cropped off the cute little baby feet. Plus, there's something about the lighting that I don't really care for. It's almost too harsh when you'd expect it to be softer with a newborn. But, that's just my personal opinion so please take it with a grain of salt. :)


Tiffany
hopeless smooshoholic......I smoosh!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kajawhit
Senior Member
887 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2008
     
Jun 30, 2008 21:05 |  #5

hmmm the lighting looks way too harsh?? Not sure what your set up was? or maybe you were going for that look?
I did a little play to try to even out the shadows a bit. I am not very good at this, but it will give you an idea of the difference in lighting

IMAGE: http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i309/kajawhit/BW-baby.jpg

Canon 5D
24-70 mm, 50 mm, 85 mm 1.8, 100mm macro, 200 mm ~580 ex II,
**Garage Studio***
Motorized backdrop system, 20+canvas backdrops, lots of lighting, and too many props :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TTGator
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
649 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: High Point, NC
     
Jul 01, 2008 09:44 |  #6

I like your edit too, but yes, I was going for the shadowy/contrasty look. First time trying this sort of lighting.

Setup was a softbox on camera right and an umbrella on camera left. Also a reflector on camera left to reflect a little of the softbox up.


5DII & 5DIII | 85 F1.8 | 100mm F2.8 Macro | 16-35 II L | 35L | 24-105 F4L [COLOR=black]| 70-200 F2.8 IS L | Speedlite 540EX | AB800(x4) | Manfrotto 561BHDV Monopod |
Radiopopper JrX | Newton Di100FR2 | Sekonic L-358 | Lastolite TriGrip | A long Christmas list
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
burntpixel
Senior Member
Avatar
879 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Down South
     
Jul 01, 2008 12:53 |  #7

Hey Gator,
I will agree with the others on the light being a touch harsh. The best one (in my eye) is the one of mommy, daddy and baby.

How far away was the softbox on camera right from them?

By the way, if this is what you were looking to do then it looks good ;)


Matt | Gear | Site (external link) | flick (external link)r | fb (external link) | twitter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
luv2sign20
Member
151 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Idaho
     
Jul 01, 2008 13:56 as a reply to  @ burntpixel's post |  #8

maybe two other things I would suggest is..
1)If it were me I would work a little on the moms arm hair.... to me its a little distracting
2) in pic with both parents, I would have maybe put mom behind dad so that she looks a little tinier. Not that she is a big girl or anything, quite the opposite, but every woman prefers to seem small. Anything that is straight on in the camera tends to look bigger. Even if it's not the intention....

Other than those 2 things along with the lighting, I think you did a good job! Keep up the good work!


Shawna

"After all is said and done, there's not much to say or to do." Dr. Frank

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TTGator
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
649 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: High Point, NC
     
Jul 01, 2008 14:05 |  #9

burntpixel wrote in post #5828410 (external link)
Hey Gator,
I will agree with the others on the light being a touch harsh. The best one (in my eye) is the one of mommy, daddy and baby.

How far away was the softbox on camera right from them?

By the way, if this is what you were looking to do then it looks good ;)

It was fairly close... probably 4 feet. Had to work in their living room, which wasn't that big. I probably could have gotten it another foot or two further away, with some additional furniture re-arrangement, which I guess I should have done.

luv2sign20 wrote in post #5828794 (external link)
maybe two other things I would suggest is..
1)If it were me I would work a little on the moms arm hair.... to me its a little distracting
2) in pic with both parents, I would have maybe put mom behind dad so that she looks a little tinier. Not that she is a big girl or anything, quite the opposite, but every woman prefers to seem small. Anything that is straight on in the camera tends to look bigger. Even if it's not the intention....

Other than those 2 things along with the lighting, I think you did a good job! Keep up the good work!

Yeah, I was really surprised when I saw that dad looks pretty small compared to mom after seeing the image. I stopped and tried to think if she was taller than him or what, but I guess it was just the angle.

I had to do a lot of work on fixing stray hairs from mom, so I didn't even notice arm hair :) Thanks.


5DII & 5DIII | 85 F1.8 | 100mm F2.8 Macro | 16-35 II L | 35L | 24-105 F4L [COLOR=black]| 70-200 F2.8 IS L | Speedlite 540EX | AB800(x4) | Manfrotto 561BHDV Monopod |
Radiopopper JrX | Newton Di100FR2 | Sekonic L-358 | Lastolite TriGrip | A long Christmas list
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DigitalSpecialist
Goldmember
Avatar
2,286 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2008
Location: Finding a New World, thru my camera
     
Jul 01, 2008 15:57 |  #10

Try having both parents wearing dark clothing so to highlight the child much better. I agree about the lighting, but with one exception. It appears your using dual lighting in your studio. Try using only one light with a diffuser or White box!


JIM
EOS 630, 1N, 1DsMkII, and 5D/wgrip and some L glass.....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TTGator
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
649 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: High Point, NC
     
Jul 02, 2008 10:14 |  #11

DigitalSpecialist wrote in post #5829502 (external link)
Try having both parents wearing dark clothing so to highlight the child much better. I agree about the lighting, but with one exception. It appears your using dual lighting in your studio. Try using only one light with a diffuser or White box!

Hmm... they are both wearing black shirts here. Not sure how using only one light would change things, besides making MORE contrast, which I definitely don't want.


5DII & 5DIII | 85 F1.8 | 100mm F2.8 Macro | 16-35 II L | 35L | 24-105 F4L [COLOR=black]| 70-200 F2.8 IS L | Speedlite 540EX | AB800(x4) | Manfrotto 561BHDV Monopod |
Radiopopper JrX | Newton Di100FR2 | Sekonic L-358 | Lastolite TriGrip | A long Christmas list
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jenirose3
Goldmember
Avatar
1,268 posts
Joined Jun 2006
     
Jul 02, 2008 10:33 |  #12

I agree the lighting was a bit harsh. Too close to the subjects maybe? or too much power? The second to last one would be great ( I love the dad in this shot) but the position of your light has the baby's eyes dark and it really ruins the shot unfortunately. You probably could of turned them a little CCW or brought the light closer to you and camera.


Jeni
Canon 5D|20D|L Glass|Primes|ABs|580ex​II|pocketwizards
Looking for: Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
http://www.lolaandme.c​om (external link), http://www.provocateur​photography.com (external link), http://www.modelmayhem​.com/provocateurphotog​raphy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TTGator
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
649 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: High Point, NC
     
Jul 02, 2008 10:38 |  #13

yeah, I think that next time I'll try a more traditional lighting setup. Overall it doesn't seem to be flying for folks. Although mom loved them of course, but she woulda loved them either way I'm sure :)


5DII & 5DIII | 85 F1.8 | 100mm F2.8 Macro | 16-35 II L | 35L | 24-105 F4L [COLOR=black]| 70-200 F2.8 IS L | Speedlite 540EX | AB800(x4) | Manfrotto 561BHDV Monopod |
Radiopopper JrX | Newton Di100FR2 | Sekonic L-358 | Lastolite TriGrip | A long Christmas list
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
burntpixel
Senior Member
Avatar
879 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Down South
     
Jul 02, 2008 10:47 |  #14

Off topic just a bit here Gator; are these friends of yours? Just wondering how you just moved to a new area and already getting clients?


Matt | Gear | Site (external link) | flick (external link)r | fb (external link) | twitter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jillybean
Senior Member
813 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Columbus, IN
     
Jul 02, 2008 11:59 |  #15

stay with the one light- turn it down and add a reflector to the front so that the shadow in front are not quite so harsh. Watch the pic of just dad and child he looks like a floating head ( could be my monitor :). I do like your poses and yes any momma will love these of her new baby


jill
www.justjillphoto.com (external link)
www.photosbyjill.blogs​pot.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,163 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Newborn studio portraits
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1040 guests, 114 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.