Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 01 Jul 2008 (Tuesday) 18:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Question about camera shake

 
midnight_rider
"Thrown under the bus."
Avatar
5,413 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Yonder by the crick, Ga
     
Jul 01, 2008 18:50 |  #1

I have searched but came back empty handed. I have a question about the ss vs camera shake. I know that you are supposed to use the reciprocal of your focal length to reduce shake and include the crop factor. But is that because the lens length changes. I have a 70-200 and it is a non extending zoom so does that mean that I have to shoot at or above 1/320 at all times?


I never, Not once claimed to read your post...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,331 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2522
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
     
Jul 01, 2008 19:48 |  #2

Not neccessarily.

The reciprocal x crop factor rule is just a starting point and as such would vary with the focal length at which you are shooting. However, since it is so easy to increase the focal length (zoom in) with a zoom lens, it might be safer to use a shutter speed which is the reciprocal of the longest focal length x crop factor.

This rule of thumb has many-many variables, including your physical condition (both health and tempory condition from running, etc,), your technical ability to hold a camera steady (breathing, gentle shutter release, etc.), your environment (wind, etc.), the weight and size of your lens and camera and many more. It can also be impacted by the adrenaline running through your body during exciting moments and the amount of caffine, nicotine or alcohol you consume.

I have found that this rule holds pretty true for me in the shorter focal lengths (100mm and under) but, when using long focal length lenses, I need to increase the shutter speed beyond the reciprocal of focal length x crop factor. That is why I really like IS equipped lenses in long focal lengths.

As an example, I can hand-hold my 70-200mm f/4L IS lens at 1/60 second and be assured of almost 100% sharp imagery when the IS is turned on and I am at 200mm. There is no way I could come close to this without IS. In fact, because of IS, I use the 70-200mm f/4L IS lens 3-4x more often than I ever used the non-IS version of that lens.


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Jul 01, 2008 20:04 |  #3

midnight_rider wrote in post #5830396 (external link)
I have searched but came back empty handed. I have a question about the ss vs camera shake. I know that you are supposed to use the reciprocal of your focal length to reduce shake and include the crop factor. But is that because the lens length changes. I have a 70-200 and it is a non extending zoom so does that mean that I have to shoot at or above 1/320 at all times?

The 1/focal length rule-of-thumb has been accepted over many decades for the 35mm film format. If you are applying the rule-of-thumb to an APS-C format DSLR, you need to multiply the actual focal length you are using at the moment by the "crop factor". For example, if your 70-200 is dialed in at 120mm then you should start with 1/192 second (or faster) shutter speed [1/(120 x 1.6)].

As said above, a rule-of-thumb is for average people with average conditions in average situations. You may very well find that you can get away with much slower shutter speeds because you have trained yourself to act like a rock when holding a camera. On the other hand, you may need to double the results of the calculation to be even close to having your images looking like the camera was held steady.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,486 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4580
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jul 01, 2008 21:20 |  #4

And the rule is based not upon the absolute focal length, but by the angle of view seen by the lens...so that a certain percentage of the angle of view is what determines the real limit of the ability to hand hold at a certain speed. The fraction of the total frame height is constant, so shaking a hypothetical 1/100 of the frame height would hold true for a 20mm lens as it would for a 200mm lens.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

554 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Question about camera shake
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2721 guests, 151 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.