S.Horton I'm having size issues, does this get worse with age?  More info | Feb 06, 2008 21:30 | #1 I need to get long. Sam - TF Says Ishmael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
liquidstone insane Bird photographer  1,088 posts Likes: 95 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Feb 06, 2008 22:30 | #2 hortonsl62 wrote in post #4867319  I need to get long. Very long. So, I'm curious what 500MM f/4 shots using 2X extenders really look like, as it appears the 500 is about the right weight to realistically use for wildlife and BIF work. And, I'm curious about the comparison of 300 f/2.8 IS L + 2X + 1.4X. Wow.... my kind of thread..... glad to oblige.  500 f4 + Canon 1.4x + Tamron 1.4x  Romy Romy Ocon, Philippine Wild Birds
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sickness Senior Member 333 posts Joined May 2007 Location: Kalamazoo, MI More info | Feb 06, 2008 22:40 | #3 This is the kind of photography I cannot afford...hah. Canon 20D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
danpass Goldmember  2,134 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Miami, FL More info | Feb 06, 2008 22:53 | #4
Dan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 07, 2008 06:13 | #5 ^^ Great shots you posted and, yeah, sure, astro photogs (who are clearly more crazy than 'us', LOL) cheat, because they're long and wide. Sam - TF Says Ishmael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 10, 2008 01:03 | #6 Here are a few of my 800+mm shots. Shot jpeg, cropped and resized with Irfanview:  2 20d w/FD500 f4.5L + Canon 1.4x + Bower FD-EOS Converter (870mm/1400mm)  3 1dm2 w/EF500 f4LIS + Canon 2x (1000mm/1300mm)  4 20d w/EF500 f4lIS + Tamron 2x (1000mm/1600mm)  5 20d w/FD500 f4.5L + Canon 2x + Bower FD-EOS converter (1250mm/2000mm)  I know I took a few shots with the EX800 f5.6 + Tamron 1.4x on the 20D, but I can't find them right now... George - SF Bay Area- 1D, 1Dmk2, 20D, 60D, 650D, 6D, 7Dmk2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JuZ Goldmember  1,615 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jun 2005 Location: West Sussex, UK More info | Feb 10, 2008 05:50 | #7
Sigmonster + 1.4x TC JuZ
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomW Canon Fanosapien  12,743 posts Likes: 10 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee More info | Feb 10, 2008 07:38 | #8 Very nice shots, Romy. Just reading the title of the thread brought your shots to mind. You have done great work with ultra-long lenses and lens-teleconverter combinations. Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomW Canon Fanosapien 12,743 posts Likes: 10 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee More info | Feb 10, 2008 07:40 | #9 danpass wrote in post #4867835  https://photography-on-the.net …php?p=4472621&postcount=1 edit: Would he be considered cheating?  . I don't think that's cheating. It's a lens of sorts, and it's long enough! Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomW Canon Fanosapien 12,743 posts Likes: 10 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee More info | Feb 10, 2008 07:44 | #10 I guess I can throw something up here myself.  Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
liquidstone insane Bird photographer 1,088 posts Likes: 95 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Feb 10, 2008 07:55 | #11 Tom W wrote in post #4887852 I guess I can throw something up here myself. 5D, 400/2.8, 2X, and 1.4X telecons (1120 mm), 1/100 sec, f/14, ISO 200, resized down to 800 pixels across for the web: Very nice moon, Tom.... the 400 2.8 is really the 300 2.8's bigger brother! Romy Ocon, Philippine Wild Birds
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomW Canon Fanosapien 12,743 posts Likes: 10 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee More info | Feb 10, 2008 08:04 | #12 liquidstone wrote in post #4887904 Very nice moon, Tom.... the 400 2.8 is really the 300 2.8's bigger brother! Romy Thanks, Romy. The 400 is a monster, but it really is a nice lens. It also offers the only means of autofocus beyond 840 mm (600/4 & 1.4X) that is available. Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ICee Senior Member  More info | Feb 10, 2008 08:07 | #13 300 f2.8 + 2x on 40D =960
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomW Canon Fanosapien 12,743 posts Likes: 10 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee More info | Feb 10, 2008 08:45 | #15 ICee wrote in post #4887955 00 f2.8 + 2x on 40D =960 http://www.fotoframephotography.com/photo_1664914.html Can't get the picture to show any other way. Which "00 f/2.8" is that? 300/2.8? 400/2.8? Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is aperture20 814 guests, 372 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017 | |||
