Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 06 Jan 2005 (Thursday) 06:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Quick Release Plate Systems

 
psychonaut
Member
93 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Jan 06, 2005 06:44 |  #1

Manfrotto Rapid Connect 0, Rapid Connect 2 and Rapid Connect 4 ... what is the difference ? the ball head i am looking at ( 488 ) comes in all three. the camera to be used is Digital Rebel :(




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scottbergerphoto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
     
Jan 06, 2005 07:00 |  #2

psychonaut wrote:
Manfrotto Rapid Connect 0, Rapid Connect 2 and Rapid Connect 4 ... what is the difference ? the ball head i am looking at ( 488 ) comes in all three. the camera to be used is Digital Rebel :(

It looks like the difference is the size and shape of the plates, prescence or abscence of spirit levels and secondary safety catches.
http://www.manfrotto.c​om …hp3?manufid=1&s​ectionid=8 (external link)
Scott


One World, One Voice Against Terror,
Best Regards,
Scott
ScottBergerPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Jan 06, 2005 07:25 |  #3

The RC4 is pretty darn big. Unless you're going to use very large lenses I would skip that. Though it won't hurt in any way, it's big and cumbersome.

If you have the choice, getting systems with spirit levels can be very nice. But you can always get a hot-shoe spirit level so that's not a necessity, either, but convenient.

From all the talk around here the RC2 seems to be the preferred favorite by far.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,909 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Jan 06, 2005 07:58 |  #4

It's true.. Manfrotto simply has FAR too many completely mutually exclusive release systems!

The advantages of the RC2 is,
1. Cost
2. Size,
3. Speed of operation (quick release ,.. really QUICK!)
4. Seems to be Manfrottos most common parts as well with the largest variety of additional options.

We just had a thread earlier this week that discussed RC2 among others.. let me see if I can dig it up ;)


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,909 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10101
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Jan 06, 2005 07:59 |  #5

Here it is;

The only Mount that can be considered "universal" is the "Arca" type.

Pioneered by "Swiss Arca" , the design has been adopted by virtually ALL of the high end Camera mounting companeis, (Wimberly, Kirk, Really Right Stuff, etc..)


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


But it's still NOT universal.. Arca will only work with other Arca plates and releases.

IMAGE: http://www.tripodhead.com/images/fb2.gif

It is up to you the owner to equip all of your bodies and lenses and tripod heads with the same system. Arca could be a good choice.. but it is pricey (approx $40.00 for a single generic lens plate!)

IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script
IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script
IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script


So.. the question would be ,. what system do you have now? (ie what tripod head with what quick replese, if any?)

For the time being it may make sense to "resist" the cal of Arca and get one of Bogen/Manfrottos far less costly systems in place.

I for instance use a combination of Bogen/Mnafrotto "RC2" (about $9.00 per plate) for everything but the really heavy long lenses (which you don't need to worry about ) where I do use Arca.

Manfrotto RC2;
IMAGE NOT FOUND
MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script

http://www.bogenimagin​g.us …?sectionid=100&​itemid=315 (external link)
At &H (external link)

Arca info;
Arca at B&H (external link)

Arca Stuff at Really Right Stuff (external link)
http://www.reallyright​stuff.com/index.html (external link)

Kirk Photo Stuff (external link)

GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Jan 06, 2005 08:07 |  #6

Does the RC2 have a "safety" catch? My RC4 has a little button you have to press, so the lever won't unlock unless you hit that, too.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
psychonaut
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
93 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Jan 06, 2005 08:23 |  #7

wow that was quick, thanx :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HJMinard
Goldmember
Avatar
2,319 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Port Huron, Michigan, U.S.A.
     
Jan 06, 2005 09:13 as a reply to  @ Scottes's post |  #8

Scottes wrote:
Does the RC2 have a "safety" catch? My RC4 has a little button you have to press, so the lever won't unlock unless you hit that, too.

Yes, Scottes, it does. The RC2 system has a tiny brass(?) lever that serves as a safety.


~ Jay ~
Canon EOS 20D ... lenses and stuff
Without the Way, there is no going; Without the Truth, there is no knowing; Without the Life, there is no living. <><
Help remove children from poverty: Compassion (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
psychonaut
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
93 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Jan 06, 2005 15:39 |  #9

u know i looked at the listing for the plates and it doesnt seem like RC2 has many more optional plates than RC0 ...

and the 488RC0 head has dual spirit levels while 488RC2 has none

RC0 appeals more to me than RC2 ... what am i missing ?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Jan 06, 2005 16:14 |  #10

The 488RC0 is a little taller and a little heavier. The plate style is a different shape, but I have no idea of the pros or cons of either. The levels are a big plus in my opinion. The RC0 plate also looks bigger than the RC2, which could be a bit of a pain if you plan on getting more plates and leaving them on lenses and/or cameras. The bigger plate will more often get in the way or perhaps won't let the camera fit in a bag so well.

But I don't think you'd be going wrong with the 488RC0, IMHO.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
psychonaut
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
93 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Jan 07, 2005 07:14 |  #11

a question. 488RC0 head versus 488 head and a separate RC0 adapter.

separately works out to 45 dollars more but will allow to change quick release system independently of head, correct ?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Jan 07, 2005 07:35 |  #12

Waste of money. Both ways get you exactly the same thing but one's more expensive.

Get the 488RC0 head, and if you decide - IF - that you don't like RC0 then get a seperate RC2 adapter. The separate adapters only make sense if you want to *change* your system. You should really try to stick with one system unless you have a good reason, as this means you can buy just the plates and leave them stuck on lenses and cameras and never have to remove them, regardless of whether you're using your ball-head or pan/tilt or monopod. Granted you don't have them all now, but you might someday. In a year I've collected a ball-head, a pan-tilt, and two monopods. It's real nice to have the same QR system on all of them.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
psychonaut
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
93 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Jan 08, 2005 06:20 |  #13

ok now i am confused.

how does RC0 adapter attach to the 488 head, does it go straight on top of the round stationary "plate" or does that round stationary plate get removed first ?

what if i was trying to put that RC0 adapter on a head that already has a QR system like 488RC2 ... then i would have to remove the RC0 and ... what kind of connfection would that expose ? would it be compatible with that RC2 adapter that has to go on it ?

:shock:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Jan 08, 2005 07:07 |  #14

A QR system has 2 pieces - the plate which attaches to the camera, and the base. There's a threaded hole is the base which will screw onto a tripod head. Take a ball-head: the "ball" has the ball and the "arm" which is attached to the ball. At the end of the arm is a screw which screws into a QR base. So you unscrew your old QR base, screw on the new QR base, and bingo - you have the same head with a new QR system.

I'm still not sure which head you want, but from the sounds of things the RC2 QR system is probably the best for you (in the Manfrotto line and/or at this price level).


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
psychonaut
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
93 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
Jan 09, 2005 08:18 as a reply to  @ Scottes's post |  #15

thanx, i will double check in the store though to be sure.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

15,167 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Quick Release Plate Systems
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1187 guests, 114 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.