Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 02 Jul 2008 (Wednesday) 14:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Determining DOF

 
sandpiper
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,171 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 53
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Merseyside, England
     
Jul 03, 2008 17:34 |  #16

Glenn NK wrote in post #5844038 (external link)
From what I've read, this relationship is good until you get to macro distances, then it falls apart (where it's more 50/50).

Yeah, I believe so. However DoF is so shallow with macro anyway that you need to focus exactly on the point you need sharp anyway. I shoot a lot of preying mantids and have to focus on the eye and just let Dof fall where it may. Focusing even slightly behind the eyes, to put more of the DoF over the body, makes the shot look soft as the eyes aren't pin sharp. In fact it's not always possible to get both eyes sharp, even though they are only 2-3 mm apart.

With macro work, the only way I attempt to judge DoF is with the DoF preview button, which actually seems more effective in macro situations than normal shooting. I will sometimes focus slightly away from the critical focus point, if the DoF preview shows it will be OK, but I would never attempt to use any 33/67 or 50/50 ratio to guesstimate the best point to focus at with macro.

As the OP was asking about controlling DoF in shots of a model sitting on a car, I figure the difference for macro isn't important to them. You raise a good point though.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Glenn ­ NK
Goldmember
Avatar
4,630 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Victoria, BC
     
Jul 03, 2008 19:31 |  #17

sandpiper wrote in post #5844147 (external link)
Yeah, I believe so. However DoF is so shallow with macro anyway that you need to focus exactly on the point you need sharp anyway. I shoot a lot of preying mantids and have to focus on the eye and just let Dof fall where it may. Focusing even slightly behind the eyes, to put more of the DoF over the body, makes the shot look soft as the eyes aren't pin sharp. In fact it's not always possible to get both eyes sharp, even though they are only 2-3 mm apart.

With macro work, the only way I attempt to judge DoF is with the DoF preview button, which actually seems more effective in macro situations than normal shooting. I will sometimes focus slightly away from the critical focus point, if the DoF preview shows it will be OK, but I would never attempt to use any 33/67 or 50/50 ratio to guesstimate the best point to focus at with macro.

As the OP was asking about controlling DoF in shots of a model sitting on a car, I figure the difference for macro isn't important to them. You raise a good point though.

I have given up on small apertures for closeup/macro work, and now resort to focus stacking. Typically I shoot at f/4 to f/5.6 (which eliminates any crappy backgrounds) and take anywhere from four to twelve shots.

Of course, this can be used for landscapes as well provided that wind doesn't move things around between shots. I wouldn't try stacking with live people though.


When did voluptuous become voluminous?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,965 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Determining DOF
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2700 guests, 149 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.