Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 03 Jul 2008 (Thursday) 01:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Noise vs. viewing software

 
eelnoraa
Goldmember
1,798 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2007
     
Jul 03, 2008 01:07 |  #1

I have been using ARC for a long time. Today, for fun, I downloaded DPP 3.4.1 to see how it performs. I saw a lot more noise, hot pixels, with DPP which I was not able to see in ARC or Lightroom. It seems like ARC and Lightroom did some noise reduction to the RAW, well at least all hot pixels are removed. Does anyone have this experiecen before?

eel


5Di, 5Diii, 28, 50, 85, 16-35II, 24-105, 70-200F2.8 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
penagate
Senior Member
Avatar
389 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Sunny Adelaide
     
Jul 03, 2008 02:26 |  #2

As far as I know both ACR and Lightroom apply a default NR profile for the camera model. Also as far as I know, this can be disabled in both applications.


5D, 400D
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Jul 03, 2008 03:55 |  #3

I've noticed before that ACR does some hot pixel mapping, and DPP doesn't.

ACR NR is set *way* too high by default IMO.


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eelnoraa
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,798 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2007
     
Jul 03, 2008 13:43 as a reply to  @ René Damkot's post |  #4

Another related question. Even without any NR, should we see hot pixel at ISO800 and ISO1600 at all? This is for 5D and 30D

eel


5Di, 5Diii, 28, 50, 85, 16-35II, 24-105, 70-200F2.8 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bacchanal
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,284 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
     
Jul 03, 2008 13:49 |  #5

eelnoraa wrote in post #5842904 (external link)
Another related question. Even without any NR, should we see hot pixel at ISO800 and ISO1600 at all? This is for 5D and 30D

eel

ISO 800 is a little low, but it certainly isn't uncommon. Try putting your camera into sensor cleaning mode for a few seconds, and the camera may just map out the hot pixels for you.


Drew A. | gear | photosexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eelnoraa
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,798 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2007
     
Jul 03, 2008 14:07 as a reply to  @ bacchanal's post |  #6

Thanks for the suggestion. I will try them tonight


5Di, 5Diii, 28, 50, 85, 16-35II, 24-105, 70-200F2.8 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,186 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Noise vs. viewing software
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1367 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.