If you have multiple flashes targeting the same spot and close to the subject (i.e. just out of the frame), then it's very possible to keep up with the sun using flashes.
form "inadequately equipped" 4,929 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Henderson, NV More info | Jul 05, 2008 10:17 | #16 If you have multiple flashes targeting the same spot and close to the subject (i.e. just out of the frame), then it's very possible to keep up with the sun using flashes. Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Jul 05, 2008 11:41 | #17 Jam71868 wrote in post #5852620 sfaust... and everyone else.... I love this photo and others like it.... can someone tell me, in simple terms, how this photo was achieved? Is it possible to overpower the sun using 580's or do you have to have something more powerful? Let us imagine the ISO is 100, and in this situation the normal exposure (according to the Sunny 16 rule) is 1/100 f/16. So in order to make it easier on your flash output, you open the aperture to f/11 and use 1/200 shutter speed to compensate the larger aperture. (Let's also assume your camera has 1/200 max X-sync speed.). Now turn on the flash, put it into ETTL mode, then shoot. That is all there is to it! You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Catlover Senior Member 262 posts Joined Oct 2007 More info | Jul 05, 2008 13:11 | #18 Jam71868 wrote in post #5852620 sfaust... and everyone else.... I love this photo and others like it.... can someone tell me, in simple terms, how this photo was achieved? Is it possible to overpower the sun using 580's or do you have to have something more powerful? It really depends on the time of day, during extremely bright backlit conditions the 580 is not going to cut it. Here are some examples where you could use it and others where it would have been impossible.
Qflash (150 watt seconds) full power, fired with reflector in place, very bright sun. As you can see, it barely matched the ambient light.
580EX full power in a Westcott 28" softbox, the sky isn't blue but it kept the sun at bay....
Regards,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jam71868 Senior Member 536 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 More info | Very Nice!!! Gear:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sfaust Goldmember 2,306 posts Likes: 10 Joined Nov 2006 More info | Jul 05, 2008 14:56 | #20 Jam71868 wrote in post #5852620 sfaust ...I love this photo and others like it.... can someone tell me, in simple terms, how this photo was achieved? Since I shot it, I think so Stephen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jrsforums Goldmember 1,249 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Cary (Raleigh), NC, USA More info | Jul 06, 2008 08:56 | #21 Wilt wrote in post #5853675 Let us imagine the ISO is 100, and in this situation the normal exposure (according to the Sunny 16 rule) is 1/100 f/16. So in order to make it easier on your flash output, you open the aperture to f/11 and use 1/200 shutter speed to compensate the larger aperture. (Let's also assume your camera has 1/200 max X-sync speed.). Now turn on the flash, put it into ETTL mode, then shoot. That is all there is to it! Your 580 has a guide number of about 150 or so, at 50mm FL coverage (30mm AOV on APS-C camera), which means at f/11 it can reach out to about 13.5'. Beyone that distance it is less intense than the ambient sun light. That isn't a disadvange...if shooting 1/200 f/11 and the distance of subject is 19' away, flash is -1EV in intensity compared to the sun. So at that setting, the example photo that you like would actually appear to be less artificial, because we would expect the shadow side of the subject to the less intense (the sun is at her back, after all). So to achieve that less intense light while in ETTL, you dial in a -nEV setting on FEC. Wilt....good calculations....'cept he used an umbrella....lose 3 stops of 580 power (do not pass Go, do not collect $200).... John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Jul 06, 2008 09:19 | #22 jrsforums wrote in post #5858353 Wilt....good calculations....'cept he used an umbrella....lose 3 stops of 580 power (do not pass Go, do not collect $200).... Outside, with all the "softening" light floating around, he could probably get by with direct flash...just being careful (via FEC) to not over power the subject. While the OP shot the flash into an umbrella, the later example by sfaust did not mention the umbrella, and I was responding to a post from a thread reader who wanted to know how to replicate that result. You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 07, 2008 03:09 | #23 Thanks for the blog, I have someone to test it on today if the weather allows, and this time No turned off strobe Beauty is in the eye of the Beholder.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
scotch Goldmember 1,516 posts Joined Oct 2007 More info | Jul 07, 2008 03:25 | #24 Cordial wishes of best of luck! It's daunting the first time you balance available, flash, ISO, aperture and SS to get the desired result...It can be likened to balancing a basketball on a needle
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2532 guests, 157 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||