Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 04 Jul 2008 (Friday) 14:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Blue Sky Vs White sky

 
form
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
Jul 05, 2008 10:17 |  #16

If you have multiple flashes targeting the same spot and close to the subject (i.e. just out of the frame), then it's very possible to keep up with the sun using flashes.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,485 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4579
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jul 05, 2008 11:41 |  #17

Jam71868 wrote in post #5852620 (external link)
sfaust... and everyone else....
I love this photo and others like it.... can someone tell me, in simple terms, how this photo was achieved? Is it possible to overpower the sun using 580's or do you have to have something more powerful?

Let us imagine the ISO is 100, and in this situation the normal exposure (according to the Sunny 16 rule) is 1/100 f/16. So in order to make it easier on your flash output, you open the aperture to f/11 and use 1/200 shutter speed to compensate the larger aperture. (Let's also assume your camera has 1/200 max X-sync speed.). Now turn on the flash, put it into ETTL mode, then shoot. That is all there is to it!

Your 580 has a guide number of about 150 or so, at 50mm FL coverage (30mm AOV on APS-C camera), which means at f/11 it can reach out to about 13.5'. Beyone that distance it is less intense than the ambient sun light. That isn't a disadvange...if shooting 1/200 f/11 and the distance of subject is 19' away, flash is -1EV in intensity compared to the sun. So at that setting, the example photo that you like would actually appear to be less artificial, because we would expect the shadow side of the subject to the less intense (the sun is at her back, after all). So to achieve that less intense light while in ETTL, you dial in a -nEV setting on FEC.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Catlover
Senior Member
Avatar
262 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
Jul 05, 2008 13:11 |  #18

Jam71868 wrote in post #5852620 (external link)
sfaust... and everyone else....
I love this photo and others like it.... can someone tell me, in simple terms, how this photo was achieved? Is it possible to overpower the sun using 580's or do you have to have something more powerful?

It really depends on the time of day, during extremely bright backlit conditions the 580 is not going to cut it. Here are some examples where you could use it and others where it would have been impossible.


580EX II full power into a Westcott 45" Halo, near sunset...

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'



Qflash (150 watt seconds) full power, fired with reflector in place, very bright sun. As you can see, it barely matched the ambient light.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'



580EX full power in a Westcott 28" softbox, the sky isn't blue but it kept the sun at bay....

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'

Regards,
Todd
www.toddbaughphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jam71868
Senior Member
Avatar
536 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 05, 2008 14:19 as a reply to  @ Catlover's post |  #19

Very Nice!!!

Thank you to all who took the time to answer my questions and post results.


Gear:
Canon 5d MKII, Canon 40d, Canon 30d, Canon XTi
Canon 24-105 f4 L IS, 70-200 2.8 L, 85 1.8, 50 1.8, Tamron 28-75 2.8
(2) Canon 580 EXII Flash
(2) Alien Bee 800's

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sfaust
Goldmember
Avatar
2,306 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2006
     
Jul 05, 2008 14:56 |  #20

Jam71868 wrote in post #5852620 (external link)
sfaust ...I love this photo and others like it.... can someone tell me, in simple terms, how this photo was achieved?

Since I shot it, I think so ;) I started to add a post here on the details, then decided it would be too long. So I created a detailed 'How to' on my blog, and here is the link for those interested. There is a series of images that show the effect being built up, as well as a number of example images with details on the lighting at the end.

http://stephenfaust.wo​rdpress.com …robe-and-sunlight-how-to/ (external link)

In many cases, a 580EX will have enough power. But not in direct sunlight. Although, since you said 580's, if you have more than one you can double them up to increase the power as needed. Two 580's strapped together and aimed at the same spot will give you an extra stop of power. Another two more (4 total), will increase it another stop as well. Not really practical, but in a pinch two 580's might make the difference of getting the effect or not.

The best bet will be to try this effect in the early morning or late afternoon hours when the sun is less intense. Even better is to use open shade, overcast skies, or that time when the sun is just below the horizon.


Stephen

Mix of digital still gear, Medium format to M4/3.
Canon EOS Cinema for video.
Commercial Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jrsforums
Goldmember
1,249 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Cary (Raleigh), NC, USA
     
Jul 06, 2008 08:56 |  #21

Wilt wrote in post #5853675 (external link)
Let us imagine the ISO is 100, and in this situation the normal exposure (according to the Sunny 16 rule) is 1/100 f/16. So in order to make it easier on your flash output, you open the aperture to f/11 and use 1/200 shutter speed to compensate the larger aperture. (Let's also assume your camera has 1/200 max X-sync speed.). Now turn on the flash, put it into ETTL mode, then shoot. That is all there is to it!

Your 580 has a guide number of about 150 or so, at 50mm FL coverage (30mm AOV on APS-C camera), which means at f/11 it can reach out to about 13.5'. Beyone that distance it is less intense than the ambient sun light. That isn't a disadvange...if shooting 1/200 f/11 and the distance of subject is 19' away, flash is -1EV in intensity compared to the sun. So at that setting, the example photo that you like would actually appear to be less artificial, because we would expect the shadow side of the subject to the less intense (the sun is at her back, after all). So to achieve that less intense light while in ETTL, you dial in a -nEV setting on FEC.

Wilt....good calculations....'cept he used an umbrella....lose 3 stops of 580 power (do not pass Go, do not collect $200)....

Outside, with all the "softening" light floating around, he could probably get by with direct flash...just being careful (via FEC) to not over power the subject.


John

Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,485 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4579
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jul 06, 2008 09:19 |  #22

jrsforums wrote in post #5858353 (external link)
Wilt....good calculations....'cept he used an umbrella....lose 3 stops of 580 power (do not pass Go, do not collect $200)....

Outside, with all the "softening" light floating around, he could probably get by with direct flash...just being careful (via FEC) to not over power the subject.

While the OP shot the flash into an umbrella, the later example by sfaust did not mention the umbrella, and I was responding to a post from a thread reader who wanted to know how to replicate that result.

Nevertheless, you are right in your statement about a white reflective umbrella losing -3EV compared to direct flash


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CMax
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
107 posts
Joined Mar 2008
     
Jul 07, 2008 03:09 |  #23

Thanks for the blog, I have someone to test it on today if the weather allows, and this time No turned off strobe


Beauty is in the eye of the Beholder.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scotch
Goldmember
1,516 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
Jul 07, 2008 03:25 |  #24

Cordial wishes of best of luck! It's daunting the first time you balance available, flash, ISO, aperture and SS to get the desired result...It can be likened to balancing a basketball on a needle




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,649 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
Blue Sky Vs White sky
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2532 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.