Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 05 Jul 2008 (Saturday) 00:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2GB to 3GB RAM - much of a difference?

 
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jul 05, 2008 00:44 |  #1

Just wondering....if I swapped out a 1GB stick in my laptop for a 2GB to give me 3GB in all (the most XP Professional 32 bit will recognize AFAIK), would I see much improvement to warrant it? I'm currently running a 2.16GHz Core2Duo laptop w/ 2GB RAM @ 667MHz. LR 1.4 and PS7 are my two primary tools.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheHoff
Don't Hassle....
Avatar
8,804 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jul 05, 2008 01:09 |  #2

I say yes. Especially keeping them both open at the same time, I felt good difference going from 2 to 3.3 (4 total, but still on Vista 32). And it is so cheap now, too.


••Vancouver Wedding Photographer  (external link)••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jul 05, 2008 01:10 |  #3

That was my next question...should I just spring for 2 2GB sticks even though I'm only on a 32 bit system? Would I have glitches or would the only downside be that not all 4GB is recognized?


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scokar
Goldmember
Avatar
1,080 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
     
Jul 05, 2008 01:11 |  #4

turn on your task manager and monitor the ram usage as you do your average workflow. that will tell you if you need more memory.

however, sometimes memory has to be installed in pairs -- depends on your motherboard. this info is in your manual or online at the manufacturers site.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
blinded
Senior Member
298 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jul 05, 2008 02:08 |  #5

You guys make me feel ghetto. I still only have 512. Personally, I can't imagine 2gigs. That's like too much! And then I hear about 4-8gb... OVERKILL!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Jul 05, 2008 02:26 |  #6

cdifoto wrote in post #5851662 (external link)
Just wondering....if I swapped out a 1GB stick in my laptop for a 2GB to give me 3GB would I see much improvement to warrant it? I'm currently running a 2.16GHz Core2Duo laptop w/ 2GB RAM @ 667MHz.

If you have a GMA video chipset you'll lose the benefit of matched dual-channel memory.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jul 05, 2008 02:49 |  #7

Tony-S wrote in post #5851947 (external link)
If you have a GMA video chipset you'll lose the benefit of matched dual-channel memory.

Well I've got an NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M video card in my laptop. It's 512MB with 256 shared. Not sure if that's considered GMA or not because I'm hardware-retarded.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
orisky
Goldmember
Avatar
1,398 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2007
Location: the oc
     
Jul 05, 2008 03:55 |  #8

blinded wrote in post #5851905 (external link)
You guys make me feel ghetto. I still only have 512. Personally, I can't imagine 2gigs. That's like too much! And then I hear about 4-8gb... OVERKILL!

how are you even able to start and OS, open a browser and make a post?  :p




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 05, 2008 05:21 |  #9

orisky wrote in post #5852155 (external link)
how are you even able to start and OS, open a browser and make a post?  :p

Slowly!


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jul 05, 2008 05:34 |  #10

blinded wrote in post #5851905 (external link)
You guys make me feel ghetto. I still only have 512. Personally, I can't imagine 2gigs. That's like too much! And then I hear about 4-8gb... OVERKILL!

No such thing as overkill when you have 900+ images to work on and time is money. :mad:


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 05, 2008 06:58 |  #11

I can't imaging 2GB-3GB will make a lot of difference, but memory's cheap. Personally I have a dual core PC with 2GB of RAM, at the end of the year or next year i'll upgrade to 8 core and 4-8GB of RAM. With the number of weddings I have booked it should save me a fairly large amount of time.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheHoff
Don't Hassle....
Avatar
8,804 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jul 05, 2008 07:00 |  #12

It is 50% more memory... how is that not significant? Assuming Vista is eating at least half a gig, he is running with 1.5 free now... so going to 3, under the hood, will mean 100% more free RAM to work with.


edit: oh yea, and as said above, I'd go to 4 even if you won't see it all now. It is always preferable to have matched pairs.


••Vancouver Wedding Photographer  (external link)••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 05, 2008 07:22 |  #13

cdifoto wrote in post #5851662 (external link)
(the most XP Professional 32 bit will recognize AFAIK)

TheHoff wrote in post #5852517 (external link)
It is 50% more memory... how is that not significant? Assuming Vista is eating at least half a gig, he is running with 1.5 free now... so going to 3, under the hood, will mean 100% more free RAM to work with.

How do you figure Vista's taking up half a gig when he's running XP? :p


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheHoff
Don't Hassle....
Avatar
8,804 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jul 05, 2008 07:32 |  #14

tim wrote in post #5852563 (external link)
How do you figure Vista's taking up half a gig when he's running XP? :p

Even when you're not running Vista, it is still eating unnecessary resources remotely.

:D


••Vancouver Wedding Photographer  (external link)••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Jul 05, 2008 07:50 |  #15

I think any you should leave well enough alone. 2 gb seems to be the "sweet spot" for a system like yours (and mine). Also, I subscribe to the belief that most systems are happiest with matched sticks of memory, not different size, different brands, etc. I spec the PCs in the marketing/graphics department of the company I work for and they all run on 2 x 1gb or 4 x 500mb matched memory. I get most of my system recommendations from two old friends, both IT managers for large corporations.

So don't fix what ain't broke and apply the money you would have spent to your next computer.


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,348 views & 0 likes for this thread, 21 members have posted to it.
2GB to 3GB RAM - much of a difference?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1613 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.