Comparing the 30D, 40D and XSi, which has the best ISO performance at 800 and 1600?
Thanks!
Jim
JimHoltz Senior Member 452 posts Joined Apr 2008 Location: Des Moines, Iowa More info | Jul 05, 2008 09:41 | #1 Comparing the 30D, 40D and XSi, which has the best ISO performance at 800 and 1600?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PAFC2004 Goldmember 1,084 posts Joined Mar 2006 Location: Adelaide, Australia More info | Jul 05, 2008 09:41 | #2 |
Jul 05, 2008 09:44 | #3 PAFC2004 wrote in post #5853079 There are many threads on this. 40D. Actually, I've searched and read all the reviews and I've yet to find a definitive answer. Seems everyone thinks what they have is the best. I have an XTi and I'd like better high ISO performance.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sadowsk2 Goldmember 1,179 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: Macomb, MI More info | 30D. 1D Mk IV, 5D Gripped, 30D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 05, 2008 10:27 | #6 I've used 2 of the 3 cameras mentioned (30D/40D), and don't really see much high-ISO noise difference between them at the pixel level. I can't imagine the XSi will be much different. I also doubt any of them will be significantly different than your XTi. One benefit of the higher megapixel cameras in the group is that you will be compressing a bit more for similar print sizes when you crop, which will compress the noise a bit to give the appearance of less noise. With the 40D (or 30D), you'll have ISO3200 available in the camera, instead of having to underexpose a stop and push in post with the XSi. John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ps249 Senior Member 420 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: Last seen in Saginaw, Michigan USA More info | Jul 05, 2008 11:04 | #7 Permanent banI owned both the 30D and 40D. My verdict: 40D hands down! 40D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edmaine Mostly Lurking 10 posts Joined May 2008 More info | Jul 05, 2008 11:10 | #8 i dont have 30d or xsi, but i have xti and 40d, 40d hands down.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
form "inadequately equipped" 4,929 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Henderson, NV More info | Jul 05, 2008 11:29 | #9 The 30D produces slightly less overall noise at similar outputs, but the 40D has a very good chroma noise reduction option that costs nothing in image quality and beats the 30D's chroma noise by a fair margin. The expense of that noise reduction function is reduced buffer size. Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Excellent feedback! Here are a couple of 100% crops, resized for posting of course, that will hopefully show why I posted the question. I shot a lot of snapshots at a family reunion yesterday with my XTi. I had it set at 400 ISO using AV mode Full sun photos were good but many shot in the shade showed visible noise. I didn't think I'd have any noise issues at 400 with the XTi. Both cleaned up nicely with Noiseware but I'd prefer not to have to clean at this low of ISO setting.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canotographer Senior Member 810 posts Joined May 2007 More info | Jul 05, 2008 11:33 | #11 40D Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
form "inadequately equipped" 4,929 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Henderson, NV More info | Jul 05, 2008 11:43 | #12 Noise is always more visible in shadows. Increase your exposure by shooting to the right (+exposure compensation) and you will see less noise. Use RAW and you can even get away with slightly blowing out areas without losing the detail, if you know how to use photo editing apps at all. Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Permagrin High Priestess of all I survey 77,915 posts Likes: 21 Joined Aug 2006 Location: day dreamin' More info | ps249 wrote in post #5853496 I owned both the 30D and 40D. My verdict: 40D hands down! I agree. I've owned both. As was mentioned the 30D's chroma noise is the issue. Shots in the same circumstances, the 30D's will be much harder to "fix" due to the chroma noise. The 40D controls that quite well. There's just no comparison. I also have a M3 which is great at dealing with noise and I'd put the 40D closer to it and the 5D (which I used to own and am quite fond of) than the 30D (it ranks on the bottom for me and I owned 2). .. It's Permie's world, we just live in it! ~CDS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 05, 2008 12:22 | #15 form wrote in post #5853690 Noise is always more visible in shadows. Increase your exposure by shooting to the right (+exposure compensation) and you will see less noise. Use RAW and you can even get away with slightly blowing out areas without losing the detail, if you know how to use photo editing apps at all. http://the-digital-picture.com …al-SLR-Camera-Review.aspx Actually, I did shoot in RAW, converted to TIFF with slight sharpening and a light boost in contrast and saturation during conversion. I did the 100% crop from the TIFF image and saved it as a JPG.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 926 guests, 179 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||