Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 05 Jul 2008 (Saturday) 09:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best high ISO performance?

 
Jim ­ Holtz
Senior Member
Avatar
452 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
     
Jul 05, 2008 09:41 |  #1

Comparing the 30D, 40D and XSi, which has the best ISO performance at 800 and 1600?

Thanks!

Jim




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PAFC2004
Goldmember
Avatar
1,084 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Adelaide, Australia
     
Jul 05, 2008 09:41 |  #2

There are many threads on this. 40D.


Canon 5D MKii |Canon 350D | EF 17-40L | EF 70-200 2.8L | 580EX II | 430EX | EF 1.4x T/C II | EF 50 1.8II | Q6600 + 8800 Ultra

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim ­ Holtz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
452 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
     
Jul 05, 2008 09:44 |  #3

PAFC2004 wrote in post #5853079 (external link)
There are many threads on this. 40D.

Actually, I've searched and read all the reviews and I've yet to find a definitive answer. Seems everyone thinks what they have is the best. I have an XTi and I'd like better high ISO performance.

Jim




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SOT
I make up stuff about Cameras
915 posts
Joined Oct 2007
     
Jul 05, 2008 09:44 |  #4

40D


http://img81.imageshac​k.us/img81/8646/captur​e1o.jpg (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sadowsk2
Goldmember
Avatar
1,179 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Macomb, MI
     
Jul 05, 2008 10:26 as a reply to  @ SOT's post |  #5

30D.


1D Mk IV, 5D Gripped, 30D
35L | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L |16-35L | 24-70L |[COLOR=black] 24-105L | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 100-400L | 15mm fisheye | 580EX II x2 | 430EX

Canon S3IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
prime80
Goldmember
Avatar
2,394 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 83
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Harmony, FL
     
Jul 05, 2008 10:27 |  #6

I've used 2 of the 3 cameras mentioned (30D/40D), and don't really see much high-ISO noise difference between them at the pixel level. I can't imagine the XSi will be much different. I also doubt any of them will be significantly different than your XTi. One benefit of the higher megapixel cameras in the group is that you will be compressing a bit more for similar print sizes when you crop, which will compress the noise a bit to give the appearance of less noise. With the 40D (or 30D), you'll have ISO3200 available in the camera, instead of having to underexpose a stop and push in post with the XSi.

IMO, if you want to see a drastic high-ISO noise improvement, you'll have to move to the 5D or 1DMkIII. That being said, I routinely shot my 40D at ISO3200 for night games with acceptable results. The shots required noise reduction in post, and fine detail is pretty much obliterated, but you can get acceptable 4x6 and 5x7 prints out of it.

You can also look at the reviews on dpreview.com and check his noise graphs.


John
R6, EF 100-400 L IS II, EF 24-70 L II, EF 85 f/1.8
Full Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ps249
Senior Member
Avatar
420 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Last seen in Saginaw, Michigan USA
     
Jul 05, 2008 11:04 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

I owned both the 30D and 40D. My verdict: 40D hands down!


40D
50 f/1.8 | 28-135 IS |
MAUREEN SOUZA FOR PRESIDENT!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
edmaine
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined May 2008
     
Jul 05, 2008 11:10 |  #8

i dont have 30d or xsi, but i have xti and 40d, 40d hands down.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
Jul 05, 2008 11:29 |  #9

The 30D produces slightly less overall noise at similar outputs, but the 40D has a very good chroma noise reduction option that costs nothing in image quality and beats the 30D's chroma noise by a fair margin. The expense of that noise reduction function is reduced buffer size.

the 20D and 30D have the very same noise output and sensors, and I have a 20D, so that's my reference point.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim ­ Holtz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
452 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
     
Jul 05, 2008 11:29 as a reply to  @ edmaine's post |  #10

Excellent feedback! Here are a couple of 100% crops, resized for posting of course, that will hopefully show why I posted the question. I shot a lot of snapshots at a family reunion yesterday with my XTi. I had it set at 400 ISO using AV mode Full sun photos were good but many shot in the shade showed visible noise. I didn't think I'd have any noise issues at 400 with the XTi. Both cleaned up nicely with Noiseware but I'd prefer not to have to clean at this low of ISO setting.

Anyway, I'd like to have better noise performance than this which is why I asked the question.

Thank you all for your help!

Jim


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canotographer
Senior Member
Avatar
810 posts
Joined May 2007
     
Jul 05, 2008 11:33 |  #11

40D


Mark
Camera : EOS 5D EOS 30D EOS Rebel 2000
Lens: EF70-200/2.8L IS EF100-400/4.5-5.6L IS EF 24-105/4L IS EF [COLOR=purple]17-40/4L EF-S 17-55/2.8IS [COLOR=#800080]EF 50/1.4
Accessory : 580EXII | BG-E4 | LSP| Extreme III 17GB
Crumpler: Keystone | Whickey & Cox | Barney Rustle+ Bucket

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
Jul 05, 2008 11:43 |  #12

Noise is always more visible in shadows. Increase your exposure by shooting to the right (+exposure compensation) and you will see less noise. Use RAW and you can even get away with slightly blowing out areas without losing the detail, if you know how to use photo editing apps at all.

http://the-digital-picture.com …al-SLR-Camera-Review.aspx (external link)


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Permagrin
High Priestess of all I survey
Avatar
77,915 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Aug 2006
Location: day dreamin'
     
Jul 05, 2008 11:48 as a reply to  @ form's post |  #13

ps249 wrote in post #5853496 (external link)
I owned both the 30D and 40D. My verdict: 40D hands down!

I agree. I've owned both. As was mentioned the 30D's chroma noise is the issue. Shots in the same circumstances, the 30D's will be much harder to "fix" due to the chroma noise. The 40D controls that quite well. There's just no comparison. I also have a M3 which is great at dealing with noise and I'd put the 40D closer to it and the 5D (which I used to own and am quite fond of) than the 30D (it ranks on the bottom for me and I owned 2).


.. It's Permie's world, we just live in it! ~CDS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sadatk
Goldmember
Avatar
1,392 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Atlanta
     
Jul 05, 2008 11:49 |  #14

IMAGE: http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-EOS-Digital-SLR-Noise-Comparison-G9-800.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-EOS-Digital-SLR-Noise-Comparison-XTi-800.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-EOS-Digital-SLR-Noise-Comparison-XSi-800.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-EOS-Digital-SLR-Noise-Comparison-40D-800.jpg

IMAGE: http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-EOS-Digital-SLR-Noise-Comparison-5D-800.jpg

http://www.the-digital-picture.com …al-SLR-Camera-Review.aspx (external link)



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim ­ Holtz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
452 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
     
Jul 05, 2008 12:22 |  #15

form wrote in post #5853690 (external link)
Noise is always more visible in shadows. Increase your exposure by shooting to the right (+exposure compensation) and you will see less noise. Use RAW and you can even get away with slightly blowing out areas without losing the detail, if you know how to use photo editing apps at all.

http://the-digital-picture.com …al-SLR-Camera-Review.aspx (external link)

Actually, I did shoot in RAW, converted to TIFF with slight sharpening and a light boost in contrast and saturation during conversion. I did the 100% crop from the TIFF image and saved it as a JPG.

Talk to me about shooting to the right. Would bumping the EC a 1/3 or 2/3's reduce the noise? Can this be a setting I use all the time or is a picture to picture decision?

BTW, that is an excellent comparison at the link provided. The 40D is easily the winner.

Thanks for the feedback!

Jim




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,923 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
Best high ISO performance?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
926 guests, 179 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.