I was wondering if a wireless transmitter would be a great investment for weddings... Because of the diagonal light, more natural, etc...
What do you think? Would it be a good investment?
Thank you!
FellipedePaula Senior Member 438 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Brazil More info | Jul 06, 2008 11:19 | #1 I was wondering if a wireless transmitter would be a great investment for weddings... Because of the diagonal light, more natural, etc...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bigjon0107 Senior Member 897 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Texas More info | Jul 06, 2008 13:44 | #2 Personally, i would not be able to shoot a wedding with out them. It is my studio's style to use the "light-on-a-stick" method for the dances and other important events throughout the day (cake cutting, toasts, etc..) Jon Eilts
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sevans16 Goldmember 1,005 posts Likes: 5 Joined May 2006 Location: Fresno More info | Jul 06, 2008 21:17 | #3 I don't know about setting up lights at weddings myself but in the studio: It is like a cell phone. YOu will wonder how you ever managed without one. www.777Photography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Jul 06, 2008 21:46 | #4 I use them for 2-3 lights at receptions, i'm about to upgrade from cheapies to Skyports. I don't use them in other parts of the day as ETTL works fine and is quicker than manual flash. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2532 guests, 157 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||