Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 08 Jul 2008 (Tuesday) 14:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

CANON REBEL XTI - BLURRY PICTURES ??

 
Ed ­ 718
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA U.S.A.
     
Jul 08, 2008 14:39 |  #1

I've tried everything possible to eliminate blur in my pictures with no luck. I do alot of indoor pictures at auto conventions because that is related to my job and most of those always come out blurry. If I shoot in auto the pictures come out ok but lacking in light or too much light. I have adjusted every possilbe setting on my camera but I still new to photography so what can I do. I posted some shots I took while back home in New York that came out OK but I still feel they are not sharp like I want them to be. I am running out of ideas on what to do and even thought maybe my camera was the problem. I also try to carry my tripod as much as possible but sometimes I simply can't or don't have access to it.......please someone help. :oops: :oops: :cry:

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v256/skar718/IMG_3519.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v256/skar718/IMG_3525.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v256/skar718/IMG_3523.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v256/skar718/IMG_3603.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v256/skar718/IMG_3495.jpg

"You can take the New Yorker out of NY, but you'll NEVER take NY out of the New Yorker"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ed ­ 718
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA U.S.A.
     
Jul 08, 2008 14:40 |  #2

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v256/skar718/IMG_3637.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v256/skar718/IMG_3357.jpg

"You can take the New Yorker out of NY, but you'll NEVER take NY out of the New Yorker"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sjlund
Senior Member
568 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Northern Minnesota
     
Jul 08, 2008 14:42 |  #3

Some technical details would be great. What shutter speed/aperture/ISO were you using for these? I assume these were mostly with the 10-20mm.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LuckyStar08
Senior Member
Avatar
313 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Minnesota
     
Jul 08, 2008 14:42 |  #4

Could be camera shake; an IS lens can help alot with that.


Stacy
Canon 7D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Jul 08, 2008 14:45 |  #5

What camera settings are you using? The EXIF is stripped from your posted shots so we can't see for ourselves.

Are you shooting handheld or with a tripod?

As a general rule for handheld shots, your shutter speed should be at least 1.6 X your focal length - so at 18 mm you'd need 1/30 second, at 85 mm you'd need 1/150. I try to make it 2X, myself.

What ISO are you using? Night shots like these (if handheld) are more likely to be free of camera shake if you shoot at ISO 800. Or higher.

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ed ­ 718
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA U.S.A.
     
Jul 08, 2008 14:47 |  #6

Yes most were taken with a wide angle lense. SJ I will have to get some of the histogram details for you and maybe I'm missing something.

Lucky the wide angle lense is NOT an IS so could that be it even though I sometimes do have a tripod. I guess it might be worth the extra coin for the IS lense.


"You can take the New Yorker out of NY, but you'll NEVER take NY out of the New Yorker"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ed ­ 718
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA U.S.A.
     
Jul 08, 2008 14:48 |  #7

number six wrote in post #5873590 (external link)
What camera settings are you using? The EXIF is stripped from your posted shots so we can't see for ourselves.

Are you shooting handheld or with a tripod?

As a general rule for handheld shots, your shutter speed should be at least 1.6 X your focal length - so at 18 mm you'd need 1/30 second, at 85 mm you'd need 1/150. I try to make it 2X, myself.

What ISO are you using? Night shots like these (if handheld) are more likely to be free of camera shake if you shoot at ISO 800. Or higher.

-js

Well I think I did use a low ISO setting however if I use a high ISO are my pictures subject to more noise?

Thanks for the quick replies people I greatly appreciate it.


"You can take the New Yorker out of NY, but you'll NEVER take NY out of the New Yorker"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Jul 08, 2008 14:51 |  #8

Ed 718 wrote in post #5873607 (external link)
Well I think I did use a low ISO setting however if I use a high ISO are my pictures subject to more noise?

Thanks for the quick replies people I greatly appreciate it.

Yes, there will be more noise at higher ISOs. But often the choice is between a bit of noise or a blurry picture.

You can reduce noise a great deal in post processing, but blur from camera shake can't be fixed.

Try higher ISOs and see what your pics look like for yourself...

EDIT: for the last few days I've been experimenting with ISO 3200. Noise depends very much on exposure and the type of background.

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sjlund
Senior Member
568 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Northern Minnesota
     
Jul 08, 2008 14:51 |  #9

If you were using low ISO and the 10-20, I would bet on camera shake. You need to be using a higher shutter speed, even if you have to boost up the ISO. A slightly noisy picture is WAY better than a (unintentionally) blurry picture.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonnythan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,003 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Upstate NY
     
Jul 08, 2008 14:51 |  #10

We really need exposure details to help you out. Saying "I did use a low ISO" doesn't help that much.

But, yeah, in general, if you want low-light handheld pictures, you need to crank the ISO up. It does increase noise, but also enables you to get rid of the slow shutter "blur."


T2i | 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS | 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS | 50mm f/1.8 II | 430ex
Flickr
 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rhom
Member
Avatar
92 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Jul 08, 2008 14:55 as a reply to  @ jonnythan's post |  #11

Hi,

In addition to the shutter speed and ISO, it would be useful to know the aperture (f stop) that each image was shot. Wide apertures tend not to deliver the maximum sharpness that a lens is capable of.

Best Wishes.


Rick :)
Former Nikon owner for 39 yrs, seeing the light, now!
EOS 5D, 17-40L, 24-105L IS, 70-300 IS D.O., 70-200 2.8L IS, 580EXII, Gitzo GT1550T, Adobe Lightroom, DxO Pro V.5.2, D700+ Nikkors

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ed ­ 718
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA U.S.A.
     
Jul 08, 2008 15:00 |  #12

I will supply the settings for you guys and maybe that can help.


"You can take the New Yorker out of NY, but you'll NEVER take NY out of the New Yorker"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The_Terminator
Member
Avatar
178 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Nextdoor to Sarah Connor
     
Jul 08, 2008 15:54 |  #13

I just wanted to tell you that I think your photos are beautiful.
You really captured the night of the city, and it's a pleasure to look at those photos.
Just thought I'd let you know.


I only exist for your entertainment.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ed ­ 718
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
223 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA U.S.A.
     
Jul 08, 2008 16:02 |  #14

The_Terminator wrote in post #5874012 (external link)
I just wanted to tell you that I think your photos are beautiful.
You really captured the night of the city, and it's a pleasure to look at those photos.
Just thought I'd let you know.

Thank you ;)


"You can take the New Yorker out of NY, but you'll NEVER take NY out of the New Yorker"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Jul 08, 2008 16:27 |  #15

If you shoot 10mm, forget about focusing, set it at 1 meter, or slightly past that, and shoot. If you try to focus, sometimes the camera will screw up and go to min distance or past infinity, neither of which is a good thing for blur. If you use a tripod, make sure you have the camera on self timer or with a remote release, often tripod+pressing buttons=more blur than hand holding. Oh yea, and for NYC especially, try to overexpose a bit more then bring it back in Lightroom/PS/DPP. It'll both reduce noise and let you get better shadow areas, which will be a majority of the photo anyway.


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,189 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
CANON REBEL XTI - BLURRY PICTURES ??
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is icebergchick
1154 guests, 166 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.