Hi all.
Regarding aperture f/4 on eg 70-200 lenses, is the IQ exactly the same on a EF 70-200 f/2.8 @ f/4 as a EF 70-200 f/4 @ f/4 ?
I would die for a comparition 
Dockland Member 200 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2005 Location: Sweden More info | Jul 09, 2008 05:55 | #1 Hi all.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JoYork Goldmember 3,079 posts Likes: 7 Joined Dec 2007 Location: York, England More info | Jul 09, 2008 05:58 | #2 http://www.the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=4&APIComp=2 Jo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Headshotzx Goldmember 4,488 posts Likes: 141 Joined Dec 2007 Location: Singapore More info | Jul 09, 2008 05:59 | #3 |
Thank You. That was a difference. Did not expect that to be.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Pete I was "Prime Mover" many years back.... 38,631 posts Likes: 25 Joined Jul 2006 Location: Berkshire, UK More info | Jul 09, 2008 06:01 | #5 Easy answer is no, the results will be slightly different. They've got different optics (it's not just the aperture diaphram that's different). One has 16 elements, the other 18.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jman13 Cream of the Crop 5,567 posts Likes: 164 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Columbus, OH More info | Jul 09, 2008 06:24 | #6 All 4 70-200 variants are excellent, and will produce stellar results. If you're concerned with the absolute peak sharpness and contrast, the f/4 IS is the sharpest version, even at f/4 on the f/2.8 versions. However, you'd likely not see it in most shooting. Jordan Steele - http://www.jsteelephotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
apersson850 Cream of the Crop More info | Which is logical, as it's obviously easier to make an f/4 than an f/2.8 lens. So the one that's limited to f/4 is probably better there than the one that can open up to f/2.8. Anders
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Super-Nicko Goldmember 1,652 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Perth, Western Australia More info | Jul 09, 2008 09:00 | #8 are you dead yet... My gallery - just posted some of my top shots
LOG IN TO REPLY |
20D_Newbie Senior Member 643 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Memphis, TN More info | Jul 09, 2008 09:36 | #9 I own both. The F4L IS is very sharp, one reason I am having a hard time letting go of it. However, the chart shown in the posted link is extremely misleading. The F2.8L IS looks awful compared to the F4L IS and that is just not the case, at least with mine. I will try to find a few minutes today to take a couple of shots with each. Canon EOS 7D with BG-E7 battery grip, EOS 40D with BG-E2 battery grip, Canon 20D, Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS, Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8[COLOR=#ff0000]L, EF 300mm F4L IS, EF 400mm F5.6L, EF-S 17-40mm F4.0L, Canon Speedlite 580EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyMathers I am Spartacus! 43,819 posts Likes: 2901 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom More info | Jul 09, 2008 09:43 | #10 Do I assume that, when you mouse over the image, it changes to the 'compare to' lens? If so, the f/4 is noticeably sharper.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shutterfiend Goldmember 2,058 posts Joined Feb 2007 Location: NJ More info | Jul 09, 2008 10:49 | #11 Unless I read it incorrectly, OP was looking for this https://photography-on-the.net …p=7812587&postcount=91776
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyMathers I am Spartacus! 43,819 posts Likes: 2901 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom More info | Jul 09, 2008 10:52 | #12 shutterfiend wrote in post #5879322 Unless I read it incorrectly, OP was looking for this
LOG IN TO REPLY |
20D_Newbie Senior Member 643 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Memphis, TN More info | Jul 09, 2008 11:15 | #13 Roy Mathers wrote in post #5879338 This link has already been posted twice on this thread! (and it's the one to which I was referring in my last post).Actually, all three links are different charts if you look at the lenses. The last link is in the only one with the lenses the OP asked about. Canon EOS 7D with BG-E7 battery grip, EOS 40D with BG-E2 battery grip, Canon 20D, Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS, Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8[COLOR=#ff0000]L, EF 300mm F4L IS, EF 400mm F5.6L, EF-S 17-40mm F4.0L, Canon Speedlite 580EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RoyMathers I am Spartacus! 43,819 posts Likes: 2901 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom More info | Jul 09, 2008 11:50 | #14 But surely you can pick the lens you want on any of the charts, via the drop down list, which are basically on the same page - or am I missing something?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cricketboy75 Senior Member 665 posts Joined Aug 2007 More info | Jul 09, 2008 11:52 | #15 the f/4 has better IS as far as i know. newer and more advanced.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1025 guests, 180 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||