Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 09 Jul 2008 (Wednesday) 17:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

On my own

 
cmgarcia
Senior Member
Avatar
560 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Miami FL
     
Jul 09, 2008 17:57 |  #1

I up until 3 days ago worked for a company that specialized in beach portraits. I was with them for about 6 months and learned alot. Well due to logistical changes and having kids, Im no longer working with them. When working for them i shot with a 30D,28-135 IS, and an alien bee 1600. All thats gone and im left with my XT, kit lens, and 55-200 usm. I want to start on my own but dont have a ton of many ( hardly any). What im getting to is should a flash be a first priority or a better lens. Ive seen some websites that do similar style work and use no flash at all. I dont know which should come first the chicken or the egg. Saving up money si not an option cause the season here for family beach shoots will be gone by sept. Any advice will be appreciated!!!
Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mackidbrendan
Senior Member
299 posts
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Canada
     
Jul 09, 2008 19:44 |  #2

you could get a 50 1.8 and a nikon sb-24(learn to use in manual)
those two would cost around 170-200 $
that probably your best option




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,947 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2872
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jul 09, 2008 19:50 as a reply to  @ post 5882118 |  #3

Hi CM - sorry about the job situation... that's rough.

I don't have any experience with your lenses so I'd just be speculating. However, I'm a firm believer that a properly lighted/exposed image with an ok lens can very often be better than flatly lit, crummily lighted, and improperly exposed picture done with a superior lens. In other words, it's hard to make a flattering portrait if you don't have good lighting.

Get a good flash ;). - Stu


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevindar
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,050 posts
Likes: 38
Joined May 2007
Location: california
     
Jul 09, 2008 20:07 as a reply to  @ post 5882118 |  #4

I am with sapearl out there. You will likely be shooting at f 5.6-8. any modern lens should give you decent image quality in that range. the light is much more important. Besides an ab 800 and lightstand and umbrella can be had for around 300. not much you can get in lenses which will be a great improvement for that much.


My Flickr (external link)
Gear List
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1205576

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bigjon0107
Senior Member
897 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Texas
     
Jul 09, 2008 20:19 |  #5

I would look into using a reflector. Great option for fill light and can be had anywhere from $20-$200+ . There are also some DIY sites that would show you how to make one.


Jon Eilts
Gear List
SportsShooter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sapearl
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
16,947 posts
Gallery: 243 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 2872
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jul 09, 2008 20:20 as a reply to  @ post 5882118 |  #6

The important thing about proper lighting is that it will give you more contrast, as well as more "controllable" contrast.

Many times people post images here that they feel are soft, or out of focus, or even the result of a "defective" lens that won't focus properly. And in many cases, there is nothing wrong with the gear. Their images were poorly lit.

A perfectly in focus image can often appear soft and out of focus if it lacks the proper contrast. Flat and bad illumination will cause flat and boring pictures. The images lack tonal gradation and interest. TRUST ME on this - I was an expert in producing images like that in my day :rolleyes: Now I can even spell digital :lol:.


GEAR LIST
MY WEBSITE (external link)- MY GALLERIES (external link)- MY BLOG (external link)
Artists Archives of the Western Reserve (external link) - Board

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 09, 2008 20:22 |  #7

You have 6 months experience but you don't know what you need to take the photo? You're the expert here, not us.

Personally i'd think light is most important, otherwise you're going to get a lot of blown out backgrounds. Also lens flare could be an issue, so get that next. I have no idea if a 430EX (external link) is powerful enough or if you'll need to buy a studio unit, but if a 430 won't do it a 580 probably won't either. The advantage of a 580 EX (external link) is it can take a Canon battery pack (external link), which will give you faster recharge and let you go longer between changing batteries.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 09, 2008 20:23 |  #8

bigjon0107 wrote in post #5882305 (external link)
I would look into using a reflector. Great option for fill light and can be had anywhere from $20-$200+ . There are also some DIY sites that would show you how to make one.

Reflectors blind people or at least make them squint, they're not a good solution.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cmgarcia
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
560 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Miami FL
     
Jul 09, 2008 20:35 as a reply to  @ sapearl's post |  #9

I guess what you say makes sense. I dont like to shoot on a tripod but i can get adjusted to it for now. Going from the 30D and IS lens to the small xt and kit lens makes for unsteady hands. Ill just shoot on the pod and see what kind of lighting i can afford. We used to use the Bee and a Vaghaubond ( not sure on spelling) battery pack. Although the bee was great to fill in during the bright day shoots it could be a little overwhelming for those evening sunset shoots. Any ideas on a light kit thats not as powerful and cumbersome? Would a camera mounted flash(580 ex) do the trick? I know big group shots would be triky with the ex but im trying to keep it a simple and light as possible. Walking through sand carrying camera tripod lightstands and baterry pack was pretty gruelling. Im in florida to so the heat is pretty intense this time of year. thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bigjon0107
Senior Member
897 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Texas
     
Jul 09, 2008 21:35 |  #10

tim wrote in post #5882327 (external link)
Reflectors blind people or at least make them squint, they're not a good solution.

Ya, i could see it being an issue on the beach. The only time i used them in the sun was with scrims and other diffusers to make it not as harsh or in a studio setting.


Jon Eilts
Gear List
SportsShooter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Jul 10, 2008 12:55 |  #11

tim wrote in post #5882327 (external link)
Reflectors blind people or at least make them squint, they're not a good solution.

I guess no one ever told Monte Zucker that.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 10, 2008 16:13 |  #12

amfoto1 wrote in post #5886581 (external link)
I guess no one ever told Monte Zucker that.

Every time i've tried them on a sunny day to reflect light back to a person as fill they've squinted and not liked it. What else can I say, it's just common sense really. Bright constant light into the eyes is bad. Flash is brief and less irritating to most people.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adam8080
Goldmember
Avatar
2,280 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
     
Jul 10, 2008 16:19 |  #13

Either a white reflector, or a manual flash like a SunPak 433D will do just fine, and 50 f/1.8, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2, or 135 f/2.8 for a nice lens if you can afford one.


Huntsville Real Estate Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aram535
Goldmember
Avatar
1,915 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Jul 10, 2008 17:48 as a reply to  @ adam8080's post |  #14

If the reflector is blinding your subject than your reflector is too reflective or your holding it at the wrong angle to the subject. Its for fill light so it should be very soft. Also you could move the reflector further back from the subject that should soften it up a little more, although the angle has to change too.


Gear List * www.tranquilphotos.com (external link) * My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Jul 10, 2008 17:54 |  #15

cmgarcia wrote in post #5881513 (external link)
Saving up money si not an option cause the season here for family beach shoots will be gone by sept.

If photography is your only job, then consider getting a small business loan to cover your expenses. With a $2000 loan, you should be able to afford everything you used before, and more. This would be enough to get an AB1600 with vagabond II inverter, 28-135 lens, 30d, reflectors with stand, and give you a bit left over for advertisements. This option should only be used if photography is your primary job and you know you will be able to afford the repayment plan. If photography is your primary job, you should also look into expanding outside just beach portraits, as the market segment is bound to be small and you will not be able to compete with the established business in that section very well.


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,458 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
On my own
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2495 guests, 106 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.