Ok, I've just got a new monitor (a 19" Eizo, calibrated with an Eye-One Display II), and I wanted to check how its gamut compares with sRGB.
I don't have any fancy profile analysis software, so this is what I did.
I created a document of six swatches of pure R,G,B,C,M & Y - 255-0-0, 255-255-0, etc, in Photoshop.
I assigned my monitor profile to the document, then converted it to sRGB (using Relative Colorimetric, BPC on), and checked the resulting values.
Red: 255,0,0
Green: 0,248,0
Blue: 0,71,255
Cyan: 0,255,255
Magenta: 255,68,255
Yellow: 255,247,0
From this, I deduce:
> My monitor's red and cyan are equal to or more saturated than sRGB red and cyan, and identical in hue (I hope my terminology is accurate enough for this unscientific experiment)
> Monitor green is almost as saturated as sRGB green, and identical in hue
> Monitor yellow is about as saturated as sRGB yellow, but just a teensy bit on the red side
Then I get a little bit uncertain, so this is more of a question than a deduction:
> Monitor blue is at least as saturated as sRGB blue, but much greener
And I've got no idea how to interpret the magenta. The red and blue components would indicate that monitor magenta is beyond sRGB magenta, yet the significant green component would appear to haul that back.
Would anyone care to discuss/contribute/poke fun?

I have no clue. How do the images look?


