Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 12 Jul 2008 (Saturday) 19:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Skyports or PW's

 
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Jul 23, 2008 20:12 |  #31

bieber wrote in post #5907775 (external link)
Yes, but it would still be a lot of unnecessary expense. Buying a couple AA's every couple months really isn't that big a problem...

If you buy good quality alkalines, it would only be two, maybe three purchases before you're even. Then you start saving, both your money and the environment. It was a pretty easy decision for me, once I saw how long the Eneloops and Imedions last on the shelf.


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
photojournalista
Senior Member
365 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 3
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 25, 2008 04:59 |  #32

tim wrote in post #5901483 (external link)
Give me a couple of days then PM me, i've used PWs a bit, and my skyports arrive in a day or two.

So, what's the verdict Tim?


photojournalista.blogs​pot.com (external link)
Nice painting, got photos?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
martinsmith
Senior Member
Avatar
680 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: S Glos, UK
     
Jul 25, 2008 07:41 |  #33

I use skyports. The only advantage I can see to buying PWs is if you want to trigger flashes in another solar system. If it's less than a few hundred feet, go with skyports.

Build quality is fine. And you get a padded case for them.


[SIZE=1]ms-imaging (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
splitslim
Member
Avatar
165 posts
Joined Aug 2006
     
Jul 25, 2008 07:43 |  #34

PW's all the way. I love mine!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 25, 2008 18:40 |  #35

photojournalista wrote in post #5981165 (external link)
So, what's the verdict Tim?

I've only used them a little around the house, they seem to work reliably up to about 90 meters. The ebay ones worked almost as reliably at home, they just misfired constantly at weddings, so we'll see in a month - it's winter so I don't have many weddings on. I might use them for some portraits in a couple of weeks too. Build quality is acceptable, not like PWs though, but way better than ebay ones.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
Jul 25, 2008 18:45 |  #36

Build quality seems fine to me but I know the antenna is aching to get snapped off.

I just bought two more skyport receivers. The first one worked good but I have 3 sunpak 383s I could use with them by setting each up separately around a room, and my last wedding experience made me think that getting extra receivers would be very useful.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jul 25, 2008 18:51 |  #37

tim wrote in post #5985108 (external link)
I've only used them a little around the house, they seem to work reliably up to about 90 meters. The ebay ones worked almost as reliably at home, they just misfired constantly at weddings, so we'll see in a month - it's winter so I don't have many weddings on. I might use them for some portraits in a couple of weeks too. Build quality is acceptable, not like PWs though, but way better than ebay ones.

I used mine at a long reception on the 19th. Zero misfires and the only issue was my lights (Vivitar 283s using just 4AAs) not recycling fast enough for my trigger-happiness. That of course has nothing to do with the Skyports.

If you don't mind the build (which I admit is rather chinsy), you should like them very much.

Having said that, I had to exchange the one set of transmitter & receiver because the transmitter started to lose contact both at the shoe and with the cord. They were starting to misfire at the end of a short wedding on the 12th. Since that was my first gig with them, I assumed it was user error until I got home to try and trouble-shoot. The test button worked great but the shoe and cord connections were duff.

The replacement set works fine though so I assume the other trigger problem was just a fluke. It also fits tighter in the shoe than the first one ever did. Heck even the case the replacements came in is better.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 25, 2008 19:08 |  #38

Hook up a fake battery and seal lead acid cells to the flashes cdi, they cut recharge time down by 2/3. My 383s dropped from 9s to 3s, maybe even less, under full charge. Costs very little too, I just have the SLAs in a small case I found at a local electronics store, sitting under the light stand. Fake batteries are way easier than how I did it, soldering directly onto the PCB. I can't use batteries in mine any more, doesn't matter as they were too slow anyway.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jul 25, 2008 19:10 |  #39

You mean like a Quantum type deal? I've been thinking about doing something along those lines. If I have outlets available though I can just use SB-4 AC Adapters. They're only 18 bucks each at B&H.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 25, 2008 22:00 |  #40

AC sounds like a pain in the butt, that's why I use SLA batteries. Those AC adaptors reduce the cycle time by half, which is pretty good, SLA bats I think are even better as you can draw a huge current from them, more than a little AC adaptor.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jul 25, 2008 22:02 |  #41

I'm wondering where I could get dummy batteries in a cluster though. I could tape them together I guess but then I'd have to wire them up as a cluster first. I'd rather get a cluster and run a wire from that, or even better have it pre-wired.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Jul 25, 2008 23:00 |  #42

tim wrote in post #5986144 (external link)
AC sounds like a pain in the butt, that's why I use SLA batteries. Those AC adaptors reduce the cycle time by half, which is pretty good, SLA bats I think are even better as you can draw a huge current from them, more than a little AC adaptor.

I'm with Tim on this one. If I'm gonna worry about AC power, I might as well bring my monoblocs!


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jul 25, 2008 23:09 |  #43

Rudi wrote in post #5986435 (external link)
I'm with Tim on this one. If I'm gonna worry about AC power, I might as well bring my monoblocs!

But they're heavier than a hot shoe flash and an AC plug.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Jul 25, 2008 23:28 |  #44

Not much... I travel with my D-Lites regularly, they pack into a bag as small as my hot shoe flashes and accessories! :) Plus, my recycle time goes down to just over a second, and I can do that all day without setting them on fire. :D


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jul 25, 2008 23:32 |  #45

There's no way a D-Lite is as small as a 283 and an AC plug. Sorry. Not possible.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,820 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
Skyports or PW's
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2747 guests, 145 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.